dark light

PilotDKH

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 310 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: A-10'S AND APACHES FOR AFGAN ARMY?? #2648515
    PilotDKH
    Participant

    It’s not a question of troop levels,it’s a question of priorities & commitment.The Taliban managed to take on the poppy growers & destroyed most of the crops with nothing more than bulldozers & fire.
    It’s a question of whether USA & it’s Afghani regime are willing to put resources & money into stopping production of the poison that their allies, who they depend on for security (the warlords),rely on for funds to maintain their militias & power!

    in reply to: General Discussion #375106
    PilotDKH
    Participant

    As long as idiots like that are banned from putting their small children on the sheep,then yeah.

    in reply to: A-10'S AND APACHES FOR AFGAN ARMY?? #2651480
    PilotDKH
    Participant

    What Afghanistan needs most of all,is a strong & commited national government.Attack aircraft can help a little,but they are not the answer.The Afghani government & USA need to be serious about tackling the warlords & their heroin production.At least the Taliban (students) made an effort to stop poppy growing & destroyed the crops,declaring heroin as “un-Islamic”.
    Now if the Taliban could destroy most of the poppy fields with bulldozers & burning;then it just goes to show that it’s a question of priorities (& lack of) for USA & the Afghani government.

    in reply to: 16 UH-1H FOR IRAQ #2653851
    PilotDKH
    Participant

    No lawndart.They are NOT Bell 412’s! They are Bell 212’s only!

    in reply to: 16 UH-1H FOR IRAQ #2655967
    PilotDKH
    Participant

    No jboyle.USMC uses Bell UH-1N,currently being replaced by Bell UH-1Y (NOT Bell 412). And UK uses 1 flight worth of Bell 212 (NOT Bell 412).

    in reply to: UK military plane crashes in Iraq #2655986
    PilotDKH
    Participant

    Exactly my point lawndart! I have not “already concluded” anything! That’s why,I started by saying “the story gets more strange as time goes on” & mentioned that there are now reports of a bomb.
    There is simply not enough evidence yet,to conclude what caused the crash!

    in reply to: UK military plane crashes in Iraq #2656035
    PilotDKH
    Participant

    The same tired excuse,traditionally used to dismiss discussion.You can’t seriously believe your spin? What’s “speculation” & “conspiracy theorist” got to do with the price of beef? It’s OBVIOUS who has “not been reading this thread before posting”;if you had,you would know that I have not once mentioned “speculation” or “conspiracy”!
    So much for the spin to try & dismiss any discussion!

    If it’s “speculation” & “conspiracy”,does that mean all the media is in a “conspiracy” when they report this bomb idea? The problem with reactionary dismissals is that they can’t credibly work,as they can’t credibly explain everyone else!

    As the video is very dark & blurred when the missile is fired,it’s impossible to see if it has fins or not.If it is a rocket,how do you know if it is not what shot down the plane? It’s just as possible.

    in reply to: 16 UH-1H FOR IRAQ #2656069
    PilotDKH
    Participant
    in reply to: UK military plane crashes in Iraq #2656092
    PilotDKH
    Participant

    Strange,especially as a video claims it was shot down.The video shows a long,narrow missile with white exhaust being fired into the sky.Interesting image if you pause the video when the missile is taking off.Can any see what kind of missile it is? Video is available free to download at http://www.ogrish.com
    You have to sign up free,before you can view it.

    in reply to: UK military plane crashes in Iraq #2656112
    PilotDKH
    Participant

    Hmm,the story gets more strange as time goes on.There are now reports that the plane was brought down by a bomb.Halfway down the page,on this link you read about it. http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/6BF51E9-EE8B-4006-B2F2-708F831001AB.htm

    in reply to: General Discussion #376161
    PilotDKH
    Participant

    Very surprised.I’d want to find out why they have the same mannerisms & speech,considering they are a different person & have not known me before.
    1 serious stalker!

    in reply to: General Discussion #376209
    PilotDKH
    Participant

    Do you mean the Palestinian boy shot while his dad tries to cover him? Yeah,I saw that on many TV channels & newspapers.Sad the israelis shot him in the head.He became a martyr in the Arab world & even non Arab Iran put his cowering image on a stamp!
    Great sadness worldwide when it happened.

    in reply to: General Discussion #376519
    PilotDKH
    Participant

    I vow to thee my country would be a better anthem.The best would have to be jupiter from the planets suite by Holst.Chamone THATS a tune! That would get salutes everytime its played.
    Next best,fanfare for the common man by Copeland.Those tunes are the best to replace the anthem.

    in reply to: General Discussion #376521
    PilotDKH
    Participant

    I vow to thee my country would be a better anthem.The best would have to be jupiter from the planets suite by Holst.Chamone THATS a tune! That woluld get salutes everytime its played.
    Next best,fanfare for the common man by Copeland.Those tunes are the best to replace the anthem.

    in reply to: General Discussion #376652
    PilotDKH
    Participant

    A “good bloke”??!!! You serious? After all that messing around with camilla on his wedding night to diana & throughout their marriage; & you think he’s a “good bloke”?

    But more importantly,why are they getting married now? It’s been fine so far for him to stay unmarried in his relationship to her,what’s changed?Why not continue like that? There’s more to this than is being said.What’s the benefit of this marriage?

Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 310 total)