@ff1987;
While I think a pilots comments of his own aircraft is valuable, I think it gets very idiotic when comparison with other aircraft begins. Same goes for x beat y incidents. For example, if we take pilot claims and incidents as fact:
a)
-Accoding to USAF pilots, F-16 is better dogfighter than F-18 and F-15.
-According to VVS pilots, Su-27 has better maneuverability than MiG-29.
-According to one USAF pilot MiG-29 cannot do most maneuvers F-18 does easily.
-Two Israeli F-15s downed equally numerous MiG-29s in close air combat.
Conclusion: Su-27>F-16>F-18>F-15>MiG-29

b)
-German MiG-29s consistently defeated F-16 and F-18.
-An USAF colonel claims F-15 and F-22 is better than Su-30MKI.
Conclusion: F-22>MiG-29>F-16>F-18>F-15>Su-27

c)
-Eurofighter pilot claims MKI had better maneuverability than they had but EF is sustains turns better than F-22.
-Ethiopian Su-27s consistently defeated Eritian MiG-29s without losses.
-Su-30MK pilots claim its better than F-15/16.
-Bulgarian MiG-29s defeated HMS equipped F-16 with R-60 missiles and without HMS.
Conclusion: Su-27>Eurofigher>F-22>MiG-29>F-16>F-15

If we try to merge these three, it will only conclude pilot’s comparisons are pretty much nonsense.

Also, same subjective plus/minus appear in different habits of the pilots with their respective airforces. For example, western pilots on Su-27 will hate its center stick, ergonomics and will find difficult to use. On the other hand russians tried side stick, no one liked it and they reverted back to center stick. And I havent seen a Russian pilot complaining about the difficulty of using his radar or anything.

In a sense, manufacturer of Eurofighter undisclosed some numeric performance data, which we can compare to other aircraft we know. Do you ask drivers opinion about cars’ acceleration if you knew both cars’ 0-100, 0-160, 0-200, 400m and 1000m times?

200kts to 680kts acceleration: Eurofighter = 30 seconds, F-16 blk50 = ~30 seconds, which looks equal to my eye.

TsAgi data says Su-27 can accelerate from 600 to 1100 km/h in 15 seconds.
If I interpolate F-16 flight manual data for same speeds, F-16 takes 15,74 seconds. By merging these two independent comparisons am I wrong to conclude in terms of acceleration Su-27 is better than Eurofighter?

dogfight also depend alot on pilot skill and tactic so quite hard to compared

This article is a load of rubbish not only is it comparing to the Mig 29A which is not fair but the Mig 29M SEVERELLY DOWNGRADED EXPORT VERSION OF Mig 29A the MONKEY EXPORT VERSION.
The export version of the Mig 29A has a completelly different severelly downgraded radar,fire control system,downgraded engines,downgraded ECM and IFF and navigation systems and the real Soviet VVS version especially the C is far superior.
The Soviet VVS started to use the Mig 29C in about 1987 which was vastly improved “The MiG-29S is similar in external appearance to older MiG-29B airframes, except for the dorsal hump behind the cockpit canopy. Differences start with the improvements in the flight control system. Four new computers provide better stability augmentation and controllability with an increase of 2° in angle of attack (AoA). Its improved mechanical-hydraulic flight control system allows for greater control surface deflections. The MiG-29S’s dorsal hump, earning it the nickname “Fatback” in service, was originally believed to be for additional fuel, but in fact, most of its volume is used for the new L-203BE Gardenyia-1 ECM system. The MiG-29S can carry 1,150 liter (304 US gallon, 2,000 lb) drop tanks under each wing and a centerline tank. Inboard underwing hardpoints are upgraded to allow for a tandem pylon arrangement for a larger payload of 4,000 kg (8,820 lb). Overall maximum gross weight has been raised to 20,000 kg (44,000 lb). The GSh-30-1 cannon had its expended round ejector port modified to allow for firing while the centerline tank is still attached. Improvements also allow for new longer-range air-to-air missiles like the R-27E (AA-10 “Alamo”) and R-77 (AA-12 “Adder”). Initially, the avionics of the MiG-29S only added a new IRST sighting system combined with a better imbedded training system that allowed for IR and radar target simulation. However, the final MiG-29S improvement kit also provides for the Phazotron N019M radar and more built-in test equipment (BITE) (especially for the radar) to reduce dependence on ground support equipment; MiG MAPO calls this model the MiG-29SD. Revised weapon system algorithms in the MiG-29S’s software, combined with an increase in processing capacity, allows for the tracking of up to 10 targets and the simultaneous engagement of two with the R-77 missile.”

newer mig-29 version mostly improve in electronic or RCS aspect and they become heavier as well so newer version not necessary more agile ( the same for F-16 , block 60 while have the best engine still not as agile as early version of F-16 like block 30) , i mostly talk about how agile these aircraft are