Are you talking about something fresh off the factory floor and not painted yet?
Don’t you know anything better to say but urin and drug!! :rolleyes:
Looks like you have kidney problem m8! You Better visit Mr. Doctor.
The distance between satire and comprehension is often a two or three segment trip for some, but a few achieve it nonstop. :rolleyes:
I’ve run out of testing vials for all the urine drug testing I’d want to do on this thread…
Grumman Avenger:
United States
United Kingdom
Canada
Netherlands
France
You can add Brazil to this list as well. Did some digging and Brazil operated Avengers off the Minias Gerias before getting Trackers. That makes six users that operated the Avenger off carriers.
Ahhh the nostalgia of the 1980s and the Virginia-class strike cruiser (CGSN):

If I remember correctly the intent was to convert the USS Long Beach as an interim type strike cruiser to test the concepts/equipment operationally while the actual Virginia CGSN class would have had 8-12 hulls purpose built as strike cruisers.
We may simply be choosing not to create a huge psychological target. The US has from time to time mooted the naming of a vessel (usually a carrier) the United States but its generally been decided against since the loss of the USS US would be a great blow to national morale. Plus the history of the United States name is probably not to popular with the last two vessels slated to carry the name cancelled mid build 🙂
We did have a USS America at one time;) I know there’s a drive by some ex-America crew to lobby to get the CVN-X christened USS America…….and wasn’t the USS Harry S Truman originally slated to be named the USS United States?
Why would Finnish Air Force Buffaloes, Hurricanes, and Fokker fighters fit in with the theme of this thread?
I’d run out of testing vials from the urine drug tests we’d have to run on this thread.
Hence the Phantom’s nickname “The Great Smoking Thuderhog”!!
Thanks for the heads up on this one.
Found depictions of the FC-1 04 here:
http://bbs.tiexue.net/4920543/ShowThread.html
http://mil.qianlong.com/4919/2005/11/14/228@2883334.htm
The IDF/AF was greatly impressed when they got their first USAF F-4’s. They had been using the Navy model but, after they lost so many aircraft during the War of Yom Kippur, the USAF shipped from Germany new F-4’s to help replace the aircraft lost.
I thought the IDF only used the F-4E model? What US Navy models of the Phantom were they using?
In what ways does the FC-1 04 differ from the current FC-1 production standard?
Hi guys
Just asking because like to know do we have the technology to send humen to moon and keep him alive ?
and I seen on a program that apollo mission in 1969 was fake!!To link it to Modern Military Aviation section would be nice to have some info about when we gonna see a militery base on moon surface? My gues is about 40 years.
Kids, I’ll say it again. Just say NO. Now I know that a lot has transpired since the 1980s and whole “this is your brain on drugs” thing, but the answer is always NO to drugs.
We now return you to your regularly scheduled programming.
I believe there are some roadways earmarked as such in South Korea. I seem to recall browsing on Google Earth and finding straight stretches of roadways adjacent to the major airbases.
eventhough the Su-32FN is supersonic, the ASW must be carried out less than Mach 1, to hunt the sub-30 knot submarines.
It reminds me of the observation a comedian once made as to why a bass boat had to go 65mph- “I never seen bass that could swim that fast!”
The only value I can see is getting to the patrol areas faster.