Are dive brakes on gliders the same as spoilers?
I always understood the purpose of spoilers was to destroy lift and not specifically to reduce speed.
Heading for the farm gates..
An hour or so later and safe in our hangar…
Ooops! Looks like the Bedford has sprung a leak!
The wings and horizontal stabiliser, elevator etc were collected earlier.
At last the rain stopped for the last stage of the journey for Proctor ZK-AQK..
A short tow from her shed where she has been for several years and through the lush green pastures of Rangitata!
Careful loading on the transporter..
She wont be going anywhere we dont want her to with all these strops on her..
TonyT, moves have been done in NZ using a trailer and a wooden beam under the wheels.
Thanks TC.
We dont want to tow her backwards as most of the trip would be on State Highway One and if the wheel should go over the edge of the seal (shoulder), which would be very likely, that would put a terrific strain on it in the direction the leg is not stressed for. I have seen a photo of a Proctor with a ‘broken leg’ through doing that and it did not have the engine in but ours has and will be consequently heavier. The distance is about 60km, rough guess, at least three bridges and god knows how many milk tankers along the way! The road for most of the way is just single lane each way.
Is the cabin flat underneath? I am thinking if she is flat underneath of a full sheet of ply with the strops under that. With a rubber mattress on the ply that could sit on the truck deck with the legs hanging down. I really dont want to make it difficult for the guy with the truck.
I would love to see her back in the air but ours is an all volunteer museum with limited resources. We have almost three dozen aircraft now but the very best we can do for them is to assemble and paint them and keep them dry and warm. Maybe some of them will be in the air again one day and we try not to do anything that would complicate someone doing that but in the meantime we just keep them cozy and show them to the public seven days a week. Some of our aircraft were flying until they went into our hangar, Simmonds Spartan is fully airworthy, the DC3 was in the air until a few weeks ago but finally ran out of “papers”, the Tri-Pacer and the Beech Skipper flew here and the Tiger Moth was airworthy when she went into the hangar. Some of the gliders are airworthy. I hope you can visit us one day!
Maybe oneday she will fly again but meanwhile she will be in a cosy hangar looking her best until her Prince Charming comes to call, (not saying we would want to part with her or any of the others though!)
So what do you think, would she be happy sitting on the truck on a rubber mattress with the legs dangling down?
Thanks
John
Proctor ZK-AQK
Hi
ZK-AQK has been bought by the Ashburton Aviation Museum where we will restore her for exhibition.
But first we must move her from Rangitata to Ashburton which will most likely be done by truck and we need to do this soon.
Can anyone please help with advice regarding lifting points? Lifting at the wing attachments using a spreader bar? Sling around the engine mounts? I assume there are ‘official’ lifting points on these aircraft?
Thanks.
He was accompanied by two ships. no mention of other aircraft. 😀
I think the camera man might have been in another aircraft!:)
Thanks for the information. I will know what to do when we decide what to do with this Derwent we have in store.
maybe around 2.5k ? :confused:
I have been trying to send a motorcycle to the UK but with freight and VATetc 4k becomes something over 7k and the sale falls through. I assume it would be the same with an old jet engine.:confused:
We have two Derwents in our museum and I am wondering what I should be recommending for the one that is in storage.:cool:
I wonder what one should expect to pay for a Derwent, non runner, exhibition only.
Yep, . . it is indeed UB 232, confirmed to me today by the previous owner.:)
Thanks very much.:)
Hmmmm…. I was at the museum for a while today and took a glance around looking for identifying marks on our Provost, no luck.
I looked on the engine bulkhead, inside the various fuselage hatches, inside the cockpit.
The are plenty of ‘PAC’ numbers on the wings and empennage as well as the undercarriage parts but these look like that are part specific numbers.
Can someone please tell me if they know where to look on the fuselage?
Thanks.
Probably one of the several that came out of Burma to the US with the three Mk IX Spitfires and the single Seafire XV.
Mark
Cassville Missouri 1999.
It may be, I dont know, this one has been paint stripped but there is enough around the edges to indicate it was once painted green.
John Hill…
You should be able to establish the ID of your Piston Provost from the constructors number, which should should be somewhere on the airframe.
For example, the first Provost T.1 delivered to the RAF was WV418, which has a constructors number of “PAC/56/001”. The last one built (well, for the RAF anyway) was XF614, constructors number “PAC/56/322”
So, if you find anywhere on the airframe “PAC/56/” followed by a three digit number, that is the key to identifying the airframe
Oh, and by the way, there was a correspondent to this forum by the name of Captain Bombay, who flies a Percival Provost T.1, ZK-PPP (formerly WV397). May be worth getting in touch re sourcing of parts. Even if you do not intend to ever fly your Provost, it would still be worth getting in touch, as he may have (or know where to source) the “missing bits” (there’s always bound to be some!)
I have not been personally involved with the Provost and have not taken any real interest in it but as folks here are interested I will make a few enquiries and post what I find.
Thanks for the lead, NZ is not such a big place and I suspect there will be those among our group who are familiar with ZK-PPP but one never knows!:)