747-400 Weights
Empty Weight: (P) 339,000-lbs
(C) 399,100-lbs
(R) 402,900-lbs
Maximum Takeoff Weight: (P) 800,000-lbs
(C) 850,00-lbs
(R) 870,000-lbs
Payload: 249,122-lbs of cargo
747-400 Performance
Cruising Speed: 583 mph
Initial Cruise Altitude: 32,900 feet at highest optional Takeoff weight
Range: (P) 8,245 miles
(C) 8,320 miles
(R) 8,170 miles
Assumes typical international rules, 420 three-class passengers, at highest optional takeoff weight.
747-400 Dimensions
Wingspan: 211 feet 5 inches
Length: 231 feet 10 inches
Height: 63 feet 8 inches
Wing Area: 5,825 square feet
747-400 Powerplants
No. Engines: Four
Engine Manufacturers: Pratt & Whitney (P)
General Electric (C)
Rolls-Royce (R)
Engine Designation: PW4056 turbofans (P)
CF6-80C2B1F turbofans (C)
RB211-524H turbofans (R)
Engine Power: (P) 57,900-lbs st each
(C) 58,000-lbs each
(R) 60,600-lbs st each
Airbus A380 Weights
A380-800 – Operating empty 275,000kg (606,000lb), max takeoff 548,000kg (1,208,000lb).
A380-800HGW – Max takeoff 560,000kg (1,235,000lb).
Airbus A380 Performance
A380-800 – Max cruising speed M 0.88. Long range cruising speed M 0.85. Range 15,100km (8,150nm). Service ceiling FL430.
A380-800HGW – same.
Airbus A380 Dimensions
A380-800 Wing span 79.8m (261ft 10in), length 73m (239ft 6in). Height 24,1 m (79ft 1in)
Airbus A380 Powerplants
A380-800 – Four 302kN (67,890lb) thrust class Rolls-Royce Trent 900 or Engine Alliance (General Electric-Pratt & Whitney) GP-7200 turbofans.
A380-800HGW – Four 311kN (69,915lb) Trent 900s or GP-7200s.
Airbus A380 Capacity (Accomodation)
A380-800 – Flightcrew of two. Standard seating for 555 passengers on two decks in a three class arrangement. Qantas plans to fit its aircraft with 523 seats (in three classes). A380 has 49% more floor area but only 35% more seats (in 555 seat configuration) than the 747-400, allowing room for passenger amenities such as bars, gymnasiums and duty free shops. Cargo capacity 38 LD3s or 13 pallets.
_________________________
hope i helped:)
********************** no **********************
taiwan will be a good option at least later on it can bargain too :diablo:
after reading all i got a bright buisness idea!
why not setup a biodiesel plant for exclusive import to PLAN for there future need for these conventional AC. oops ACs :D:D
what say guys which location will be suitable (real estate is lil cheap nowdays)
:diablo:
Unfortunately for America the reason everyone knows that saddam had WMD’s was because America supplied them. alot of things that shouldn’t have been done to get back at Iran! and if you believe an retired Iraqi general and the Australian SAS, they were transported in buses to syria.
Scooter, we will never be able to convince the pro chinese supporters-likely that they include members of the MSS, and to agree with us would be treason. probably printout our posts and show them around saying “look-the west hates us and will fund japanese and korean carriers-quick, build more”
fact is, no matter what you say china will not have 2 new carriers in 6 years. they are likely to be Varyag rip offs. they wont pose much of a threat.I’m sure the RAN couls spare a Collins class or two to deal with them.
they arenot that big a deal If china wnts to waste its money trying to compete with the US navy, let them- all the more sooner that the Taiwanese will be seen as the way and democracy will see the end of communism. just like russia
very true:)
1. Mistake GWB did was to attack Irak without finnish the job in Afganistan!
2. Mistake was the so called Pakistan allied, they are nothing but allied.
The goverment in Pakistan does not hold the peoples support in any way.3. Now US is so low om funding/moral/equipment caus of Irak war, they are forced to leave Iraq one way or another in near future to help matters in Afganistan. The worst asshole mistake in Irak was to desolve the Iraki army, just to built a new one 4-5 years later..
And by the way, where in Irak are all those WMD???
The Irak war should never happend in the first place..
well haavarla don’t u think govt of pakistan controls pak army:confused: if not may be opposite is true:confused:
1. Mistake GWB did was to attack Irak without finnish the job in Afganistan!
2. Mistake was the so called Pakistan allied, they are nothing but allied.
The goverment in Pakistan does not hold the peoples support in any way.3. Now US is so low om funding/moral/equipment caus of Irak war, they are forced to leave Iraq one way or another in near future to help matters in Afganistan. The worst asshole mistake in Irak was to desolve the Iraki army, just to built a new one 4-5 years later..
And by the way, where in Irak are all those WMD???
The Irak war should never happend in the first place..
well haavarla don’t u think govt of pakistan controls pak army:confused: if not may be opposite is true:confused:
Afghanistan has a traditional tribal culture with constantly changing alliances and allegiances. It is also a Muslim country. It is a country with terrain that facilitates indefinite resistance to a military opponent.
No foreign power is ever likely to “defeat” Afghan resistance. If it is defeatist to acknowledge that, the sensible guys are the defeatists.
well spitfire a good logic
but what if GB backs out and calls its troops back and US under obama doesn’t send its troops.
then what if GB & US both urge pak to send its troops to Afghanistan……
pak deploys its forces…….
but also asks china to help…..
china agrees….
sends its troops to Afghanistan………..
india attacks china……..
do u think india has a realistic chance of grabbing tibet…..or
losses kashmir………..
😀
then what will happen…….:eek:
Afghanistan has a traditional tribal culture with constantly changing alliances and allegiances. It is also a Muslim country. It is a country with terrain that facilitates indefinite resistance to a military opponent.
No foreign power is ever likely to “defeat” Afghan resistance. If it is defeatist to acknowledge that, the sensible guys are the defeatists.
well spitfire a good logic
but what if GB backs out and calls its troops back and US under obama doesn’t send its troops.
then what if GB & US both urge pak to send its troops to Afghanistan……
pak deploys its forces…….
but also asks china to help…..
china agrees….
sends its troops to Afghanistan………..
india attacks china……..
do u think india has a realistic chance of grabbing tibet…..or
losses kashmir………..
😀
then what will happen…….:eek:
thanx and if possible plz share photos of these two planes
thanx and if possible plz share photos of these two planes
thanx guys
which plane actually took over its place after its retirement?
annd plz check the specs i got r they consistent with u ? just i don’t wanna publish false specs here….
thanx guys
which plane actually took over its place after its retirement?
annd plz check the specs i got r they consistent with u ? just i don’t wanna publish false specs here….
is it tranche 2 ??
well congrats wan 🙂 hope he loves soccer and enjoy playing it
if u don’t mind i will become his first coach ………:dev2: later on ur fav will take over promise…….
well wishing him luck………
and u to have sound sleep……..when u get it:dev2::dev2::dev2::dev2: