Warning! Beautiful legs can cause Havoc…..mmmmmmmmmmm……..
And the presence, right here, of this big horizontal gun with two… “things” on the sides, is, well… well… err….
…
…odd ? 😀
________
NEVADA MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARY
Speaking of the mistral: the building of the third ship of the class, the Dixmude, begins today! 🙂
________
Honda S800 specifications
That’s it ..Rafale has lost in Brazil.. I couldn’t believe my eyes when I read the news..
Where the heck have you read that ??? 😮
Well, the idea of an airdraft combining a turboprop with a jet engine, proved a not-so-good idea, but the Vulture remains a most beautiful looking aircraft, thank for posting about it, H_K… 🙂
________
Alaska Dispensaries
Cool — a MiG-28!! 😉
That’s EXACTLY what I though when I saw the movie… 😀
________
Eucd platform
Many thanks, Kopyo-21. 😉
________
Ipad Guides
Airbus proposed the A340 as a cruise missile carrier some years ago.
I know. That plus the April’s fool joke of an A-380 cruise missile carrier in 2005.
BTW: if someone can find us some pictures of both projects, I’d thank him very much…
Many thanks, Sens, for this very comprehensive and informative answer… 🙂
Another thing: I heard that the Fulcrum A has a range as the crow flies of 1500 km on internal fuel only. Can someone confirm, please ?
________
Qr50
The logic step would be to develop a platform with better availability , readiness, range, performance than the B52s…at the end that’s the real deal, no pre-emtive stealth strike garbage, no risky low penetration, but just a platform with enough endurance for patroling, flying with enough cruiser missiles, and the 52 is still the king, because of that.

He! He! He! 😀
Hello!
Since we have this thread about MiG-29 gun fuel tank questions, can someone give me the various internal fuel tank capacities of the various Fulvrum versions and the various kind of drop tanks it can carry, please ? 🙂
________
Weed
Thank you TMor.
And you believe that just the Rafale ever lost out on political grounds and bad marketing? Quite naive.
And why not ? Selling/Buying combat aircrafts is first and foremost a political decision. Then come the budget and technical considerations…
________
Vaaapp
As a complement, according to Jean-Dominique Merchet, The Rafales and F-22 engaged in combat six time, the Rafale losing only once. No informations about the actual kill ratio, though…
http://secretdefense.blogs.liberation.fr/defense/2009/12/carton-plein-pour-le-rafale-lors-dexercices-aux-emirats.html
________
Arizona medical marijuana dispensaries
30 km = 10.000 feet ?
According to my own calculatuion: No.
As far as I know, 30 km = 100.000 feet.
But, you know, “0” doesn’t make a big difference, or does it ? 😀
F22 inferiority complex? Merlok?
Huh ? Sorry I don’t see you point, here… Do you mean I got an inferiority complex ? Genuine question… :confused:
I read it as an insulting statement..”from several encounters, the rafale went only once in the 22’s crosshair”.
I simply read, that (in French):
Il [Rafale]n’aurait ?t? dans le collimateur du chasseur am?ricain qu’en une seule occasion, explique t-on aussi.
Translates has: “he (Rafale) would have been in the american fighter’s sight only once”
I see that:
1-The rafale had been shot once.
2-No report of F-22 shot by Rafale.
3-I assume that, if so, the French would have been more than glad to tell they shot a F-22, don’t you think ?
So my bet: Rafale:0/F-22:1
________
Wholesale Vaporizer