I can assure you Tony that at least one UK Citizen who lives abroad is VERY VERY unhappy about being used as a leverage point in this instance. Especially as she was denied the opportunity to vote on the referendum
To whit, my sister.
who would have guessed it? It appears that the right wing press isn’t willing to publish details of the car crash interview I mentioned yesterday with BoJo on R4
Those who perhaps missed the fun can hear some of it on the link from this web page. The whole thing is if anything worse than these snippets show.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boris-johnson-interview-audio-queens-speech-car-crash-unable-answer-questions-bbc-a7801936.html
Some further analysis here
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jun/22/boris-johnson-interview-disaster-diane-abbott
But in all serousness, it is at least as bad as anything Corbyn did during the election in terms of being unprepared before an interview it is approaching that of an Abbott and yet the difference is this buffoon is our foreign secretary with long term ambition to be PM
Thought so.
Oh well
I have never been to a workers convention. Would you recommend one?
Regarding the Queen’s Speech
Just listening to Boris being interviewed by Eddie Mair on R4
It is not going at all well for one of them.
And it isn’t EM
So tell all, John. Which university did you go to? This question has been asked a number of times, including by me, and I don’t recall that you ever replied. Which could imply that you went to the ‘university of life’ and therefore have no knowledge of what you always disparage. You are probably a few decades out of date in thinking on this, as well as many other things
Immigration at the root of all our problems again? What a surprise.
It’s the housing policy failures for the past 30 years that have cause the issues, that and the associated ideological mantras that went with them. And it has definitely got worse in the past seven years
So Switzerland is 50% less democratic than Romania?
you didn’t follow what I said. I did not say that home ownership is unhealthy, I said the obsession with home ownership as the only apparent route to individual prosperity is unhealthy. It is exclusive rather than inclusive. You defeat your own argument, by your suggestion we are considerably less democratic that we were 20 years ago.
If democracy was only provided by home ownership, you would be taking us back to the 18th century. What next, remove the right for women to own property when married?
Yet Ryan, it hasn’t happened. Even children of the middle classes are struggling to afford properties with their legacies.
Oh, and local authority social housing is not directly government owned. The obsession with home ownership is not healthy, and does not have any direct link with a country’s prosperity.
Switzerland has 44% home ownership, Germany just over 50%, Cuba has 90% and Romania 96%. Go figure
Re:#19
Not at any cost.
The old cliché about polishing a Turd comes to mind
I fully accept it will happen, but I’m yet to be convinced that it will be anything but to the long term detriment to the vast majority of the citizens of this country. I suggest you read or lsiten to Carney’s comments today.
Re:#17
Ryan, thanks for supporting my argument. I really appreciate it.
The short term gain for those who bought their house at a massive discount and then sold at a profit benefitted them without doubt, but at the expense of the next generation who could have benefitted from access to reasonably priced, good quality social housing. That is what I meant about the 80’s , it was a Me!Me!Me! culture that the tories supported with the stated intention of raising home ownership because they believed the recipients would vote tory. Gerrymandering at it’s worst. Shirley Porter was prosecuted for it
If they had allowed the local authorities to plough some of the sales proceeds into replacing the housing stock it wouldn’t have been so bad, but for ideological reasons they made sure that was not possible.
As far as home ownership is concerned, it is now at it’s lowest level for 30 years so the policy clearly failed in the long term, yet private renting, with all the lack of regulation and rise in poor quality,unsafe accommodation is at an all-time high. Again I ask, whom is benefitting from this?
I am also old enough to remember when the UK became a more socially unjust, self-centred and money grubbing society (although the leader of the government of the time said that there was no such thing as society). A great deal of society’s ills stem from that period in the early 80’s. The selling off of social housing for personal and political gain was a disaster that has increased the cost of housing benefit through the vast rise in private rented accomodation costs. Who benefits? Landlords.
We don’t all see the Thatcher years as the beacon of light many on here seem to.
And it seems that the Tories continue to see social housing as an anathema. There was an interesting interview with Nick Clegg where he stated that every time social housing came up when in coalition the response was “why would we want to encourage labour voters?”. Government Spending on new social housing has dropped by 97% since 2010.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/social-housing-government-funded-properties-rent-falls-97-per-cent-study-homes-communities-agency-a7799116.html
So far the score on the boards seems to be EU 1, UK 0 in terms of the negotiations. The UK Govt. have conceded on the timetable. Even the Tory graph concedes that the UK ‘caves in’
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/06/20/brexit-news-queens-speech-dup-live2/
And Boris got monstered by Carney at the mansionhouse
Don’t get me wrong,,I am as keen as anyone to ensure the UK gets a good outcome, it’s just that my concept of a good outcome is not leaving the Customs Union and having a substantial proportion of the benefits of the single market retained
Re#1167
The difference between us is that I don’t actually expect every single pound to get to the program it is aimed at. I am quite content that the vast majority does and the good that the programs our government support provides an enhanced reputation to the UK that is beyond anything dubious foreign policy decisions does. We punch well above our weight in this area, and that is to be applauded.
Certainly it is far better than the very dodgy foreign arms sales that this administration is pushing in an already volatile area of the world, no corruption there of course (not)
Good to see that some of the government ministers have their priorities focussed on promoting Britain’s standing in the world*
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jun/18/exclusive-priti-patel-insists-uks-aid-influence-is-massive
* and I don’t mean David Davies
ok, I’ll bite just to keep you happy, as I am sure that is what you intended.
Errr, just in case you have had a case of heatstroke John, I’m sure you would like me to point out a few factual errors in your post.
First, and perhaps most important, we have not yet left the EU and therefore to suggest it is independence day is not true, fake news, being economical with the actualite etc.
You might like to call it that, no one else I know does
Most momentous date? Lots of other would take precedent, for example 21st October 1805
The negotiations started today. Therefore you do not know, no one knows, whether we will ‘gain control of our border’ in the way you suggest. It may be that we end up with some elements of the customs union and free movement of people. It is a possibilty
My pride in britain reduced an notch on that day, and subsequent political events have not made me any prouder.
We’re a more insular, nastier and less tolerant nation on balance since that date. Nothing to be proud of there.
Actually I’ll take it a bit further, it is people of your sort who have made me take this view