In what thread on mycity-military that picture has been posted Acatomic ? Thanks.

Here: http://www.mycity-military.com/Opste-vojne-teme/Privredno-kretanje-namenske-industrije-Srbije_44.html#1316186

According to the link:
Analizirali smo i četiri motora svetskih marki: „snecma“, „rolce-royce“, GD,„pratt & whitny“

He is talking about NA not NA-LIFT, it is not known what engine the LIFT version will use.

I also checked the article that GrM sourced from and it is actually Croatian, speculative and questioning how Serbia could do such a thing.

Check again 😉 http://www.politika.rs/rubrike/tema-dana/Srbija-na-krilima-supersonika.sr.html

Ground clutter isn’t an issue for modern missile guidance, and only comes into play if the target is flying so low that terrain prematurely activates the missile’s proximity fuze. This would require the target to be flying 3-4 meters above terrain.

The memory within digital guidance computers allows the latest ECCM techniques to be uploaded as the missile is removed from the shipping container and fins are bolted in place. With 2-way data links and off-board data processing, missiles will become increasingly difficult to soft kill.

What about modern SAM-s (big ones)?

Video of test http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-BukbpkOd8

I think you are confused about what role the Pak-Fa is meant for..

The Pak-Fa do not need such A2G sensor package as you try to smear all over it.

Take a look at what other assets VVS has for A2G role, long range stand-off and all the way to CAS role.

If you think the Pak-Fa will carry a big A2G targeting/sensor Pod, so be it.. i cant help you..

F-35 EOTS can be (and will be) used for A2A 😉 http://www.lockheedmartin.com/content/dam/lockheed/data/mfc/pc/f-35-lightning-ii-electro-optical-targeting-system-etos/mfc-f-35-eots-pc.pdf

And Pak-Fa’ pod (101-KS-N) can be used for “aerial targets tracking” (second picture) http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?149828-Sukhoi-T-50-PAK-FA&p=6051446&viewfull=1#post6051446

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_TFGf6x6rA4

Is that a tablet computer on his leg?

😎

I have a engineering question.

Based on information that there’ll be 4 missiles/bombs i MWB, would it make sense to put a wall in the middle of WB, to make the whole thing more rigid?

Like this:

@ flateric

Nice

I wonder if they could use a adaptor (something like APU-60-2) to squeeze in more missiles?

Seems a bit um… dangerous allowing buses to drive under it, all you need is for someone to clip the wing and photo oppourtunity presents itself! lol

Bus(es) are part of the escort. You can see it in this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lS9GSVGO7yo