dark light

Acatomic

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 116 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Su-57 News and Discussion -version_we_lost_count!- #2104334
    Acatomic
    Participant

    I wonder what plane that could be Acatomic? You have got me interested and excited. 😎

    It’s Okhotnik-B.

    I’m inclined to believe that the reason for Izd.30 long development lies in the high requirements made for Okhotnik-B.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2109138
    Acatomic
    Participant

    πŸ™‚

    [ATTACH=JSON]{“alt”:”Click image for larger version Name:t65178_110256797_y2mate.com – 100_5Lfv5D_0hBM_1080p[17-13-07].JPG Views:t0 Size:t85.8 KB ID:t3856126″,”data-align”:”none”,”data-attachmentid”:”3856126″,”data-size”:”medium”}[/ATTACH]

    From http:// https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Lfv5D_0hBM Thanks to sasans23 for finding this.

    in reply to: Su-57 News and Discussion -version_we_lost_count!- #2110263
    Acatomic
    Participant

    Let me add something from that article (using GT):

    “Compared with the fourth generation of engines in the fifth added the ability to cruise supersonic motion – for that engine must have a variable bypass ratio. This requirement added another parameter specific – specific fuel consumption at cruising supersonic speed. Also, the engine should be significantly less visible in the infrared and radio wave range. This is achieved by a special design of the nozzle and the inlet. A major aspect of the new engine is also a reduction in the cost of the machine life cycle – lower maintenance costs, longer TBO “, – said the new power plants Marchukov

    Flat nozzle IS being developed but it’s not for Su-57 – it’s developed for another airplane πŸ˜‰

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2143235
    Acatomic
    Participant

    @paralay

    I asked because of this article:

    And yet, says deputy head of the research department of the Air Force Research Institute Alexander Nemov, being developed unmanned long-range complex which is capable of performing automatic low-altitude flight at supersonic speeds and hit both stationary and mobile targets in-depth strategy. Such machines are not yet in any army in the world.

    Published on 25.02.2018 -> https://m.tvzvezda.ru/news/opk/content/201802250940-tffd.htm

    I assumed they were talking about Okhotnik-B, but I guess there is some other unmanned strike project in the works. I didn’t take that article seriously (hypersonic weapon, laser) but that changed on March 1 πŸ˜‰

    Oh, and what does abbreviation NIR in that picture mean?

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2143275
    Acatomic
    Participant

    The maximum take-off weight is 20 tons, the engine is probably from the Su-35S without the afterburner. Weapons ~5000 kg

    Thanks paralay.

    There are several reports of a supersonic UAV being developed and I wonder are they talking about Okhotnik-B or some other UAV?

    Would the aerodynamic layout and engine power even allow for supersonic speed of Okhotnik-B?

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]260666[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2143770
    Acatomic
    Participant

    @paralay or anybody for that matter.

    Do you have any reliable information about Okhotnik-B?

    Thanks!

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXV #2179946
    Acatomic
    Participant

    We already know in part how it will look, posted in this very thread. That is not complete phase 2 however, it seems. (as apparently sidebays will change too)

    By how much?

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXV #2186909
    Acatomic
    Participant

    https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/Uqg_1_rX9eePRxL7-M5GpMtZT8ePByKkbpyCueImrGLS=w1396-h1047-no

    From Paralay. Have not seen the smaller installation before…

    Front edge of side weapons bays?

    P stands for “pusk”?

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2210851
    Acatomic
    Participant

    A small correction:1500+km

    My understanding of that “+” is that 1500km distance is at max. speed and that it can increase if you fly at slower supersonic speed (of course at optimal altitude).

    Bla bla bla, yawn. πŸ™‚

    Here is a new video about T-50 with footage from Akhtubinsk (!!!);

    http://tvzvezda.ru/schedule/programs/content/201412231323-1cpc.htm/201504051146-l5ck.htm

    My understanding of Russian is poor but @10:10 did he say that Su-35S can take off from 100m of runway?

    in reply to: Rise of the 6th Generation Fighter … #2217311
    Acatomic
    Participant

    Roadmap under AFRL’s INVENT program –

    http://s13.postimg.org/izvzngkbb/AFRL_IT.png

    What if they redirected “waste heat” into the engines? A very similar thing was done with experimental nuclear powerd bombers.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2217350
    Acatomic
    Participant

    It is extremely likely that test stand was there even before T-50-1 flew for first time. Secondly, from outside it is just a mock up. Considering the real windshield looks more refined and the probable age of this test stand; imho the cad one is an earlier version. And it resembles the early “leaked” versions:

    http://www.paralay.com/pakfa/t50%20%2893%29.jpg

    http://www.paralay.com/pakfa/t50%20%2879%29.jpg

    I agree with you. I just put it as a interesting tidbit.

    On a similar note, at Aero India 2015, there was a PMF model (Indian Pak-Fa) with a slightly redesigned OLS housing:

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]235688[/ATTACH]

    Some stuff from Korotchenko:

    UAC @ Aero-India:

    http://i-korotchenko.livejournal.com/988072.html

    Again it might mean something or it might mean nothing πŸ™‚

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2220076
    Acatomic
    Participant

    Yes, now that i compared to pics of real thing you are both correct. I immediately disagreeded without comparing due to “single piece canopy” comment. πŸ˜› Windshield is also definitely different in several outlines, best seen when compared to T-50-0. If i were to *guess*, the CAD is showing an earlier version.

    Hate to bring this up again but it looks like the test mockup is the same as the CAD image:

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]235483[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]235484[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2229985
    Acatomic
    Participant

    @ Berkut

    I don’t know, if you look at CAD there’s a bend in the lower part of the frame of the canopy. Since this is CAD image it could just be a initial version of the canopy which later got discarded.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]234840[/ATTACH]

    Also, is there anything else in that link that didn’t get mentioned?

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2230024
    Acatomic
    Participant

    A list of all the new details shown:

    – as mentioned before, weaponbay with a spoiler

    – redesigned canopy and windshield, possibly a single piece canopy?

    – a novel method of active cooling of nozzles

    – “rugby ball” shaped radar antenna

    Feel free to add to list or correct me if there is anything wrong.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2230306
    Acatomic
    Participant

    Thanks nice find.

    x2 :applause:

    I giggled at the S-37 and S-duct mention.

    Aerosol system to lower IR emmision? Do you think that might actually find service?

    Maybe they use fuel as a aerosol? It would be great if that’s the case, because they could use the system as retrofit on “older” airplanes like Su-35S and Mig-35.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 116 total)