dark light

Treadstone

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 19 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Spitfire exhaust stubs #1247686
    Treadstone
    Participant

    Thanks…

    I also wonder why the Spit MK IX had four blade props and the late LF V’s had three? They had approximately same amount of power.

    in reply to: Nicest handling Spitfire? #1263451
    Treadstone
    Participant

    Thanks for all the information!!

    But who is fastest of the ground: Merlin Spits or heavier and more powerful Griffon Spits?

    in reply to: Nicest handling Spitfire? #1264216
    Treadstone
    Participant

    Why did they replace the early rudder type with the broad chord rudder type?

    It looks to give more drag and problably weight as well?

    in reply to: Nicest handling Spitfire? #1264933
    Treadstone
    Participant

    Griffon tail?

    Perhaps the later interchangeable pointed ‘Broad chord rudder’?

    Mark

    Exactly.

    in reply to: Nicest handling Spitfire? #1264953
    Treadstone
    Participant

    Is there a difference in handling between a Spit IX with a Merlin tail and a Spit IX with Griffon tail?

    in reply to: Nicest handling Spitfire? #1265841
    Treadstone
    Participant

    A particular favourite of Jeffrey Quill was the prototype DP845, basically a MK V fitted with the short single stage Griffon engine.

    The most grunt in the lightest airframe under 10,000′ – the Mk XII.

    Mark

    Hmm… I thougt later LF V where better at low altitude
    Spit V with M50m or M55m had the same amount of power as an IX and alot lighter.

    in reply to: Nicest handling Spitfire? #1266523
    Treadstone
    Participant

    Depends what you’re doing with it, doesn’t it?

    Aerobatics?

    Dogfighting?

    Steve Hinton sings the praises of the Spitfire V and IX most highly for aerobatics.

    Aerobatics.

    V and IX: thats what i thought. any particular ones?

    I heard somewhere that BBMF XIX PM631 was quite good?

    in reply to: AB910 New painting #1265107
    Treadstone
    Participant

    Yes she still has the four bladed prop and the six exhaust cans each side, although I believe that she will be fitted with three cans each side in the near future.:)

    IMO she is more beautiful with six exhaust cans each side than three, but for historical reasons it might be better with three.

    A Spit mark V with four bladed prop and twelve exhaust cans. Nothing more beautiful than that:) IMHO

    in reply to: AB910 New painting #1265220
    Treadstone
    Participant

    Does AB910 still have a four blade prop and six exhaust stacks each side?

    in reply to: New engine for MH434? #1279802
    Treadstone
    Participant

    Any Engine news?

    in reply to: Spitfire AB910 #1303080
    Treadstone
    Participant

    Does the 4 blade give more performance at high altitudes and 3 blade better down low?

    And is AB910 a stock aircraft like MH434 or is it a ripped version that weights 1000 pounds less than a original one?

    in reply to: Spitfire AB910 #1303729
    Treadstone
    Participant

    Is AB910 a stock aircraft?
    But why does IX uses four blade while mark V and LF V uses three blade prop?

    The LF V have the same amount of power at low altitude as the IX.

    in reply to: Spitfire vs Me109. Sustained Turn #1321315
    Treadstone
    Participant

    Thanks for some good information! Galdri

    in reply to: Spitfire vs Me109. Sustained Turn #1322634
    Treadstone
    Participant

    For the pilot answer, there is one who frequents this forum who has flown many Spitfires and a real 109…so over to him!!

    And who will that be?

    Thanks for answering my post.

    in reply to: Spitfire vs Me109. Sustained Turn #1323288
    Treadstone
    Participant

    I know the pilot is a deciding factor , but generally i belive one aircraft is superior.

    Spitfire have lower wingloading, but have less power to weight ratio and are more draggier.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 19 total)