dark light

kev 99

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 931 through 945 (of 1,460 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Germany To Cut Eurofighter Order, Seek Exports #2435760
    kev 99
    Participant

    Ok, as this topic is misunderstood I had a look at what really was decided. The coalition treaty says “Bei dem zu beschaffenden Eurofighter haben sich die Koalitionsparteien darauf geeinigt, zukünftige Exporte auf die noch in der Tranche 3b zu beauftragenden Stückzahl anrechnen zu lassen.”

    In English this means, that any future export would be made from T3B. So effectively, if we found a buyer we would sell him T3B tiffies. And if we don’t we’ll just decide in 2012 what we do as we planned to all the way.

    Sounds suspiciously like nothing, or at least little has really changed and this report is just a load of hot air.

    in reply to: Nuclear Propulsion in Large Carriers? #2015388
    kev 99
    Participant

    I think its actually as simple as that the UK does not have a Nuclear Certified ship breaking yard.

    I think its more simple than that, the current Government can’t see beyond the higher capital costs, Gordon Brown is obsessed with PFI for much the same reason.

    in reply to: Does Russia want to keep the ex-Gorshkov??? #2015631
    kev 99
    Participant

    Sorry, Russia’s Carrier Program has been put off.:( See the possible interest in the ex-Gorshkov!

    That may well be the case, they seem hell bent on rebuilding a shadow of the Soviet Navy using the same ships (modernised Kirovs, Slavas, etc), but that doesn’t mean they still don’t intend to build their own carriers.

    in reply to: Does Russia want to keep the ex-Gorshkov??? #2015642
    kev 99
    Participant

    Russia has had plenty of time to get the Goshkov back into service if they wanted it, the Gorshkov rebuilding was just work experience gone bad for the Russian shipyard Sevmash, although I’m pretty sure that useful lessions will of been learned for the Russians own carrier programme, when it gets off the ground.

    in reply to: Navy surrenders one new aircraft carrier in budget battle #2015798
    kev 99
    Participant

    The number 75 used as an airgroup for CVF probably comes from the original intention to buy 150 JSF for the two carriers, 150 divided by 2 is 75 after all and yes, I really do think that journalists are that lazy/ignorant.

    in reply to: Navy surrenders one new aircraft carrier in budget battle #2016503
    kev 99
    Participant

    Which reminds me, WIHIH to that first flight? They’ve been fiddling around at Woomera for months, & it’s all gone very quiet.

    http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showpost.php?p=1487082&postcount=534😉

    in reply to: Military Aviation News from around the world – III #2439526
    kev 99
    Participant

    PICTURE: UK’s Mantis UAV demonstrator makes first flights
    By Craig Hoyle

    BAE Systems has conducted the first few flights of its Mantis unmanned air vehicle under a technology demonstration effort jointly funded by the UK Ministry of Defence.

    Performed at the Woomera test range in South Australia, the flights have seen the fully autonomous design “successfully complete a series of trials demonstrating the capability of the system and the potential of large unmanned systems to support future UK operational needs”, says BAE.

    The work has also “helped build confidence in the feasibility of a UK-derived medium-altitude, long-endurance unmanned aerial system,” says Air Vice Marshal Simon Bollom, director combat air for the MoD’s Defence Equipment & Support organisation.

    http://www.flightglobal.com/assets/getAsset.aspx?ItemID=31624

    Mantis had originally been expected to fly early this year, but BAE says the milestone still took place within 19 months of concept work. “This achievement is testament to the can-do approach of the whole team working on this programme,” says Chris Allam, managing director of the company’s autonomous systems and future capability business.

    The Mantis programme also involves companies including GE Aviation, Meggitt, QinetiQ, Rolls-Royce and Selex Galileo.

    Powered by two turboprop engines, the all-electric Mantis air vehicle has a 20m (65ft) wingspan. The current “Spiral 1” design was unveiled at the 2008 Farnborough air show as a UK alternative to designs such as the US General Atomics MQ-9 Predator B/Reaper. The domestic system is intended to carry a variety of advanced sensors and precision-guided air-to-surface weapons.

    BAE says a production version of Mantis would have a maximum take-off weight of about 9t, operate at altitudes up to 55,000ft and perform missions including intelligence, surveillance, target acquisition and reconnaissance, plus close air support for ground forces.

    News at last

    in reply to: More Chinooks for the RAF #2440003
    kev 99
    Participant

    I’m favour of this, I just hope that the Chinook order isn’t seen as the universal panacea to the helicopter problem,.

    in reply to: Time again #2016658
    kev 99
    Participant

    Well same price for equivalent stuff of course. France would pay the cost of fitting the nuclear powerplant. Besides the UK might as well get nuclear ones since we’re revisiting history.

    Nic

    Since we’re revisiting history and building twice as many economies of scale would make UK going nuclear a great deal more sensible as well.

    in reply to: Time again #2016663
    kev 99
    Participant

    IMO, France should have bought 2 nuclear CATOBAR CVFs for the price the RN gets them, and RN should buy 2 CVFs worth complement of Rafale M/N at the price the MN got from Dassault.

    I think it would have been the more cost effective and efficient solution.

    (I added the Rafale N (biplace) because I think it would have a role to play as an advanced UCAV manager in the future).

    Nic

    Nuclear CVF for France for the same price as RN non nuclear ones?

    in reply to: More Chinooks for the RAF #2440338
    kev 99
    Participant

    A very good thing if true, a decent alternative to the ‘Medium rotocraft programme’ after all I can’t see any real chance that a big batch of Merlins would be delivered to soon and blackhawks would add another type to the MOD fleet which wouldn’t really be ideal.

    Further details/speculation here:

    http://www.military-world.net/Afghanistan/2738.html

    This bit:

    The entire Merlin fleet is likely to be “marinised” so it can be used by the Royal Navy but still available for land operations.

    Sounds pretty interesting as it opens up the opportunity to replace the RN Seakings with aircraft the RAF have which are in turn replaced by new Chinnoks.

    in reply to: Time again #2016719
    kev 99
    Participant

    but that does NOT make it a compromised design.

    That’s not to say that CdG didn’t have several problems that took time and money to be fixed and that could have been easily avoided with a less compromised but potentially more expensive design. But ask outside observers such as the USN and I’m sure they’ll tell you they respect the CdG a lot more than any of the STOVL carriers or the Russian carrier.

    So is it a compromised design or not then?

    BTW have they fixed the propulsion problems that saw her sent back to dry dock after refit earlier this year?

    in reply to: Time again #2016761
    kev 99
    Participant

    To be honest I think the CDG is too small, I’m sure there are very valid reasons why the Marine Nationale rejected the design when options for PA2 were considered.

    in reply to: Navy surrenders one new aircraft carrier in budget battle #2016966
    kev 99
    Participant

    +1 for Hawk as COIN aircraft.

    Shame we won’t be having traps on our carriers as otherwise I’m sure marinised one would be an option, after all the septics did it.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News from around the world – III #2443618
    kev 99
    Participant

    UK could arm its Watchkeeper UAVs
    By Craig Hoyle
    The UK could integrate a lightweight weapon with its Thales UK/Elbit Systems Watchkeeper 450 tactical unmanned air vehicles, operations of which should begin from late next year.

    “We are conducting analysis to investigate the contribution that an armed Watchkeeper UAV system could make in current and future operations,” confirms minister for international defence and security Baroness Taylor. The work is being conducted as part of the Ministry of Defence’s “routine capability planning process”, she says.

    Taylor’s comment represents the first time that the MoD has acknowledged the possibility of arming the British Army’s future WK450 air vehicles. However, the ministry adds: “We are still at an early stage of considering the benefits, and as yet no decisions regarding which munitions should be used have been made.”

    http://www.flightglobal.com/assets/getAsset.aspx?ItemID=18009

    One likely candidate for a weaponised version is Thales Air Systems’ lightweight multirole missile (LMM), which has previously been shown at exhibitions with a model of the WK450.

    Unveiled in mid-2008 and based on elements of Thales’s Starstreak ground-based air-defence weapon, the precision-guided LMM has a launch weight of around 13kg (28lb), including a 3kg warhead. Thales has previously said that production deliveries of the up to 8km (4.3nm) range weapon could be made from 2011.

    http://www.flightglobal.com/assets/getAsset.aspx?ItemID=23217

    Thales/Elbit joint venture U-TacS is building WK450 air vehicles at its Leicester production facility in the UK. Flight-test activities involving the type, which has already undergone extensive testing in Israel, should start before year-end at the ParcAberporth UAV centre of excellence in west Wales.

    http://www.flightglobal.com/assets/getAsset.aspx?ItemID=31429
    Watchkeeper air vehicles have already undergone testing in Israel

    Thales UK provides interim tactical UAV services for the UK armed forces in Afghanistan using unarmed Hermes 450s leased from Elbit. The larger WK450 design is derived from the Israeli system.

    The WK450 will have a maximum take-off weight of more than 450kg. It has a twin-payload configuration comprising an Elop Compass IV electro-optical/infrared sensor and the Thales I-Master synthetic aperture radar/ground moving target indication payload.

    Being acquired under a deal worth around £900 million ($1.48 billion), the Watchkeeper system is intended for use during intelligence, surveillance, target acquisition and reconnaissance tasks.

    The UK Royal Air Force already operates armed General Atomics MQ-9 Reaper UAVs over Afghanistan, with the type carrying Raytheon GBU-12 Paveway II precision-guided bombs and Lockheed Martin AGM-114 Hellfire air-to-surface missiles.

    http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2009/11/03/334323/uk-could-arm-its-watchkeeper-uavs.html

Viewing 15 posts - 931 through 945 (of 1,460 total)