All the high performance fleet defenders had some sort of high lift device. F-8 had adjustable wings, F-4 had boundary layer control, F-14 had swing wings. F-18 and F-35 have nothing and consequently their supersonic performance is poor. A fixed wing F-14 would have required some other high lift device, as the book says. Either that or give up on state of the art kinematics and go the F-18E/F route.
While I agree that ship-borne aircrafts generally feature some sort of high lift devices, not all of them carry the same level of weight/cost penalty as the swing wing. Look at Rafale-M, which almost exclusively relies on its low wing loading to achieve low speed performance.
Fresh MiG-31BSM.
That looks absolutely gorgeous. Can anyone advise me how far is the MiG-31BSM differ from the original MiG-31M (circa 1995ish)? Is there any plan for new built airframes apart from the upgrades? I haven’t been update with the mig front these days Sukhoi seems to be all the rage…
you aren’t seriously suggesting that the Knights ONLY do display formation!?
I think half of them are Instructors in VKS.
Couldn’t the same be said for other air forces? I mean all those hours spent on formation flying on the airframe do incur a hefty cost. That’s why the blues still flies A model hornets. Couldn’t the knights pick a more economical choice? Like the Yak-130?
Russian Knights got a Su-30SM!
Isn’t that a waste of resource to use a state of the art fighter for aerobatic display? It’s like the USAF using the F-22s for its Thunderbirds.
I’m sure this has been discussed before but does anyone know what’s in that stinger-tail? Anti-spin chute?
Great pic of T-50 by the way.
Thanks Deino.
I know it is comprehensively different (glass cockpit, composites, new engines… etc) but it really is amazing testimony to the soundness of Tupolevs basic design, which also first flew in the same month as the first B-52 prototype, all the way back in 1952.
This must be some type of record for a military aircraft, surely.
When you need a new bomber but you can’t (or don’t want to) design a new airframe for it, you’ll just have to make do I think. Nothing spectacular to speak of…
What is that?
Its not the recessed Phoenix launcher… what is it? I didn’t think F-14s got FAST packs…?
They where Phoenix launch rails that double as external fuel tanks. I don’t think they were every built though.
Am I heretic or just misimformed since I think I may have misunderstood a fighterpilot telling me an empty fueltank ( external ) can actually create some lift.
How about other ordnance. Does speed affect to it ? I mean missiles actually fly pretty long time by themselves ?
They do. The bigger the item the more lift it can potentially create. But then they also create (a lot of) drag, changes the static margin, affects the lifting capability of the airframe, creates vibration/flutter, etc etc. The net effective is most likely to going to be detrimental aerodynamically. That’s why everyone is crazy going for conformal fuel tanks and internal weapons bays these days.
My new acrylic painting. Exercise Red Flag, Alaska 2012. Best regards, Piotr Dubowik http://www.sztukaitechnika.pl/blog/60,red-flag-alaska.html
Impressive work! You’ve captured the menacing shape of the viper nicely. Interesting that the F-16 is on mil power while the F-22 in full afterburner, in a presumably a rolling scissors fight.
Hi All,
Blackbird :love-struck:Geoff.
WOW! Just wow! What an absolutely menacing look of fury. This thing looks ALIVE!
For those who can’t stop bitching about surface details, I present to you…
[ATTACH=CONFIG]233160[/ATTACH]
When an Aileron is designed to act has a flap as well, the terminology is to call it a “Flaperon“.
When the aileron act as an elevator surface as well such as on a Delta Wing design, the terminology is to call it an “Elevon“
Can we call it flalevon for TE control surfaces on X-32? You know, it’s a flap, an aileron, and an elevator all in one…
This is certainly not a good week for aviation. One fatality and one injury. R.I.P.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/10/31/us-space-crash-virgin-idUSKBN0IK24220141031
This is a really sad news. R.I.P. Michael Alsbury.
I hate that Su-34 light blue mix 🙁 .
If they had to get rid of the black Hellduck scheme, I would rather see the Su-35s original light grey/blue.
Meh, the black scheme looks too…aubergine. The cyan/aqua look is at least aesthetically pleasing…but to one his own I guess
This has been doing the rounds today:
http://m.huffpost.com/uk/entry/5286120/
Now clearly a drone, I was wondering is it actually an X47 in the hover? And what weaponry is being used? There’s light flashes and then the explosions.
The whole thing looks more like a test to me than an actual combat strike but I could be wrong.
Normally you would expect a delay for the sound after the visible explosion. I guess they also had advanced tech to make sound travel at the speed of light. :rolleyes:
I mean come on…(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELe52UcZJb4)