dark light

Maticash

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Maticash
    Participant

    Thanks to all for the assistance, most helpful – thus far I’ve been able to positively identify (as far as I can tell!) four of the wrecks I visited up there, with another six still to be ID’ed (if possible). Still have a bit of working backwards from the information I have on what aircraft should be there with some of the other official sources of primary information out there.

    One of the main problems I’ve identified is that only some parts of some wrecks were recovered, and my research has not been able to definitively identify which pieces were recovered and which weren’t (yet). For instance, A9-535 is listed as having been salvaged in 1974 on the Goodall website and I assumed that meant it had been completely recovered, however when I got out there I found the forward fuselage section of that aircraft (picture below) looking pretty much as it did on page 64 of Pacific Aircraft Wrecks – very useful in helping to ID the wreck!!

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]256105[/ATTACH]

    Maticash
    Participant

    Hi Andrew

    Thank you – that is fantastic information and a big help. Can you provide a bit more detail on why the later RF numbers are out (ie why were the ‘correct’ ##’s taken out of production)?

    To provide a bit of context, both the wrecks I listed were visited up at Tadji (so your research is spot on there!) and are among several partial Beaufort airframes that are still located there. I’ve researched which aircraft were written off at Tadji through the adf-serials website and which ones have been subsequently salvaged, and am now trying to line up which ones ‘should’ still be there with the aircraft on site- so far I have likely ID’s on four of the hulks I visited – your information lines up with two of the aircraft that should remain on site. Much of the paintwork was either weathered away or obscured by organic material (mosses, etc) so ID’s from painted serials/SQN codes was difficult in the time I had on site (almost impossible to be honest) so being able to find the inspection plates on a couple of the wrecks was a big help. There were some stern fuselages located there but all had been separated from the RF components that remained; likewise, identification of any painted serials was difficult on these components.

    I have quite a few photos you are likely to find interesting and will post some more later today or tomorrow when I have a chance.

    Thanks again, this information is really appreciated

    in reply to: Japanese WWII Aircraft Inspection Stamps #825308
    Maticash
    Participant

    Hi TonyT, thanks for that – I’ve had a look at that website in the past and didn’t find what I was after, will have another look through though to make sure I’ve gone over everything properly. I have also tried to join the discussion forums on that site but no luck so far, they seem to be doing everything manually (you have to email for access) but I’ve had no response to my request as yet.

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)