I would suggest the correct line should be
“While mass immigration continues, and remains one of the major concerns for a proportion of the electorate”
A significant proportion, but not the entire electorate.
As an elected politician who rarely attends the parliament he was elected to but undoubtedly still takes the money, he should not be listened to as a ‘voice’ of the people. As has been said above, it is now all about him.
In my opinion
No, he is still an irrelevance. May has quite cleverly managed to marginalise him, and UKIP, and that awful freeloading dinner he had last week with the Trump was a real embarrassment
As far as him commenting on Farage, I also note that Donald is delaying his state visit to the UK ‘to avoid embarrassment’ so it is most unlikely the Trump would wish to do any such thing.
In my opinion of course
One is reminded of the “sow the wind……”
If one spends time demonising people it sometimes may come back to bite one.
Re: #1083
But we haven’t yet left the EU, it could well be simply because the pound has dropped against all major currencies, so the “extra” £2bn is actually worth less than you think to the UK and has come whilst still having all of the benefits of being in the Trading block
It all depends on perspective.
I will wait to see what happens in five years time before crowing about brexit “success”
it is the provider more often referred to tacitly
This is the mindset I referred to. It Is in your mind that it it tacit, but not necessarily in that of others, nor of the writers of the sources you use. In the case of the Torygraph article you mentioned you may well be correct, but since the original source does not ake any reference either way it was innacurate to imply it was simply due to the public education system without further evidence.
On a personal level, I taught a number of privately educated students who had real difficulties with independent study and personal organisational skills because they had had all of their “prep” organised for them and when they were introduced to a system that required them to be disciplined found it very hard to cope. Anecdotally this is one problem that privately educated students encounter when leaving sixth form into university. This was true of both of my privately educated cousins for example.
It is not exclusive to one system or another, but the mantra private good/state bad is not bourne out by results. It is much more complex than that.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/universityeducation/11976195/State-school-pupils-likely-to-do-better-than-private-pupils-study-shows.html
https://www.dur.ac.uk/news/allnews/thoughtleadership/?itemno=25657
Actually John, the article does not mention either state or Private education, so I would guess it would apply to students from both types of institution.
Having read the survey that the Torygraph has taken very selected quotes from it is not as clear cut as the headline (a quote from a single academic in a “large modern university”) would suggest.
Almost half of academics (48 per cent) and nearly as many administrators and professional staff (43 per cent) do not think that students are well prepared for university study by their schooling, while just 28 per cent of academics and 38 per cent of administrators believe that students have a good grounding for higher study.
Opinion is, however, more split on whether this situation is worse than in previous years; 39 per cent of academics think that students are intellectually less able or less well prepared than previous generations, while 34 per cent disagree. The figures for administrators are 29 per cent and 42 per cent, respectively.
Having read the survey in its entirety, there is also no differentiation between students from private and state schools, indeed there is no mention of where the students referred to come from
https://www.timeshighereducation.com/features/the-teaching-survey-2017-results-and-analysis
But of course you would not acknowlege this as it doesn’t fit the mindset
Well John, as an avid Torygraph reader I am sure you had already seen it and not bothered to mention it. It cuts both ways.
Any attempt at spinning this to a positive for the occasionally corrupt Private education sector?
Before you explain to me that it is all in my mind, I have evidence, corroborated by the students themselves, that one of our local private schools has often had the A level and GCSE art coursework ‘presented’ by the art technicians for external assessment- for this read “finished off”.when A grade GCSE students from that school came to the college they could not as a general rule draw at all well. One even complained to me his teacher had altered his exam piece even after he had asked her not to.
Others have been censured for allowing unlimited time for completing controlled tests
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/2016/10/10/boarding-school-principal-gave-go-ahead-on-exam-cheating/
Interesting news regarding extra time given in exams,it appears that more than 20% of pupils at Private schools are allowed extra time, whilst the figure is 12%for the state sector. sounds a little odd to me. creative use of the applications to manipulate results?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/2017/02/10/independent-schools-giving-pupils-time-complete-exams-state/
So, whilst some of the more modern universities were definietly formed from Polys, in your book those that were new starts were also “Polys” even though they were not.
Hmmmm. Sounds a bit like an alternative fact to me. Or even a Daily Wail fact
Just out of interest, which University did you attend John? One of the newer ones?
I am afraid that that chip on your shoulder is slipping John.
The University of East Anglia was not and never has been a Polytechnic.
Unless you are suggesting that any university started from scratch since the 14th century was a polytechnic?
That is your problem John, you can’t or won’t recognise what is and isn’t an appropriate source for the topic in question. The article in the Independent is simply reporting a fact, that of Wikipedia making an editorial decision, whilst the Fail often just makes things up.the latest example is thier shameful manipulation of climate change data on a graph published in the paper version last week…. In an article about manipulation of data. You couldn’t make it up ( well actually they did)
I am not disagreeing with your point regarding wikipedia pages, indeed I would always tell my students who used them as a source to provide further corroboration as taking anything at face value is not always wise (Del. Tel?), and that’s why you should always check the sources out. Their point is that Dacre’s rag is consistently innacurate and so any attribution by them requires further checking as a matter of course.
It would appear that not everyone is sure of Paul Dacre’s reliability regarding news sources, particularly for the Online version
I hope she returns with clipped wings. She was the 1st & only clipped Spit I saw until Stephen Greys 9 arrived.
Looks like your wish has been granted
I think most of it ended up on his suit. He met a less than enthusiastic voter in Stoke
Well, it looks like he had a raw egg to fortify his extra curricular activities today