dark light

Route Pack Six

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 89 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: F-14 Tomcat help please… #2577425
    Route Pack Six
    Participant

    Are you talking about something fresh off the factory floor and not painted yet?

    in reply to: Faked apollo Mission to Moon? #2577427
    Route Pack Six
    Participant

    Don’t you know anything better to say but urin and drug!! :rolleyes:
    Looks like you have kidney problem m8! You Better visit Mr. Doctor.

    The distance between satire and comprehension is often a two or three segment trip for some, but a few achieve it nonstop. :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Faked apollo Mission to Moon? #2577829
    Route Pack Six
    Participant

    I’ve run out of testing vials for all the urine drug testing I’d want to do on this thread…

    in reply to: Carrier based combat planes- most utilised? #2581539
    Route Pack Six
    Participant

    Grumman Avenger:

    United States
    United Kingdom
    Canada
    Netherlands
    France

    You can add Brazil to this list as well. Did some digging and Brazil operated Avengers off the Minias Gerias before getting Trackers. That makes six users that operated the Avenger off carriers.

    in reply to: New take on an old boat #2062117
    Route Pack Six
    Participant

    Ahhh the nostalgia of the 1980s and the Virginia-class strike cruiser (CGSN):

    http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ship/images/csgn-1-pic1.jpg

    If I remember correctly the intent was to convert the USS Long Beach as an interim type strike cruiser to test the concepts/equipment operationally while the actual Virginia CGSN class would have had 8-12 hulls purpose built as strike cruisers.

    in reply to: AWD names #2062123
    Route Pack Six
    Participant

    We may simply be choosing not to create a huge psychological target. The US has from time to time mooted the naming of a vessel (usually a carrier) the United States but its generally been decided against since the loss of the USS US would be a great blow to national morale. Plus the history of the United States name is probably not to popular with the last two vessels slated to carry the name cancelled mid build 🙂

    We did have a USS America at one time;) I know there’s a drive by some ex-America crew to lobby to get the CVN-X christened USS America…….and wasn’t the USS Harry S Truman originally slated to be named the USS United States?

    Route Pack Six
    Participant

    Why would Finnish Air Force Buffaloes, Hurricanes, and Fokker fighters fit in with the theme of this thread?

    in reply to: Faked apollo Mission to Moon? #2586831
    Route Pack Six
    Participant

    I’d run out of testing vials from the urine drug tests we’d have to run on this thread.

    in reply to: If you like Phantoms……. #2586833
    Route Pack Six
    Participant

    Hence the Phantom’s nickname “The Great Smoking Thuderhog”!!

    Thanks for the heads up on this one.

    in reply to: China's News, Pics and Speculation Part 9 #2587808
    Route Pack Six
    Participant
    in reply to: F-15N Sea Eagle #2587870
    Route Pack Six
    Participant

    The IDF/AF was greatly impressed when they got their first USAF F-4’s. They had been using the Navy model but, after they lost so many aircraft during the War of Yom Kippur, the USAF shipped from Germany new F-4’s to help replace the aircraft lost.

    I thought the IDF only used the F-4E model? What US Navy models of the Phantom were they using?

    in reply to: China's News, Pics and Speculation Part 9 #2587961
    Route Pack Six
    Participant

    In what ways does the FC-1 04 differ from the current FC-1 production standard?

    in reply to: Faked apollo Mission to Moon? #2587962
    Route Pack Six
    Participant

    Hi guys
    Just asking because like to know do we have the technology to send humen to moon and keep him alive ?
    and I seen on a program that apollo mission in 1969 was fake!!

    To link it to Modern Military Aviation section would be nice to have some info about when we gonna see a militery base on moon surface? My gues is about 40 years.

    Kids, I’ll say it again. Just say NO. Now I know that a lot has transpired since the 1980s and whole “this is your brain on drugs” thing, but the answer is always NO to drugs.

    We now return you to your regularly scheduled programming.

    in reply to: Using roads as runways? #2588642
    Route Pack Six
    Participant

    I believe there are some roadways earmarked as such in South Korea. I seem to recall browsing on Google Earth and finding straight stretches of roadways adjacent to the major airbases.

    in reply to: Supersonic ASW aircraft #2588753
    Route Pack Six
    Participant

    eventhough the Su-32FN is supersonic, the ASW must be carried out less than Mach 1, to hunt the sub-30 knot submarines.

    It reminds me of the observation a comedian once made as to why a bass boat had to go 65mph- “I never seen bass that could swim that fast!”

    The only value I can see is getting to the patrol areas faster.

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 89 total)