dark light

TEEJ

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 226 through 240 (of 2,134 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Missing Malaysian Airlines B777 #480233
    TEEJ
    Participant

    Possibly other debris from MH370 was burned by Mr Ferrier who is employed as a beach cleaner?

    MH370: ”Plane seat” found washed up on Reunion Island three months ago

    Yet Mr Ferrier had no idea of the significance of the object. Flotsam and jetsam washed up are part of his everyday life on the inhospitable beach, where nobody dares to enter the fierce waves and shark-infested waters.
    “I found a couple of suitcases too, around the same time, full of things,” he said, almost in passing.
    What did you do with them?
    “I burnt them,” he said, pointing to the pile of ashes lying on the boulders. “That’s my job. I collect rubbish, and burn it.
    “I could have found many things that belonged to the plane, and burnt them, without realising.”

    …..

    He also saw the wing which washed up on Wednesday – although in May, the barnacles encrusting its side were still alive. By the time it washed ashore again this week, the crustaceans were dead. “Like the seat, I didn’t know what it was. “I sat on it. I was fishing for macabi (bonefish) and used it as a table. I really didn’t pay it much attention – until I saw it on the news.” His story is backed up by that of another local woman, named only as Isabelle, who spotted the same object while walking on the beach in May, accompanied by her 10-year-old son. “It was the beginning of the holidays – around May 10,” she told local news website Zinfos974 “I was walking with my son, Krishna. Then from a rock on which we were standing, he saw an object and shouted: ‘Mum, that looks like the wing of a plane!'” Krishna then jumped on what looked like a suitcase. He managed to prise it open, and then spotted another suitcase buried in the black sand.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/mh370/11777921/MH370-Plane-seat-found-washed-up-on-Reunion-Island-three-months-ago.html

    in reply to: Missing Malaysian Airlines B777 #480237
    TEEJ
    Participant

    It appears that the flaperon was discovered further up the beach about a month ago. The person didn’t realise the significance of the part and didn’t report it.

    Sky News UK ran a piece to camera from the island on the flaperon being spotted earlier. The claim was that others have come forward to say that they had seen the same aircraft part a month ago in the surf. The claim was that it was spotted at a different location further up the beach. Possibly the claim is true? Possibly the people that have come forward just dismissed it at the time as a piece of old boat wreckage?

    Another group of people told Sky News they saw what could have been the same debris a month ago, further up the beach, meaning it could have been floating around the Reunion coast for some time.

    Video at following link.

    Video: MH370 Debris Found ‘A Month Ago’

    http://news.sky.com/story/1528673/mh370-man-describes-moment-he-found-wing-piece

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 14 #2158971
    TEEJ
    Participant

    Tu-95 Bear strategic bomber crashes near Khabarovsk, Russia

    http://rt.com/news/273520-tu95-bomber-crash-russia/

    I was monitoring the Bear ground control HF Voice/Morse network earlier this morning. The ground control was sending the usual marker beacons indicating that aircraft were in the air. The markers have now stopped.

    in reply to: Su 27 Flanker intercepting a Portuguese P-3 Orion #2164063
    TEEJ
    Participant

    How about the IR section of the video? The jets are BLACK, and then with no delay at all, WHITE.

    Please explain this instantaneous massive temperature variation, which doesn’t happen in the real world at all.

    The video is fake. Why does it matter so much to you that everyone believes it to be real?

    Is it because this is part of a Russian propaganda exercise?

    Do you not think that switching between modes can’t be achieved with a press of a button? It is that simple. Why do you think that an operator can’t switch between various modes at will?

    A repost of the video so that people can follow. See 1:51. Can you not see that it is simply the sensor operator switching between modes?

    Wescam videos. Can you not understand that the operator only has to select the mode at a touch of a button? It isn’t rocket science!

    in reply to: Su 27 Flanker intercepting a Portuguese P-3 Orion #2164254
    TEEJ
    Participant

    The Lockheed P-3 Orion doesn’t have any windows from which the props can be seen from underneath, so what window was that footage shot from?
    Answer: It wasn’t shot from any window, as the whole thing is fake.

    Why aren’t the flaps on the supposed Flanker working? Because the whole thing is fake.

    Why are you claiming that it was filmed from a window? You can clearly see the underbelly of the P-3. Did it ever cross your mind that it was an underbelly sensor that filmed the Su-27?

    See following video from 5:38. See from 5:58. Note the nose turret and the undercarriage bay directly behind it. The closed bay doors is what you see in the video that you are claiming is fake.

    Repost of the P-3/Su-27 video as the original OP video link is no longer hosting it.

    See underbelly.

    http://www.airplane-pictures.net/photo/427117/14811-portugal-air-force-lockheed-p-3c-orion/

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/601_Squadron_(Portugal)#/media/File:Lockheed_P-3C_Orion,_Portugal_-_Air_Force_JP7495968.jpg

    Looks to me like it was filmed via the nose sensor turret. In the video you can see the closed bays as the sensor operator is tracking the Su-27 approaching from behind and eventually passing on the starboard side. That is why you see the P-3 belly and the props as the operator tracks with the turret.

    http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-wNe_d5LjI0c/VMy6xTLPAkI/AAAAAAAAiCg/rlitCTXOwTo/s1600/P3K%2BAirel%2BK.png

    Explain why the Su-27s can formate and station keep with the aircraft in the following video? Why does the Flanker need to in your thought process deploy “flaps”. Sometimes all that is required is a little speed brake if required.

    in reply to: North Korean MiG-23/29/Su-7s – any photos? #2165416
    TEEJ
    Participant
    in reply to: Su 27 Flanker intercepting a Portuguese P-3 Orion #2165447
    TEEJ
    Participant
    in reply to: Su 27 Flanker intercepting a Portuguese P-3 Orion #2165449
    TEEJ
    Participant

    I suppose this is fake as well?

    https://youtu.be/ePTu1NLCb8o

    It is a mindset with these people. Everything is a conspiracy! No doubt he will be “analysing” these Flankers and claiming the footage as “fake”.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 14 #2165983
    TEEJ
    Participant

    Russia suspends Tu-95 Bear flights after 8th June 2015 accident at Ukrainka.

    http://tass.ru/en/russia/799571

    Looks like the Tu-95MS Bear H have returned to the skies after the tragic accident.

    The Bear H Morse Code ground control station has resumed broadcasting Marker beacons this morning. When the Tu-95MS are flying the ground control transmits Morse beacon markers on the hour and every twenty minutes for a two minute period. Beacon markers active as of 0600 UTC.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 14 #2173339
    TEEJ
    Participant

    Russia suspends Tu-95 Bear flights after 8th June 2015 accident at Ukrainka.

    MOSCOW, June 8. /TASS/. A Tupolev Tu-95 strategic bomber overran the take-off runway in Russia’s Amur Region, the press service of the Russian Defense Ministry reported Monday.
    “The accident occurred during a practice flight at the Ukrainka airfield in the Amur region at 17:00 Moscow time. The Tu-95 ran over the runway during acceleration. There was no ammunition
    onboard. According to preliminary information, engine fire was the cause behind the accident,” the ministry said. Flights of Tu-95 strategic bombers have been suspended, the ministry said.
    “The commander-in-chief of the Russian air forces has ordered to suspend Tu-95 flights for a period of investigation,” the press service said.

    http://tass.ru/en/russia/799571

    in reply to: Military Aviation News-2015 #2206053
    TEEJ
    Participant

    Boeing KC-135R Stratotanker.

    US Air Force Jet Goes Missing Over English Channel

    by Staff Reports
    100th Air Refueling Wing Public Affairs

    4/29/2015 – RAF MILDENHALL, England — A KC-135 Stratotanker with call sign QUID 72 experienced an in-flight emergency at approximately 12:20 a.m. today. It safely returned to RAF Mildenhall at 1:20 a.m. There were no injuries.

    Safety is paramount to the success of our mission. The Air Force’s stringent safety standards help ensure the well-being of our people and the communities we interact with.

    http://www.mildenhall.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123446539

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon discussion and news 2015 #2207413
    TEEJ
    Participant
    in reply to: MiG-25 vs F-4 in Iran-Iraq war #2207636
    TEEJ
    Participant

    The SR-71 was almost hit, only an inept proximity fuse on an SA-2 prevented it, not the aircraft’s speed. Missile passed it head-on, if the fuse had gone off on time, the SR-71 would have been downed.

    Are you thinking about the A-12 (Sortie BX6734, CIA Pilot Denny Sullivan) with SA-2 shrapnel damage over North Vietnam?

    Under Fire over Vietnam
    North Vietnam fired SAMs at BLACK SHIELD A-12s three times but caused damage only once. The first attempted shootdown occurred on the 16th mission on 28 October 1967. Flown by Dennis Sullivan, the aircraft was on its second pass, approaching Hanoi from the west, when an SA-2 was launched at it. Photographs taken during the mission show missile smoke above the SAM site and the missile and its contrail, heading down and away from the aircraft. The A-12’s ECMs worked well, and the SAM, which was fired too late, was never a threat. [13]

    The second incident, two days later, on the 18th mission, was the closest an OXCART aircraft ever came to being shot down. Sullivan again was the pilot. On the first pass between Hanoi and Haiphong, radar tracking detected two SAM sites preparing to launch, but neither did. On the second pass toward Hanoi and Haiphong from the west, at least six missiles were fired from sites around the capital. The A-12 was flying at Mach 3.1 at 84,000 feet. Looking out the rear-view periscope, Sullivan reported seeing six vapor trails go up to about 90,000 feet behind the aircraft, arc over, and begin converging on it. He saw four missiles—one as close as 100 to 200 yards away—and three detonations behind the A-12. Six missile contrails appeared on mission photography.

    A post-flight inspection at Kadena found that a piece of metal, probably debris from an exploded missile, had penetrated the lower right wing and lodged near the fuel tank. A BLACK SHIELD officer at Kadena noted that the A-12 pilots were “showing considerable anxiety about overflying this area before we get some answers.” Helms ordered that missions be temporarily suspended. None was flown until 8 December. It and the following one two days later photographed the Cambodia-Laos-South Vietnam triborder area and were not sent over the North. [14]

    https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/books-and-monographs/a-12/finding-a-mission.html

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_A-12

    https://www.cia.gov/news-information/featured-story-archive/2013-featured-story-archive/images/a12damage002.jpg/452892fc-9a06-4001-adb5-7a3bdd72e9d8.jpeg

    but the post-flight inspection crew made a surprising discovery: two small pieces of metal had penetrated the plane’s lower right wing and lodged against the support structure by the wing’s fuel tank. The fragments were not warhead pellets, but may have been part of the debris from one of the missile detonations near the plane.

    https://www.cia.gov/news-information/featured-story-archive/2013-featured-story-archive/pieces-of-history-missile-debris-from-a-12-oxcart.html

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon discussion and news 2015 #2207658
    TEEJ
    Participant
    in reply to: MiG-25 vs F-4 in Iran-Iraq war #2210197
    TEEJ
    Participant

    History proves you wrong. First lock-on on SR-71 has been achieved on 31-Jan-1986. As the Foxhound pilot claimed, he did not shoot because the Blackbird did not dare to violate Soviet air space. On 03-Jun-1986, six MiG-31s have performed a coordinated trap on an SR-71 over the Barents Sea and achieved multiple lock-ons. This interception has effectively stopped further SR-71 recon missions over the Soviet Union.

    Since when were SR-71s overflying the Soviet Union?

    See following from 1 hour 18.

    Their peacetime mission in regards to the Soviet Union and China was periphery using slant sensors.

    http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB74/U2-45.pdf

Viewing 15 posts - 226 through 240 (of 2,134 total)