Out of interest who is the guy in the photograph?
An idiot that likes posing as a member or ex-member of HM Forces. Until he was rumbled he had an active Facebook page.
Photo posted on his FB page during March.

Some recent example of others that like to dress up and fake military or service history.
Out of interest who is the guy in the photograph?
An idiot that likes posing as a member or ex-member of HM Forces. Until he was rumbled he had an active Facebook page.
Photo posted on his FB page during March.

Some recent example of others that like to dress up and fake military or service history.
No problem, Jim. Thanks for the reply.
————–
The following Walter Mitty character was photographed by a news photographer at Woolwich. Why do these idiots think that they won’t be found out? The media labelled him as an “SAS Captain”.

No problem, Jim. Thanks for the reply.
————–
The following Walter Mitty character was photographed by a news photographer at Woolwich. Why do these idiots think that they won’t be found out? The media labelled him as an “SAS Captain”.

My criticism is of the nature of the ammunition they are restricted to.
Moggy
According to the following hollow point 9mm was standard issue from May 2011 to MPS.
Freedom of Information Request
http://www.met.police.uk/foi/pdfs/disclosure_2012/september_2012/2012070003365.pdf
My criticism is of the nature of the ammunition they are restricted to.
Moggy
According to the following hollow point 9mm was standard issue from May 2011 to MPS.
Freedom of Information Request
http://www.met.police.uk/foi/pdfs/disclosure_2012/september_2012/2012070003365.pdf
Jim, It was a French soldier on patrol.
French soldier stabbed while on patrol near Paris
(Reuters) – A French soldier patrolling a business neighborhood west of Paris was stabbed in the neck and injured on Saturday by a man who fled the scene and is being sought by police, President Francois Hollande said.
The 23-year-old was patrolling in uniform with two other soldiers as part of France’s Vigipirate anti-terror surveillance plan when he was approached from behind around 6 p.m. and attacked with a knife or a box-cutter.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/05/25/us-france-stabbing-idUSBRE94O09420130525
Jim, It was a French soldier on patrol.
French soldier stabbed while on patrol near Paris
(Reuters) – A French soldier patrolling a business neighborhood west of Paris was stabbed in the neck and injured on Saturday by a man who fled the scene and is being sought by police, President Francois Hollande said.
The 23-year-old was patrolling in uniform with two other soldiers as part of France’s Vigipirate anti-terror surveillance plan when he was approached from behind around 6 p.m. and attacked with a knife or a box-cutter.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/05/25/us-france-stabbing-idUSBRE94O09420130525
The aircraft mechanism found behind the Ground Zero “mosque” site belongs to a Boeing 767 — the same model as the airliners used on 9/11 at the World Trade Center, police confirmed yesterday.
But aviation experts say a number stamped on the wreckage will likely not help determine which of the two 767s it came from.
That number — BOEING CSTG 65B84045 — is a “casting number” not unique to the part or to the plane, said Alan Lery of Turbo Resources International, an Arizona aircraft-parts seller.
It’s possible a number of parts on the mechanism have the same designation, he explained.
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/manhattan/serial_is_no_tell_tale_evidence_R8XHAhy7NSl2FxhQg3mhDM
An Engineer on Airliners has looked up the part in the 767 Parts Cat.
767 Illustrated Parts Catalog
Boeing Casting
Searching for “65B84045-1”
65B84045-1 .CLAMP
ACTUATOR INSTL-TE FLAP DRIVE POSITION NO.4 AND NO.5 27 – 51 – 05 001 50 3
——————————————————————————–65B84045-1 .CLAMP
ACTUATOR INSTL-POSITION NO.3 AND 6 TE FLAP DRIVE 27 – 51 – 11 001 30 3
——————————————————————————–65B84045-1 .CLAMP
ACTUATOR INSTL-POSITION NO.2 AND 7 TE FLAP DRIVE 27 – 51 – 22 001 45 3
——————————————————————————–65B84045-1 .CLAMP
ACTUATOR INSTL-POSITION NO. 1 AND 8 TE FLAP DRIVE 27 – 51 – 22 002 35 3
The chaps over there do a nice tie up with the following graphic.

http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/general_aviation/read.main/5748603/
Amazing!! what happened to the rest of the wreckage??
Some wreckage of UAL Flight 175 was recovered north of WTC after impact.
I would expect that this is wreckage from Boeing 767 Flight 175 (WTC 2)? Pieces of landing gear and engine were already recovered from the Park Place area. See link to graphic.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:World_Trade_Center,_NY_-_2001-09-11_-_Debris_Impact_Areas.svg
After the plane penetrated through the tower, part of the plane’s landing gear and fuselage came out the north side of the tower and crashed through the roof and two of the floors of 45–47 Park Place, between West Broadway and Church Street, (600 feet (180 meters)) north of the former World Trade Center. The plane parts destroyed three floor beams, and severely compromised the building’s internal structure………..
Some debris from the aircraft were recovered nearby, including landing gear found on top of a building on the corner of West Broadway and Park Place, an engine found at Church & Murray Street, and a section of the fuselage landed on top of 5 World Trade Center.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Airlines_Flight_175
The recent part found has a serial number of 65B84045

’65B84045-1 CLAMP’
http://www.partslogistics.com/demo/search-part_num-65B840451.html
nice examples include Phaid’s avatar which was claimed by the americans to have been a captured video recording from an Iraqi MiG29’s FDR before a sparrow missile hit it (that they captured by flying an SF team to the crash site inside iraq of the mig29 and recovering the FDR)… LOL! the fact that people believe such an outlandish nonsense even 22 years after the war ended shows us much… 😉
This is what I mean about revisionism and the staunch belief that events never took place. Yes the recovery at the MiG-29 crash site did take place. I was serving at the time, read the report and saw the images. Think about it? Did it ever cross your mind that SF teams were in the area and assisted with the recovery of equipment from the crash site? I didn’t read a fabricated report and neither did Underhill or Rodriguez.
Exploitation took place whenever it was deemed suitable to do so. The teams that took part in Operation Have Nose were involved with the handling and processing of the data recovered from the MiG-29 crash site.
http://www.nasicaa.org/havenose.pdf
Image credit Steven Meckler (AIM-7 fired by Craig Underhill)

Over Cesar Rodriguez’s desk hangs a macabre souvenir of his decades as a fighter pilot. It is a large framed picture, a panoramic cockpit view of open sky and desert. A small F-15 Eagle is visible in the distance, but larger and more immediate, filling the center of the shot, staring right at the viewer, is an incoming missile.
It is a startling picture, memorializing a moment of air-to-air combat from January 19, 1991, over Iraq. Air-to-air combat has become exceedingly rare. Even when it happens, modern fighter pilots are rarely close enough to actually see the person they are shooting at. This image recalls a kill registered by Rodriguez, who goes by Rico, and his wingman, Craig Underhill, known as Mole, during the Gulf War.
A special-operations team combed the Iraqi MiG’s crash site, and this was one of the items salvaged, the last millisecond of incoming data from the doomed Iraqi pilot’s HUD, or head-up display. It was the final splash of light on his retinas, probably arriving too late for his brain to process before being vaporized with the rest of his corporeal frame. Pilots like Rodriguez don’t romanticize such exploits. These are strictly matter-of-fact men from a world where war is work, and life and death hang on a rapidly and precisely calibrated reality, an attitude captured by the flat caption mounted on the frame: THIS IS AN AIM-7 AIR-TO-AIR MISSILE SHOT FROM AN F-15 EAGLE DETONATING ON AN IRAQI MIG-29 FULCRUM DURING OPERATION DESERT STORM.
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2009/03/the-last-ace/307291/1/
They only got a handful of tanks and APCs and some SAMs. Most of them survived, and shot at the americans &co until the last day of the war.
Not quite. 136 Armoured Fighting Vehicles were declared lost. The ‘handful’ was bandied about and obviously seems to have stuck as most ‘believers’ focused on Main Battle Tank claims. The true losses were revealed when Yugoslavia returned to the Vienna Document and Dayton Accords. Yes the BDA in reality to real armour was way out due to decoys but the figures were skewed in relation when you take in all armour.
When the Yugoslavs returned to the Vienna Document and Dayton Accord the losses were 18 MBT and 136 AFVs. Obviously not all those admitted destroyed remained in Kosovo. During the Technical Withdrawal the Serbs were noted pulling out as much damaged/destroyed/disabled armour as possible. As much to deny NATO the BDA as well as spares recovery.
The last exchange of information under Vienna Document/Dayton Accord pre conflict was in January 1999 with the Yugoslavs declaring 152 combat-capable. When they rejoined post conflict the declaration was 102 combat declared aircraft. The Yugoslavs lost 50 combat-capable aircraft out of their declared combat capable inventory. The highest number of losses by type was MiG-21s. 11 of the 16 MiG-29 were lost to all causes during the conflict. Quite a surprise to those after the conflict who believed totally the Yugoslav Information Ministry version of events. The reality was Yugoslavia’s declarations when returning to the various treaties.
Really?! Please do tell more, it’s fascinating.
You mean revisionism is fascinating! All the visual ID’s recounted here were all made up? Really? Was Rodriguez battling a “speck on his Windscreen”:rolleyes:
Rodriguez – MiG-29 engagement.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epQoceuzuJA&t=31m33s
Pitts – MiG-25 engagement.
Is there a link to these explanations?
That old ‘Aurora’ thread is likely the one dating back to 2000?
http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?t=6286
The UK MoD declassified a paper on Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) in the UK Air Defence Region.
Of interest is the two covert aircraft types (text and images) that have been edited out in the section covering.
Working Paper No.9 ‘Black’ and Other Aircraft as UAP Events.
Possibly one of those edited out types is U-2? The description of the Figures 1 to 9 states that certain aspects of these vehicles may be described as ‘saucer like’. The U-2 obviously with the pods on the spine could cover that at a stretch. The other classified type could well be the MoD being very anal about the RC-135s operating out of the UK but hard to see where the ‘saucer like’ comes from? Especially with the similarities with the KC-135 and E-3 Sentry. Is the answer to what Chris Gibson saw one of the types edited out in the MoD DIS paper?
Cherry Ripe agreed. Apologies for the misinterpretation. Correct, there had to be a cut off point during the intense negotiations. Types such as the FB-111 and Tu-22M were negotiated out. In the end it was narrowed down to heavy strategic nuclear bombers.
During the early discussions the Soviets wanted types such as the F-4 and F-111 to be counted purely because they were capable of carrying free fall nuclear weapons with large megatonnage at strategic levels. The Russians particularly highlighted the US carrier fleet types such as the F-4 and wanted them to be counted as strategic platforms.