dark light

trekbuster

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 1,180 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: General Discussion #231082
    trekbuster
    Participant

    meanwhile a white terrorist drives his van into innocent people in Finsbury Park and gets out and shouts “death to all muslims”

    Almost immediately there are some sections of the community taking about ‘metal health issues’ yet didn’t do the same when the nut jobs killed people in other parts of the city

    Double standards?

    in reply to: General Discussion #231250
    trekbuster
    Participant

    Yes, it was unfortunate that so many tory votes were north of the border, without those 12 seats who knows what might have happened.

    I notice that there hasn’t been any talk of Excluding Scottish MP’s voting on English only legislation recently……

    in reply to: General Discussion #231263
    trekbuster
    Participant

    oh, how droll.

    I think you are the only person denying any terrorist activity, it is just the wrong activity that you mentioned. Seeing youare so keen on the truth, I thought you would be very happy for me to point out your typo.

    So, the shorter your hair, the more suited you are for power? Perhaps Maybot should have a No.1 to get her credibility restored.

    And for the record, I am an own-up baldy so no neck shaving required

    in reply to: General Discussion #231375
    trekbuster
    Participant

    The reason that you didn’t see them after the Borough Market bombing was that there was no bombing at Borough Market.

    in reply to: General Discussion #231413
    trekbuster
    Participant

    why arson?. What inside information do you have to suspect that?

    in reply to: General Discussion #231414
    trekbuster
    Participant

    And your point is?

    Labour increased their share by 9.5%, UKIP lost 10.2%

    in reply to: General Discussion #231509
    trekbuster
    Participant

    Ryan, much as we disagree on things, I would hate for you to be sued for using words such as responsibility, culpable and culprits when the result of any enquiry is months or years away.

    in reply to: General Discussion #231907
    trekbuster
    Participant

    I saw the opposite to you, he was clearly distressed, and gave a deeply sympathetic response.
    It is your own prejudice that provided the political point.
    Uncalled for.

    Oh, and because I am sure you will try and make it personal, no, for the umpteenth time I am not a Corbyn supporter

    in reply to: General Discussion #231912
    trekbuster
    Participant

    If I thought he could actually do what he promised I might even vote for him, but every bone in my body along with every shred of data available says he can’t.

    I think we all understood your position about 125 posts and 75 graphs ago.

    in reply to: General Discussion #232006
    trekbuster
    Participant

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]254093[/ATTACH]
    What is slightly awkward for your line of reasoning regarding pensioners, it appears they were the only section of the population who voted in greater numbers for the Tories than Labour. in the ratio of approx 5/2

    Every other segment voted more for labour according to a new survey

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/labour-poll-tories-election-voters-support-breakdown-party-yougov-a7788696.html

    On another note, it is good to see the rats fighting

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/nick-timothy-theresa-may-chief-staff-lynton-crosby-tory-election-campaign-no-conservative-majority-a7789821.html
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]254094[/ATTACH]

    Facetious? Probably, but a gentle dig suggesting that putting the same data set in a slighly different graph up time after time rather lessens the impact

    in reply to: General Discussion #232232
    trekbuster
    Participant

    John, all you are doing is showing a boorish example of how little you know of the Sixth Form College pay structures at the time. A job had a going rate on a scale which rose on increment with experience to a threshold maximum. The scale I was on on was a few hundred pounds below the higher rate band at the time.

    if you look on this scale I would still be below the current threshold as a management band B3.

    https://www.teachers.org.uk/sites/default/files2014/appendix-2-old-pay-framework-jan-2017_0.pdf

    in reply to: General Discussion #232359
    trekbuster
    Participant

    My goodness Ryan, something we can agree on is buried in the last post (although are you sure you are feeling OK as there wasn’t a graph contained within it?)

    Equalised NI for the self-employed and employed.

    However, it got shouted down after the last budget. Dare they try it again?

    I only ever paid standard rate tax and NI through PAYE for the first 34 years of my working life, even as a senior teacher and Head of Department I never quite reached the Higher rate tax threshold. When I became self-employed I was surprised how much less NI I was expected to pay on an annual basis compared to my previous monthly payments

    in reply to: General Discussion #232476
    trekbuster
    Participant

    Another intersting perspective, courtesy of Lord Ashcroft*
    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/election-2017-labour-won-50-per-cent-vote-35-44-year-olds-conservative-poll-jeremy-corbyn-a7786056.html

    *although to be fair, his polling just before the election had shown a 56 seat tory majority. So perhaps not to be entirely relied apon

    in reply to: General Discussion #232481
    trekbuster
    Participant

    I think we have him rattled. Molars on the danglies?

    But never mind. He won’t change nor accept he could be wrong even when potential different opinions might be held from the same data set. That’s intellectual dishonesty

    On a more interesting topic more directly related to the election, I saw an amusing comment regarding the current tory predicament

    So if I’ve got this straight; she’s going to get them out of the mess she has just got them into, and take them back to the mess they were in before she got them to mess they are now in.
    Is that right?

    in reply to: General Discussion #232648
    trekbuster
    Participant

    I can’t speak for Beermat, however his rebuttal in #742 cuts it for me. You have a perspective, not a proven point.
    So tire away, you haven’t proven anything. The statistics might lead people to a similar conclusion, and you might be able to explain your point using those figures, but that in istelf is not an absolute proof

    Edit: a more accurate phrase for you to use would be:” i have shown you my data and they firmly support my view that….’

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 1,180 total)