Astute doesn’t carry nuclear weapons.
Could this perhaps be in addition to the 4 additional Tornadoes that was recently announced?
Bingo:
My informations say 4 more tornado on italia, not 4 typhoon.
That would make sense.
This article implies that RAF Typhoons are being deployed to perform an a2g role, has anybody seen anything from another source confirming this? The MoD site doesn’t say anything at present.
I think it’s typically rubbish BBC reporting on defence matters, I think the only thing significant is that 4 more RAF aircraft are going to be operating out of Italian airbases.
Hopefully Australia gives it a good home, it still makes me mad that we’re flogging off on the cheap such a useful ship though.
Excellent news, potential for exports is very nice as well.
Mistral good looking – goes to show it takes all sorts i personally think the French should be thanked for building the mistral as it stops the Daring being the ugliest thing afloat.
If you’re saying that about the T45 then your statement is proof positive that “it takes all sorts”.
How would the final price of this ship compare with another 45,000 ton aircraft carrier? Say…..Charles de Gaul?
That would be a rather poor comparison to make since CdG was new and nuclear powered.
The Americans are using Marine Harriers flying off the Kearsage. Could GR9s not do the same job?
They could if we had any in service but we don’t.
Well they have been proved wrong within six months. If this situation had occurred six months later we would not have enough GR4 squadrons to commit as well as providing cover in Afganistan. On top of this our Nimrod R1’s would have gone. The Sentinel, which is going as soon we pull out of Afganistan, is ideal for policing troop movements in Libya, but was not seen as worth keeping. Regeneration of lost air and sea capacity takes decades whilst land force capacity can be regenerated far quicker yet we are going to be left with a disproportionately large army which we will not be able to fully exploit due to lack of supporting air and sea forces.
I never said I agreed with them, you’re preaching to the choir.
BBC are reporting that the Tonka missions flown from Marham are the longest distance ones since the Falklands.
Not sure how they are coming up with that as I thought the distance of missions flown then were 8,000 miles, and since that B-52s were flown directly from US and UK for their Iraq missions?
Longest RAF missions since Black Buck, it’s just the BBC being crap at Defence reporting again.
Dennant has already been on sky news, defending the focus of the defence cuts and minimising the UK’s contribution to policing the no fly zone. He said we should continue to focus on Afgan!! But then again he would say so as it was the generals who told Cameron that any future conflict would involve us sending the army and that we didn’t need any fast jets anymore!
Actually what they said was more along the lines of needing less fast jets and ships.
when was the last time offensive operational combat air missions were launched from UK soil?
I believe B52s were launched from UK soil in both Gulf Wars.
just a thought, but i wonder if the RAF was keen to run the initial Stormshadow raids from Marham to show it still has a long range strike capability (and that the world doesn’t revolve around carrier strike).
I’m not trying to be mischievous, it just rings a bell from what i have read of Operation Black Buck during the Falkland War.
The involvement of 4 GR4s did sound a little ‘me too’ especially when you consider the US Navy and a RN Trafalgar class launched over a hundred Tomahawks.
Lewis page is and idiot, there’s so many holes in his cheap and cheerful merchantman hull stuffed with expensive stuff idea it’s hilarious.
Using RFA’s with big hangers is fine for disaster relief and even hunting pirates, they wouldn’t be much use in any sort of serious conflict against an opposing navy though.