dark light

kev 99

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,156 through 1,170 (of 1,460 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: RN FSC – C1/C2 hull & armament proposals #2029516
    kev 99
    Participant

    Wow, you weren’t joking were you.

    Looks pretty mean

    Is it a trimaran? Looks like its got outriggers.

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world #2029677
    kev 99
    Participant

    Pretty cool.

    in reply to: The Defence White Paper #2029898
    kev 99
    Participant

    Damn that’s going to cost a lot:cool:

    Interesting about the F35s maybe its a case of leaving options open and a small purchase of Bs will be studied?

    in reply to: Massive cost over run on CVF #2029906
    kev 99
    Participant

    I work in the NHS and if you could see the waste here you would be amazed. I imagine it’s the same in any public funded organisation. We had £25,000 the other week go down the pan because someone couldn’t check there spelling in a publication before it went to the printers. It’s all going to recycle heaven now. This ain’t the 1st time either. Take £10 billion out health, education and social security the world wouldn’t end up disaster. Red tape is costing this country so much. It used to take less civil servants to run the whole British Empire from London 100 years ago than work in the MOD today.
    Tahat tells you something. Roll on Bonfire of the quangos.

    I suspect there is a very great deal of fat to trim in the public sector, start with this Government’s obsession with measuring everything, I work in Market Research and my company receives more tender requests from various police forces than any other industry/sector and currently count 3 forces as current clients (with another 3 that we’ve done business with in the last 5 years). We do stuff for various clients of the NHS as well.

    in reply to: Massive cost over run on CVF #2029908
    kev 99
    Participant

    Yes we have world responsibilities, I would not advocate no power projection, but Nuclear weapons and strike carriers may no longer be the answer. I would love to live in a UK where we could afford to sustain the NHS, high quality state education and still build strike carriers etc, but it is just a dream, its not possible.

    How does a Navy do power projection without aircraft carriers then? use SSNs to lob a few Tomahawks inland? You’re not going to win a war doing just that.

    in reply to: Massive cost over run on CVF #2029912
    kev 99
    Participant

    Unite criticises Lib Dem MP over aircraft carrier contract

    1st July 2009

    Unite the union reacted with dismay after yesterday’s ‘predictable’ responses to the future of the MoD aircraft carrier contract after a leaked document suggested a £1 billion hike in cost to build the two vessels.

    The ranks of the ill-informed, including Willie Rennie MP who claimed that Labour is ‘busting the bank’, responded after a leak emanating from lead contractors for the construction of the two aircraft carriers.

    Alliance Management Board (AMB), suggested the possibility of 400-500 redundancies after the projected cost rose from £4 billion to £5 billion over the last year.

    However Unite, which has substantial membership at both the Rosyth and Clydeside yards that will undertake work on a significant bulk of the contract, have hit back suggesting that the likes of the Lib Dem member for Dunfermline & West Fife have missed the point completely.

    Unite national officer for aerospace and shipbuilding, Bernie Hamilton said: “When will these people realise that AMB’s ‘leak’ is designed to do one thing and one thing only and that is to force the government to agree to the increase in costs wanted by the employers (Carrier Alliance) for the extension to the in-service dates.

    “Those of us actually involved in the industry understood that the agreement to extend the build programme, to create a better payment schedule for the government, would come at an increased cost.

    “Predictably employers know only one way to force a Labour government into meeting their demands on costs and that is to publicly threaten hard working families and their future employment.

    “Mr Rennie and others have bought this leak hook, line and sinker and in their desperate efforts to make themselves look relevant to the electorate they have shown themselves to be political novices.”

    http://www.unitetheunion.com/news__events/latest_news/unite_criticises_lib_dem_mp_ov.aspx

    in reply to: Massive cost over run on CVF #2030063
    kev 99
    Participant

    Is this a case of the contractors giving unrealistic quotes just to secure the deal and then jacking it up after it’s signed.

    The MOD did state that there would be a cost increase due to stringing the contract out when the announcements were made. These new announcements state that the majority of the increase is down to this, although it won’t be clear until the end of July what the cost increases are.

    So basically the Government got the contract signed with allegedly lots of water tight guarantees for both parties and then a couple of months later went and changed it all, nice one:mad:

    in reply to: Massive cost over run on CVF #2030089
    kev 99
    Participant

    You naive fools he thinks that you can fight TWO wars on a peacetime budget.

    Hey, I’m just saying what Gordon Brown thinks. The fact that he outlined his grand vision for the future yesterday, without any costings or any indication of where the money is coming from while we are in the middle of a recession and on the same day as news like this comes out speaks volumes for me.

    in reply to: Massive cost over run on CVF #2030094
    kev 99
    Participant

    You can’t fight a war on a peace time budget!

    Gordon Brown seems to think overwise.

    in reply to: Massive cost over run on CVF #2030102
    kev 99
    Participant

    Plus you would have to factor in the cost of equipping dockyards and service maintenance personnel with imperial rather than metric tools.

    Never even thought of that:eek:

    in reply to: Massive cost over run on CVF #2030109
    kev 99
    Participant

    A Makin goes for about 2 billion USD = 1.2 billion GBP. Makes less for four Makins (incl penalty, or what about a third Albion?) than for two CVF (excl recent cost overrun). Plus could replace HMS Ocean. Looks like pretty much anything would give the Royal Navy more capability and cost less on a fleet level than those two CVF.

    Comparison: Cavour cost the Italians around 1 billion Euro = 0.85 billion GBP, now probably closer to 1 billion GBP.

    The CVF Cost overruns are being caused by the Government stringing the contract out, binning them for four Makin Island’s means they would get strung out too and there’s probably not much chance of licence built ones coming in at £1.2b.

    If you exclude the current overruns the CVF contract price is £4.9b, four Makins would cost £4.8b on your figures which only leaves £100m for cancellation costs, that’s probably way off the mark.

    Edit – Whoops wrong figure CVF contract price was £3.9bn!

    in reply to: Massive cost over run on CVF #2030144
    kev 99
    Participant

    Yess. I’m all for Cavours!

    A larger option would be to license-build Makin Island.

    Surely a license build of Makin Island would cost as almost as much as a CVF? When you factor in the costs associated with cancellation of the CVF contract it would probably be a lot more.

    Why replace them at all.

    Do we need Airpower at sea?

    Dave

    Yes.

    Why do you want to buy more T45s instead? They are built for protecting things, if CVF gets cancelled the only things they will have to protect will be Amphibs, the 6 that we already have will be more than adequate. Also a T45 has a unit price of £650m what you are proposing would cost £5.2b which will probably be as much as the CVF after increases.

    in reply to: Massive cost over run on CVF #2030192
    kev 99
    Participant

    The majority of the cost increases are down to the Government stretching the programme, nice one, save a bit of cash in the short term and force another Government to pick up the tab later on.

    in reply to: Massive cost over run on CVF #2030212
    kev 99
    Participant

    Yes it is true,

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8125449.stm

    Dump them, 8 more Type 45’s.

    Dave

    And replace the Invincibles with what?

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world #2030263
    kev 99
    Participant

    Does anyone else find the picture of a Typhoon submarine just cruising past the beach a little bit hard to belive. The people on the beach don’t even seem to notice there is a HUGE missile carrying sub about 50 yards offshore. Wouldn’t it be a bit risky to be that close to land. Anyone else think they have seen this picture before without the beach?

    Hopefully next time i’m down portobello beach HMS Vanguard can cruise buy. Maybe even fire off a couple of tridents just for show?

    It’s certainly a little on the surreal side.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,156 through 1,170 (of 1,460 total)