In no particular order places I have visited and enjoyed apart from ones already mentioned.
Imperial War Museum, central London
RAF museum, Hendon (London suburbs)
RAF museum, Cosford, near Wolverhampton 140 miles from London by car
Shuttleworth Collection, Old Warden, Bedfordshire 50 miles from London by car
Solent Sky, Southampton, 85 miles from London by car
Lincolnshire Aviation Heritage Centre, East Kirkby, Lincolnshire, 130 miles from London by car
Fleet Air Arm museum, Yeovilton, Somerset 130 miles from London by car

The magazine which sponsors this forum has said that there was a “Vulcan effect”. Really, does anyone here actually read the thing?

No, I don’t actually. Gave up,years ago
And the point I was trying to make is that the organisers believed there was an effect but can we ever be sure?
I haven’t seen it fly, I was at a show it was booked to go to once but…..it didn’t arrive. I wasn’t there to see it so wasn’t bothered.

I am sure there was a Sandringham moored off Hythe in the mid/late 1980’s-I would hazard a guess at 1987 or 1988 purely because of when I bought the boat-as I sailed round it a couple of times in my Solo dinghy whilst I was a member of the Weston Sailing Club. Which would this one have been?

This is what my brother had to say about the BBC article:

“This is so depressingly poorly researched-Good in parts I think is generous”

Sums it up for me

Two aircrew survivors may be more accurate

I enjoyed the program, although some of the introduction was also poorly researched-probably by the same person as the written piece

I don’t have a business brain to explain the advantages of adjusting branding but in my opinion the change is successful, the old logo of the head on shot of the Triplane was too busy for easy reproduction, the typeface was hard to read. The new one has an Art Deco feel which is appropriate for a large percentage of the collection and is far easier to reproduce.
However, having made the decision to replace it, they really should go through the website and change all of the old versions, it looks poor in that respect at the moment.

I enjoyed it but may have preferred more about the skills involved in making the fuselage for example but I fully understand the restrictions as outlined above.
Guy Martin came across very well as did all involved TBH
A friend of mine just emailed me a question about the programme and it was clear he had watched almost all of it….
This is a guy who usually yawns within 2 secs of me mentioning anything aviation or engineering related and changes the subject immediately, so for it to engage him to that extent was a triumph for the programme makers.
Well done all involved

Edit:
The question related to how much of the plane that was recovered from the beach actually flew. He also expressed amazement about the cost of the airscrew-I couldn’t answer the first question beyond ‘not much’ and spent a few minutes talking about economies of scale in reproducing 75 year old technology for a very few items-in itself a minor miracle

Funny how lots of people look at the photos but very few take the time to comment…

Why should you expect me to comment?
The images are OK but…
Are you posting the images to help those less fortunate than yourself get some pleasure from the event?
Or expecting praise every time?
The former is commendable, the latter……
I personally don’t feel qualified to comment on the technical quality of images I look at. So I don’t

Possible engine issues?