I wonder what plane that could be Acatomic? You have got me interested and excited. π
Itβs Okhotnik-B.
Iβm inclined to believe that the reason for Izd.30 long development lies in the high requirements made for Okhotnik-B.
π
[ATTACH=JSON]{“alt”:”Click image for larger version Name:t65178_110256797_y2mate.com – 100_5Lfv5D_0hBM_1080p[17-13-07].JPG Views:t0 Size:t85.8 KB ID:t3856126″,”data-align”:”none”,”data-attachmentid”:”3856126″,”data-size”:”medium”}[/ATTACH]
From http:// https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Lfv5D_0hBM Thanks to sasans23 for finding this.
Let me add something from that article (using GT):
“Compared with the fourth generation of engines in the fifth added the ability to cruise supersonic motion – for that engine must have a variable bypass ratio. This requirement added another parameter specific – specific fuel consumption at cruising supersonic speed. Also, the engine should be significantly less visible in the infrared and radio wave range. This is achieved by a special design of the nozzle and the inlet. A major aspect of the new engine is also a reduction in the cost of the machine life cycle – lower maintenance costs, longer TBO “, – said the new power plants Marchukov
Flat nozzle IS being developed but it’s not for Su-57 – it’s developed for another airplane π
@paralay
I asked because of this article:
And yet, says deputy head of the research department of the Air Force Research Institute Alexander Nemov, being developed unmanned long-range complex which is capable of performing automatic low-altitude flight at supersonic speeds and hit both stationary and mobile targets in-depth strategy. Such machines are not yet in any army in the world.
Published on 25.02.2018 -> https://m.tvzvezda.ru/news/opk/content/201802250940-tffd.htm
I assumed they were talking about Okhotnik-B, but I guess there is some other unmanned strike project in the works. I didn’t take that article seriously (hypersonic weapon, laser) but that changed on March 1 π
Oh, and what does abbreviation NIR in that picture mean?
The maximum take-off weight is 20 tons, the engine is probably from the Su-35S without the afterburner. Weapons ~5000 kg
Thanks paralay.
There are several reports of a supersonic UAV being developed and I wonder are they talking about Okhotnik-B or some other UAV?
Would the aerodynamic layout and engine power even allow for supersonic speed of Okhotnik-B?
[ATTACH=CONFIG]260666[/ATTACH]
@paralay or anybody for that matter.
Do you have any reliable information about Okhotnik-B?
Thanks!
We already know in part how it will look, posted in this very thread. That is not complete phase 2 however, it seems. (as apparently sidebays will change too)
By how much?
From Paralay. Have not seen the smaller installation before…
Front edge of side weapons bays?
P stands for “pusk”?
A small correction:1500+km
My understanding of that “+” is that 1500km distance is at max. speed and that it can increase if you fly at slower supersonic speed (of course at optimal altitude).
Bla bla bla, yawn. π
Here is a new video about T-50 with footage from Akhtubinsk (!!!);
http://tvzvezda.ru/schedule/programs/content/201412231323-1cpc.htm/201504051146-l5ck.htm
My understanding of Russian is poor but @10:10 did he say that Su-35S can take off from 100m of runway?
Roadmap under AFRL’s INVENT program –
What if they redirected “waste heat” into the engines? A very similar thing was done with experimental nuclear powerd bombers.
It is extremely likely that test stand was there even before T-50-1 flew for first time. Secondly, from outside it is just a mock up. Considering the real windshield looks more refined and the probable age of this test stand; imho the cad one is an earlier version. And it resembles the early “leaked” versions:
I agree with you. I just put it as a interesting tidbit.
On a similar note, at Aero India 2015, there was a PMF model (Indian Pak-Fa) with a slightly redesigned OLS housing:
[ATTACH=CONFIG]235688[/ATTACH]
Some stuff from Korotchenko:
UAC @ Aero-India:
Again it might mean something or it might mean nothing π
Yes, now that i compared to pics of real thing you are both correct. I immediately disagreeded without comparing due to “single piece canopy” comment. π Windshield is also definitely different in several outlines, best seen when compared to T-50-0. If i were to *guess*, the CAD is showing an earlier version.
Hate to bring this up again but it looks like the test mockup is the same as the CAD image:
[ATTACH=CONFIG]235483[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]235484[/ATTACH]
@ Berkut
I don’t know, if you look at CAD there’s a bend in the lower part of the frame of the canopy. Since this is CAD image it could just be a initial version of the canopy which later got discarded.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]234840[/ATTACH]
Also, is there anything else in that link that didn’t get mentioned?
A list of all the new details shown:
– as mentioned before, weaponbay with a spoiler
– redesigned canopy and windshield, possibly a single piece canopy?
– a novel method of active cooling of nozzles
– “rugby ball” shaped radar antenna
Feel free to add to list or correct me if there is anything wrong.
Thanks nice find.
x2 :applause:
I giggled at the S-37 and S-duct mention.
Aerosol system to lower IR emmision? Do you think that might actually find service?
Maybe they use fuel as a aerosol? It would be great if that’s the case, because they could use the system as retrofit on “older” airplanes like Su-35S and Mig-35.