dark light

ijozic

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 533 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2135376
    ijozic
    Participant

    I thought Su-34 was intended as an interdiction aircraft similar to the F-111, F-15E or Su-24. The armor for the crew has me rethinking that however. Just what was it designed to do? The Russians have done their best to confuse everybody about the thing, even back when they referred to as the Su-32 and photographed it on a carrier landing approach even though one could see it lacked the modifications for that.

    Confuse whom exactly? The export variant is still advertised as Su-32FN.

    Regarding the carrier landing approach, ‘one could see that it lacked modifications for that’? I guess this ‘one’ somehow missed noticing that it was a completely different plane called Su-33KUB, the only thing common with the Su-34 being the side-by-side seating arrangement chosen as being more convenient for a carrier trainer then the usual tandem.

    ijozic
    Participant

    To be fair, I said however much. It might not have been a big delay, but the fact was that Lockheed was ahead (e.g. the YF-23 prototypes didn’t even have weapon bays yet, IIRC) and with the possibility of cancellation hanging in the air, getting the design to the production line ASAP was probably a key criteria since the USAF was pretty satisfied with both designs, IIRC.

    ijozic
    Participant

    I don’t think he’s saying that Northrop wouldn’t have made it (I’m sure they would have given time and I think its advantages in RCS signature and longer range would have made the F-23 more potent in the long run). What I think he’s saying is that even though the YF-22 was closer to the end-product, it still (in the context of post-Cold War military budget cuts) only managed to get produced in 187 examples (which was a pretty stupid decision given all the money invested in its development).

    The (however much) longer development of the YF-23 to the production standard F-23 would have brought additional risk of having the whole thing canceled altogether by the time it was ready for production (like e.g. the Comanche).

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2142005
    ijozic
    Participant

    An Su-24 crashed in Syria during take-off from Hmeim airbase so pilots had no time to bail out.

    https://sputniknews.com/middleeast/201710101058089232-russia-su-24-warplane-crew/

    https://syria.liveuamap.com/pics/2017/10/10/21549087_0.jpg

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2142844
    ijozic
    Participant

    An Mi-28N made an emergency landing in Syria apparently.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2144671
    ijozic
    Participant

    Video recorded by guncam of the helo. Looks like it really was an FCS failure – rockets were launched right in that moment when the Master has been turned on.

    Could be a pilot/gunner error also.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2145495
    ijozic
    Participant
    in reply to: Mig 29A in offensive role ? #2145507
    ijozic
    Participant

    The combat radius can be even less according to LW.

    http://www.migflug.com/jetflights/german-luftwaffe-mig-29-fulcrum.html

    But, it’s not like it was purposely built to have such a short range (i.e. to be “defensive” only).

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2145512
    ijozic
    Participant

    If you are talking about a “War Of Aggression”, that does not apply since Israel was the nation that was consistently attacked and not the aggressor.

    OT, but seriously? What happened in 1956? And then in 1967?

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2156116
    ijozic
    Participant

    …. and the staggered mounting – the RH R-77 is mounted further forward to clear the fins – and presumably, has to be fired first?

    They are catapulted downwards, so I’m not sure if a specific firing order is absolutely necessary, but if so, IMHO the order would be the exact opposite – the rear one would be dropped first so that any potential translation backwards during the release doesn’t clip the flight controls of the other missile.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2157945
    ijozic
    Participant

    Overly dramatize? They were just collecting radar intelligence data that they use to program their RWR receivers, standard procedure really. The attack mode could simply refer to the STT mode (lock).

    The question is why would they single out the Su-33 radar. Perhaps it has some modifications to optimize it for over the sea operation which changes its signature somewhat? Or perhaps they were referring to the wartime radar frequency?

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2165319
    ijozic
    Participant

    I’ve only managed to find this blog mentioning the same photo, but the information given is anything but conclusive.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2168743
    ijozic
    Participant

    They seem to have got some variant of SVP-24 upgrade for Su-33 nothing else beyond that but with Engine production again starting they might do some deep upgrade based on 27SM3 variant.

    They also got the Pastel RWR in an earlier upgrade IIRC.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]254527[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread 2. #2007022
    ijozic
    Participant

    Sovershenny shooting down a Termit target with its gun. Nice ROF on the 100mm.

    If so, it doesn’t seem very effective at it. I wonder if they plan to retrofit Pantsir-M on some of these corvettes to replace the AK-630M.

    in reply to: Soviet SAG vs Japanese navy SAG 80s era combat #2007195
    ijozic
    Participant

    Sea Sparrow requires target illumination and IIRC there were usually only two illuminator radars installed per ship, though there’s still Phalanx as some backup.

    I wouldn’t expect these two systems to fare pretty well against a P-500 salvo, but that’s just a guess. The US does test various missile drones intended to simulate various Soviet missiles against test vessels, but the results are obviously classified.

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 533 total)