The Apache order was one of the few good things the MoD has done in recent years, its just a shame, they have taken so long about it and allowed a private company to screw up the training programme.
The apache gives the army a quantam leap in capability and the ability to deploy massive fire power from HMS ocean. For the sort of wars that Britain tends to be involved today (sierra leone, iraq/afghanistan, etc) the apache is a great machine.
I disagree, the Apache is a nice thing to have but most of it’s missions can be done by other aircraft. HMS Ocean would be better off with Super Lynx 300 armed escorts with cannon and rockets and a flight of Harrier GR9s with Brimstone anti-armour missiles and Paveway IV bombs.
Super Lynx 300 info http://www.agustawestland.com/products01_01.asp?id_product=24
Future Lynx news http://www.agustawestland.com/communication08_01.asp?id_news=170&yy=2005
I think the decision to buy 67 WAH-64 Apaches for the Army Air Corp was a big waste of money too.
I’m sure the money spent on this program could have brought twice as many new build armed Lynx helicopters and a few extra Merlin support helicopters.
thats interesting..scrap to save money only to invest it to get something of the same..the F-35 completes the high – low mix..An f/a-22 fleet would be too expensive…
If the CTOL F-35A had 100% commonality with the F-35B accept for the lift system being replaced by fuel tanks and fixed structure, I’d keep it.
The F-35C has to be quite a lot different to the other two in terms of airframe and will present the high end of the USN JSF/F/A-18 mix. So if the US does develop the F/A-22 into something like the FB-22, I think they should design it to be carrier capable too.
The UK has been spending too much money on too few weapons for decades 🙁
I think 232 Typhoons and 150 F-35B JSFs will be a good combat force for the future. I don’t think we need to change this, as changing it would only waste more money.
Where the UK really wastes it’s money is on surveillance aircraft such as the 7 AWACS, 7 ASTORs, 3 Nimrod R1s and 12 MRA4s. I think larger numbers of less capable aircraft would be better for the UKs needs.
The tanker and transport fleet also need a high/low mix in my opinion.
Interesting proposals, here are some of my ideas.
1) Scrap F-35A and C variants and concentrate on STOVL F-35B for all operators (USAF, USN and USMC).
2) Develop a joint F/A-22 derivative for the USAF and USN.
3) Develop a affordable airframe to replace all the large aircraft such as transports, tankers, and AWACS type planes.
I believe discussions are taking place between the UK and France about building a extra CVF for the French Navy. This would mean that a third of each CVF would be built in French shipyards.
I can still see the CVF getting cancelled soon.
I guess making aircraft easier to fly would mean you could cut pilots wages too 🙂
I stopped. I don’t think halting my life for two minutes to remember those who have had their lives taken away from them is too much to ask. My uncle was murdered a while ago. I think of him every day.
Still, Perhaps I’m just the sort of person who likes to make ’empty’ gestures.
That’s the point though, your Uncle and the dozens of other people murdered in recent weeks didn’t get a silence in their memory.
It seems like the media and politicians are only interested in dramatic murders.
I stopped. I don’t think halting my life for two minutes to remember those who have had their lives taken away from them is too much to ask. My uncle was murdered a while ago. I think of him every day.
Still, Perhaps I’m just the sort of person who likes to make ’empty’ gestures.
That’s the point though, your Uncle and the dozens of other people murdered in recent weeks didn’t get a silence in their memory.
It seems like the media and politicians are only interested in dramatic murders.
No,I only ever stop for the war rememberance, all these others are political gimmicks everbody stood around wondering when the two minutes will be up.
I did stop but I have to agree with Swift. I thought the 2 minute silence for the death of Princess Diana was totally inappropriate too.
The Rememberance Day silence is a show of respect to those who fought for their country. The London bombing silence was a show of sympathy for the victims families who like many other families across the UK have their loved ones murdered everyday. It’s a kind gesture but a empty one in my opinion.
No,I only ever stop for the war rememberance, all these others are political gimmicks everbody stood around wondering when the two minutes will be up.
I did stop but I have to agree with Swift. I thought the 2 minute silence for the death of Princess Diana was totally inappropriate too.
The Rememberance Day silence is a show of respect to those who fought for their country. The London bombing silence was a show of sympathy for the victims families who like many other families across the UK have their loved ones murdered everyday. It’s a kind gesture but a empty one in my opinion.
What concerns me Steve is the fact that with all this technical advancement, you are going to loose out of some very handy combat manouvering e.g. During the Falklands conflict, many harriers were abble to throw the nozzel position selector down and basically zap up and over an enemy on their tail, all while still looking forward.
This new stuff and the new F-35’s won’t be able to do this, IMHO, because their systems won’t allow it either through computer programing errors or due to structural designs.
One must ask oneself if these new systems are worth loosing some combat edge over any potential enemy!
I guess VIFFing manoeuvres could be retained on a VAAC equiped Harrier, but I don’t think the F-35B STOVL system is at all suitable for VIFFing.
If a F-35B attempted to deploy it’s lift system at high speed a great deal of damage would occur to the various doors and hatches and the surrounding airframe. The F-35B will have superior conventional agility to the Harrier anyway.
These systems remind me of the joke in which future aircraft are crewed by a man and a dog, the man’s job is to feed the dog and the dog’s job is to bite the man if he tries to touch the controls 🙂
I think these systems are a good thing, most modern aircraft are only kept in the air by flight control computers so it makes sense to make the pilots job as easy as possible to avoid crashes caused by simple errors.
I think this technology could be applied to ‘fly by wire’ helicopters too.
If VAAC controls were fitted to the AV-8B Harrier’s maybe the 2 seat trainer Harrier’s could be retired to save money.
After all, the STOVL JSF will not have a 2 seat trainer variant, so why not spend the all the money on the frontline Harrier’s.
Harrier GR9 pic.
I’d like to see a attack helicopter version of the Sikorsky X2 armed with cannon, JCM missiles and APKWS rockets.
http://www.sikorsky.com/details/0,3036,CLI1_DIV69_ETI2088,00.html
The X2 demonstrator will feature a coaxial design (two rotors on the same axis) and a ‘pusher prop’ to supply auxiliary propulsion that will enable the aircraft to reach high speeds of 250 knots.