Either way that is 20,000lbs/9070kg of weapons and fuel. A lot more than some people claim is possible on a STOBAR config (constantly harping on can only launch “lightly loaded”).
Given that it’s internal fuel capacity is 8,500kg and the usual 70% load is around 6,000 kg, the “lightly loaded” part doesn’t seem so far fetched 🙂
At the 28:22 mark there is a Su-34 dropping what it seems to be two dumb bombs in the same time along with three KH-31(x??) missiles.
I was surprised at this to say the least so I ask you guys what you think. It is a very short clip, and it seems that Kh-31 missiles were dropped as if they were dumb bombs.
Perhaps a jettison test (with inert ordnance)?
If those Su-33 got some of the capability of the Su-35S then I don’t see why the RuN needs the MiG-29K. Its a bigger plane with greater range and firepower.
The MiG-29K was already developed and ready for production, while developing a new upgraded Su-33 variant for production would take time and money while at the same time its bigger payload cannot be fully utilized anyway on a carrier without a catapult (like the Kuznetsov class is).
We know they ended up with the Su-33, but the Yak-141 and MiG-29k were rivals.
Rivals? Yak-41 was intended to be a direct replacement for the unsuccessful Yak-38 series, which means Kiev class carriers and as such it was basically a fleet air defense asset only.
Now a Su-33 was lost, because a cable broke… Back in 2005 they lost a Su-33 and nearly lost another because, drumroll; cable broke.
The Aviationist (corrected link) article states that this was a second landing attempt by the pilot. If true, perhaps the pilot broke the cable by landing out of parameters (e.g. too much to the side or something)?
So it would look funny if Turk are bringing their full army force into Syria without any air support 😉
Who said anything about a full army force? But, they do use tanks as support to their rebel groups and they do provide them with some air support.
That is the reason why we do not see Turk jets inside Syria. Assad’s General was out a few weeks ago stating they will fire at any Turkish jets in Syrian Airspace. And with the Russian enclave on the Assad’s side. The Turks are reduced to a semi turkish militia operating inside Syria. what ever heavy equipment Turk use, they are positioned only a few miles inside syrian border, and are not used on the frontlines as of now.
Really? I could have sworn there were occasional reports of Turkish tanks getting hit by IS way past these few miles in Syria, e.g. this month around Al-Bab. Or e.g. the news reports on the offensive on Dabiq mention tanks being used.
P/s: it is not about how evil white helmet or Western media is. I dont care either way how you think about them. But i care about evidence. All arguments and accusations need proper evidence
I admire your patience with these guys.
Do you know perhaps what will happen to the SMT’s from Kursk?
Only the Russian Air Force knows that at the moment. If you translate the article, it presumes that they will get reassigned to some other regiment since they were not used much.
The problem would be to move their forces around on the contryside, from willage to willage. Airsupport will take advantage of these situations. It would wreck havoc to supply and moral for any rebel factions out there.
The air support didn’t stop the rebels from moving and deploying relatively large groups of forces (including some armor and artillery) for both Aleppo counter offensives or the relatively long rebel Hama offensive through the same “open” terrain.
To be fair, the Russian commitment at that point was somewhat waning IIRC due to some political games only to regain momentum once the rebels made significant gains on both fronts. With the Trump administration setting in place though, the regime side seems to be taking full advantage of the current confusion on the external side opposing the regime except for Turkey which decided to get involved directly. Apparently, it seems that just today Erdogan stated again how Turkey had to get involved to bring an end to the oppressive Assad regime. If they do clash with the regime forces north of Aleppo in near future, what will the Russians do?
Supposedly taken today:

When Aleppo falls. The whole region will fall into Government hands. The rebels/terrorist, wont stand a chance when having to fight in open terrain.
It’s not really that simple. Aleppo is not blocking the way to the Idlib province for the regime forces to attempt to retake it. But, the province is full of villages and the terrain is not a flat plain so it’s quite easy to block armored movements with e.g. TOW ambushes which those groups seem to have plenty.
Though obviously, retaking over the whole Aleppo would free the regime their main offensive groups currently allocated there and free additional defensive troops which would allow them to consolidate their position (e.g. expand the corridor to Aleppo), not to mention getting a large morale boost. But, let’s not get too ahead, the rebels basically withdrew from Northeast Aleppo when they were in danger of getting cut off there by a relatively swift regime breakthrough from the east. They might put a stiffer resistance as they run out of places to withdraw to.
Since the rebel groups in Idlib seem to be on the defensive for quite a while now (ever since the failed Aleppo counteroffensive), the more important question is what will happen when regime forces meet Turkish supported rebel units north of Aleppo around Al Bab as the regime forces are also pushing towards it together with YPG forces from the Western Kurdish enclave. One of the main reasons the Turks invaded into Syria supporting Syrian rebel groups of their own against IS is to prevent the Kurdish enclaves to join up.
It was earlier reported (based only on what was visible on the deck) that Kuz carried only 4 x 29K/KUB, but this screen grab shows 5 x MiG-29K/KUB on the decks of Kuz. It remains to be seen how many more MiG-29K/KUB the Kuz might have actually carried during its current deployment.
Certainly not many more as they lack qualified pilots for the type supposedly.
I will help you out with your confused state due to getting exposed to your exclusive “first hand info” on the events. Your backside info (underscored) is covered by your quote (bolded).
The only one with a confused state of mind here is you with this “first hand info” nonsense you invented. Perhaps you can’t read English properly?
On a related note, the regime forces have apparently practically managed to split the east Aleppo in two and are advancing on the smaller northern part from multiple sides.
Wasn’t it already confirmed a few days ago that the MiG-29K just run out of fuel while waiting for the cables to be fixed and it wasn’t a mechanical fault?
Nothing was officially confirmed IIRC, just rumors. For all we know, the low fuel state might have e.g. shown some fault with the fuel management system rather than the jet just stupidly orbiting the carrier until the fuel went out completely.
If Russia has an air base right there, why are they even bothering with the carrier?
Several levels removed from primary source, but why would the commander be punished if a plane had to divert?
They’ve sent the carrier not out of necessity, but for operational testing of the Su-33 A2G upgrades, MiG-29KR’s, Ka-52K’s, etc.
Based on these rumors, perhaps the command might have been held responsible for the arrestor gear failing which rendered the carrier’s primary function inoperable for a while (indicating perhaps improper monitoring or maintenance procedures) or perhaps for the embarrassment of having to send the fighter to Cyprus or some other non-allied country. In any case, risking the plane already in the air for any reason (which seems to have led to the loss of one of the brand new MiG-29KR’s) should be a much bigger problem now unless the plane had no fuel for an emergency divert to some airport anyway and it was just bad luck.