The Mystery of ‘Carlos the Spanish Air Traffic Conroller’
The Mystery of ‘Carlos the Spanish Air Traffic Controller’
‘Carlos’ has history with Russia Today and an apparent gripe with Ukrainian Government. If the posts made on the social media account of Carlos are to be believed then he will be a star witness in any international investigation. Here is ‘Carlos’ giving an interview to the Spanish language version of Russia Today during May 2014.
Someone must be able to recognize this individual even though he is partially obscured?
All very, very strange. The video description has his job down as Air Traffic Control. Was the Twitter feed of Carlos an easy target for a bit of devious hacking by the Pro-Russian brigade that is very active on the internet?
Google translation of the video description
Published on 8 May 2014
Express what one thinks about the crisis in Ukraine can even lead to an alien to be forced to flee for their lives Kiev. It is the case of a Spanish air traffic controller who was threatened by supporters of the Maidan.Carlos, who spoke with RT on the condition of anonymity, has received threats despite not defending any interest. “I have my opinion and my view of a normal person, with a separate work [unrelated] or media, or any political party, nor to any association.”
Had threatened to kill him, to send him to “do not know what battalion” and out of the country. “They asked me whether my death, because it gave a point of view very different from yours,” he said.
TEEJ could you please post your excellent work on this (in)famous BUK TELAR debunking claims by Russian generals during yesterday press conference.
What do you think about this mysterious UFO (oh I am sorry “hoovering” SU25 (sic!)- who needs F35B ) appearing just after MH17 was hit in the recording of Rostov ATC? For me it is part of the plane (starboard wing or tail section ) after the plane disintegrated.
Posted. I take no credit for it other than searching round the web for bits and bobs. The people that have done the real work are the individuals that have matched up the imagery to the video. How the hell did the Russians not double check and triple check those Krasnoarmeysk social media claims? It just staggers belief! When I seen the video portion highlighted in the brief I fully expected to see imagery and ground shots in order to rub the Ukrainian Governments noses in it.
I too came to that debris/break up theory. It obviously is just a theory but should be investigated thoroughly No offence but if their military intelligence can’t get the Buk video correct then what have they mis-interpreted in the radar analysis? I know that some individuals on PPRuNE with ATC involvement have expressed that theory that a break up could generate a return. The Russians are obviously going to hand over all the data to the investigation so it will be interesting to see what the experts make of it?
Comments received:
The video has been shot at Krasnoarmeysk (Красноармейск). The billboard is an advertising of car dealer located at Krasnoarmeysk, Dnepropetrovskaya str. 34. (Красноармейск Днепропетровская, 34).
The town is controlled by Ukrainian army.
The location in the footage has been tracked down to Luhansk just like the Ukrainians claimed it to be. Ouch! Looks like the Russians simply took the above claim off social media and ran with it without checking. Maybe Russian Intelligence should start employing some of the internet sleuths to double check their work? 🙂
Putin won’t be happy! Looks like there is going to be some Generals on Putin’s carpet with hats on after this blunder! How many DVD copies of the brief was the Russian Ambassador to Malaysia dishing out along with claiming that the separatists did not have Buk?
Screenshot from the Russian brief.

Footage link up to Luhansk. Please click on large link for higher resolution.

See following link for larger image.
http://std3.ru/de/2e/1406044749-de2e48df022def402617c93cb666333f.jpeg
Map links to area in Luhansk
https://www.google.com/maps/@48.5447808,39.2651895,1262m/data=!3m1!1e3
Obviously the ground images used are historic (around 2012) and the blue billboard in the foreground does not show the Bogdan Autos advert.
The following image was taken in July 2014 and shows that the blue billboard in Luhansk has the current advert.

Bogdan Autos billboard advert.

Facebook post from Ukrainian Minister of Internal affairs, Arsen Avakov, on the 19th July stating that the video was taken in Luhansk.

Original video of Buk on trailer.
Link to map of area
https://www.metabunk.org/sk/Google_Earth_2014-07-22_12-52-02_2014-07-22_12-52-24.jpg
From
https://www.metabunk.org/threads/claim-buk-launcher-trucked-out-of-ukraine.3977/page-3#post-117620
See following link for compilation of Buk recorded activity in Ukraine. It includes a link to another Buk movement convoy recorded on 17/7/14 heading towards Torez.
https://www.metabunk.org/threads/claim-buk-launcher-trucked-out-of-ukraine.3977/page-4#post-117786
https://www.metabunk.org/threads/claim-buk-launcher-trucked-out-of-ukraine.3977/
Russian MH17 briefing with Buk missile video portion at 25:00
And this is paralay “chaff”
https://www.flickr.com/photos/jeroenakkermans/14698656261/in/set-72157645790319631/Looks more like cellophane to me (for wrapping cargo?)TEEJ what you think?
It could very well be. Good find! It really is amazing how much mileage the chaff non-sense is getting. They don’t care as long as they can get hits and especially hits on that all too important ‘click to donate button’ Sad really!
[QUOTE=lukos;2155228]
Why not just fix the broken conversion process rather than calling people conspiracy theorists for looking at a date which they got wrong and drawing the logical conclusion.
It isn’t a logical conclusion in the case of the die-hard conspiracy theorists in these cases though. They know exactly what they are doing and they go looking for it from the outset. It is a mindset and all the conspiracy websites do it and get very rich out of doing it too. They don’t care as long as they suck in the gullible and naive. I think we have exhausted the time stamp discussion and I won’t comment on it further. Thanks.
Why not just fix the time stamp issue?
The time stamp issue is explained at following link. Nothing to fix other than the mindset of some die-hard conspiracy loons who know exactly how to spin metadata.
Rather unfair to the muppet, that picture, because immediately afterwards he put the toy back down, crossed himself and looked pretty solemn.
Yes my apologies. I got ahead of myself with the idiotic claims of parlay and his ‘chaff’. The muppet term was not about him holding up the toy but his bullish actions, IMHO, in ordering about investigators and observers attempting to gain access to the area. My apologies once again.
Going back to the claims of ‘chaff’ in the video posted by Paralay the cargo manifest has been released. Textiles are listed so you can imagine large fabric rolls streaming down.
http://www.ibtimes.com/cargo-manifest-flight-mh17-reveals-pets-diplomatic-mail-board-1632708
Says the father, according to her son.
“… out of the clouds seemed two aircraft. Both aircraft were shot down with a single shot”
So where is the wreckage of this ‘second’ aircraft?
What happened to your belief in the theory about the chaff? Shouldn’t this muppet be holding up streams of this ‘chaff’ rather than a childs toy?
[ATTACH=CONFIG]230373[/ATTACH]
Well, this is the problem because it’s really just a claim in the first case. It’s a blog, not an official news channel. There is no proof of time or location. For all anyone knows that video was shot 2 years ago after a military exercise, or it’s a Ukrainian battery.
Of course it is just a claim. I never claimed anything else other than directing you to the video in question. It could be easily disproved by the claimant or others providing photographic proof. The video has been shown enough times on Russia Today so if the woman’s claims are true then it should be only a matter of time before the video is discredited.
Seems to me that it’s more a case of YouTube adopting retarded time stamping policies and people making what would otherwise be logical judgements, were it not for YouTube’s idiocy.
Oh good grief! No it is simply down to die-hard conspiracy loons that use the known time stamp issues for their own conspiracy nut interests. It is the easy option for them and they know it in order to suck people into their click to donate websites and get hits on their videos.
Down load recording, download MediaInfo, see when coded stream. This video was prepared the day before the tragedy!
This is an example of some people naively falling for the claims of the crazy die-hard conspiracy theorists and their You Tube compilations. The reality is that the day behind time stamp error is due to the YouTube encoding servers being behind by 1 day at that time.
Download the following video by Obama who is commenting on the MH17 tragedy. He obviously made the speech on the 17th but the time stamp is for the 16th. No doubt the crazy conspiracy die-hards will start using the Obama video with the time stamp showing the day before!
Analysis at following links.
An example of the time stamp lunacy. Is it any wonder that he disabled comments shortly after he uploaded it?
Comments received:
The video has been shot at Krasnoarmeysk (Красноармейск). The billboard is an advertising of car dealer located at Krasnoarmeysk, Dnepropetrovskaya str. 34. (Красноармейск Днепропетровская, 34).
The town is controlled by Ukrainian army.
Yes I have seen that so it should be easy for the poster, journalists etc, to take images of the location and match them exactly with the location in the video. Anyone can make such a claim but it needs to be confirmed with photographic proof otherwise it just ends up as yet another counter claim. I checked on the google maps but that area is not covered by ground images.
I find the display program quite lacking.
Nic
You should have fast forwarded it, Nic. The 2016 show was amazing! 😀
Where?
See following with truck and trailer claimed to have transported the Buk in and out of Ukraine.
http://ukraineatwar.blogspot.nl/2014/07/russian-transport-of-buk-into-ukraine.html
http://ukraineatwar.blogspot.nl/2014/07/russian-transport-of-buk-that-shot-down.html
[ATTACH=CONFIG]230309[/ATTACH]
Looks like stabilizer parts. Possible warhead fragmentation damage?
[ATTACH=CONFIG]230307[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]230308[/ATTACH]
http://pissinontheroses.blogspot.fi/2014/07/alert-777-shoot-down-video-shows-chaff.html
I gather all the information you like it or not.
But is isn’t ‘information’. It is desperate clutching at straws and you fell for it. The person that created that webpage and went for the chaff theory is clueless so why did you fall for it? Think about it? The separatists control that area so why is this ‘chaff’ not being documented, collected by the separatists, journalists and international observers in the region? The Russians authorities will have been all over this footage and pointing out this ‘chaff’ theory if it had any credibility. Ask yourself why they are not? Also ask yourself why the separatists are not sowing the crash area with this ‘chaff’ that you claim is in the footage?
So here is your chance. Why not contact the Russian Ministry of Defence and inform them that you have ‘smoking gun’ evidence.
http://eng.mil.ru/en/contacts.htm
Tomcat wrote
Thx for the correction. Will delete my entry commenting the vid.
No problem.