Wut..??
Where have I mentioned PakFa?
Alas, the side stepping danse continue..

You said the aircraft capabilities at the moment is only take off and landing, but that clearly not the case

The F-35B. And the term IOC really has no merrit.. What is its current capability? Take-off and landing?

Current capability? : take off, landing, crusing long distance, mid air refueling, reduced RCS airframe , detect, search, track targets using radar , IRST, RWR , drop bombs, launching missiles , firing gun, dogfight … etc

Ground based jammers outrange and outpower any aviation based jammers

Jamming effectiveness depending on signal to noise ratio so weaker jammer can be compensated by smaller radar cross section , iam quite certain that the radar mass of double digit SAM have very big RCS .

https://basicsaboutaerodynamicsandavionics.wordpress.com/2016/03/29/electronic-countermeasure-ecm/

GaN AESA & spanky new processing power all but nullify the moderate level of observable F-22 & 35 is built to,

GaN transmitter and better processing power will impove jamming capabilities too, and one of the main advantage of stealth platform is that they can reduce burn through range to extremely small value compared to non stealth platform so that would nullify the advance in radar technology

So what you are saying is that the F35 has no IR signature and is invisible. Link?

IR reduction measures don’t equate to IR stealth.
I have seen no information on the F35 regarding it’s IR signature in comarison to any other plane, so tough for me to make bold statements. While there is no doubt that manufacturers are considering IR reduction (where the exhaust is) you cannot do much about the fact that it’s a draggy plane moving through the air at a high speed which generates heat, it has a big engine etc.

Yes F-35 has IR signature just like any black body that has temperature higher than absolute zero , however if that aircraft body temperature is around the same as background temperature then it is extremely hard to detect it ( not even accounted for various factor such as weather, cloud ) , read the link GarryA posted , the bottom talk very detail about infrared reduction measuare (it not just the engine but various part on the F-35 too ) and how background temperature and speed affect IR detection range.
and an engine with higher thrust doesnot automatic mean they have higher IR signature

https://basicsaboutaerodynamicsandavionics.wordpress.com/2016/03/04/stealth-techniques-and-benefits/

And dont forget that IRST sensor can be jammed by LRF too
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=bBb2LpX5CnQC&pg=PA296&lpg=PA296&dq=DIRCM+laser+MJ&source=bl&ots=CDjaDoP-Rr&sig=Hgfm5Qm7D2uir1rA8FmNMucXH50&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjnob3kgd7JAhUGyRQKHWnECuQQ6AEILDAC#v=onepage&q&f=false

how do you know Brahmos-2 size. cruise missiles are far more compact, mobile than billistic missiles.

dont put your own theories. Brahmos is largest quantity high speed missile in continous production in tri service. tremendous confidence in its abilities. that is in country that can barely put a single test of Israeli joint project Barak airdefence missile after 10 years.

In every aspect. even the export of domestic version is more advanced than the export of customized version.

so basically you have nothing to support your opinion, Jesus, shouldn’t have wasted time arguing with you

I said that it is a possibility. If the jet is carrying IRIS-T then they have that option. It just not demonstrated in a war yet 🙂 Similarly the DIRCM on the F35 is also unproven.

both DIRCM and anti missiles missiles have been used for age :p , but honestly i dont think any pilot calm enough to shot down enemy missiles with his missiles

1 Not the current version of Meteor, there may be modified Meteor for the F35 but it’s not in the workings today.

but there is like 100 percent certain that it will be done :p , btw f-35 dont have problem carrying meteor at AG station , it only have problem carrying these missile at the AA station , so in theory , f-35 can carry 2 normal meteor and 2 clipped fin meteor , btw at the moment the f-35 not even done all testing yet

2 The acceleration “speed” is a limiting factor. In my old thread with PPI-films you can see the exhaust gases (the aircraft isnt necessarily visible but the tail of ionized gas is pretty easy to pick up from ground radars), the use of afterburner also makes it really hot, and the gases makes is a larger target to detect. So by accelerating (takes 68 seconds from mach 0,8-1,2) the F35 loses the advantage of stealth, at least momentarily.

to my understanding the high rcs exhaust gases only problem for the SR-71 as it have extremely long pume ,incredible high speed and due to it fuel as well no way you can compared that to f-35 or any other fighter which we both know travel at much slower speed

3 There are more than one sensor. IRST cant be jammed at the ranges discussed. With the IRST-systems fielded today a target like the F35 can be engaged at 50km by using IRST alone when flying at altitude.

Irst range is trade off by Fov , if you want short range , you can have great Fov ( 50-60 degree ) , you want long range => lens have to zoom , focus ..etc => the fov will be ****ty ( 1-2 degree ) the track speed of IRST also much slower than radar if i remember correctly , and no you willnot be able to engaged at 50 km by IRST alone , you need range for fire solution => laser finder range => 20 km ( OLS-35 ) , or 30km ( OFS )
and like i have mentioned before intercept using IRST will be much less effective compared to using radar caused you lack of information like speed , aspect angle

All modern jets can operate without AWACS if they want to thanks to modern data links. And once the target detects illumination and threat direction they can drop the EFTs and optimize the interception. Remember that the target always will detect the illuminator first if we assume a reasonably small technology gap between the sensors.

that depend , we are talking about AESA here , and even if the RWR can detect the emission , knowing only the general direction will not help much ( not sure if enemy is 50-200 or 400 km aways
http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=6yqfKaLp4noC&pg=PA133&lpg=PA133&dq=aesa+lpi&source=bl&ots=6mMRWVQoJf&sig=lk1KZT5xzjQQ5ebhoOQfpqtgj-8&hl=en&sa=X&ei=shOiUYTGDuek0AWGmoCgBA&ved=0CGEQ6AEwBw#v=onepage&q=aesa%20lpi&f=false

Of course, there are some targets that do not emit signals. “We prefer it that way, because he’s dumb,” remarked one Boeing engineer. In this case, the F-22 can use its LPI features to track the target — which is not a threat unless another radar is tracking the F-22 and datalinking information to the “quiet” aircraft — and can, if necessary, identify it.

http://www.f-16.net/f-16_forum_viewtopic-t-9268-start-0.html