This is a good site for those interested in STOVL
International V/STOL Historical Society http://www.vstol.org/
Sc Fi movies seem to have taken inspiration from it!!;):eek:
The inspiration for the Gunstar from The Last Starfighter?
Interesting project from 1967
The Convair Model 49
http://www.russian.ee/~star/vertigo/convair-49-r.html
WOW!!!!
Hey You took me offf my feet by posting those superb Photo Yes U were Correct … i was looking for X-22..!!:) Thanks SOC…. X-22 might see revival in form of Skycar
Hey one More request can u Post & Name another Jet Powered US VSTOL project… which used the most queer vertical lift principal… I dont remember exact details I saw it on Discovery… It used a conventional Jet Engine,…. But for lift purposes it used to Open Vents on Spine of aircraft…. and used the power of airsucked into those vents
to lift aircraft Up…Heck:mad: I cant explain correctly
Is this what your after?
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/xv-4.htm
XV-4A Hummingbird
GarryB/seahawk
Armoured cockpits, ejection seats and F1 type safety cells are OK for attack helicopters when you only have protect 2 crew, but are totally impractical on transport helicopters carrying dozens of troops.
The most sensible solution is a better seat design. It does not matter if you wreck the helicopter in the crash, it matters that the crew survives. So you woant adsopring structure, airbags and special seats that deform to keep the nergy away from the passenger.
Seat design is important but can only absorb the crash energy in the vertical axis, so if the helicopter doesn’t crash on the level the seat won’t do much good. Also without airbags the airframe has to absorb all the crash energy which will probably result in the crew getting crushed or trapped as happens in car accidents.
See the airbag pics here
http://www.rafael.co.il/web/rafnew/products/brochures/REAPS.pdf
Crashworthy seat info here
http://www.martin-baker.co.uk/crashw_Intro.htm
What about a rocket dampening system as used by the Soviets to air-drop armour? The pilot could activate it if the chopper gets into trouble and combined with even partially sucessful auto-rotation it could slow the fall enough to save lives. Again it depends on the crew being alive enough to activate it but better than nothing surely. Or maybe you could just stick a great big parachute onto the chopper…
Nice idea, better than a parachute at low level. I guess weight and locating the system on the airframe might be a problem though.
Airbags and explosive bolts on rotor blades add cost, complication and weight to an aircraft or reduce strength.
THe real problem would be what is to trigger the airbags… nothing worse than flying Nap of earth at 200km/h and having your rotors blown off by your own system because you got to close to the ground… firing them on impact is too late…
The same can be said about ejection seats on military aircraft, but the added cost, complication and weight have saved thousands of lives.
I think helicopter crew deserve similar survival gear, don’t you?
As for triggering the system, I think the same sort of arrangement as a ejection seat would do fine in most cases.
Low level, terrain masking flying to avoid radar detection?
Toss bombing, to get stand-off ranges to avoid air defences?
This topic has been discussed on a previous thread see here-
http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=30155
GarryB
Successfully landing a helicopter by autorotation is dependant on having enough height and speed to to spin up the rotor so it has enough energy to reduce the rate of descent just before touch down.
Autorotation also relies on the pilots not being injured or dead and the rotor and controls being in working order.
I think a airbag system is the best solution.
The sad news about the RN Lynx crash reminded me of this thread, lets hope more can be done to improve survivability soon.
Have found this info on the Israeli system
http://www.rafael.co.il/web/rafnew/products/air-reaps.htm
Brochure
http://www.rafael.co.il/web/rafnew/products/brochures/REAPS.pdf
LOSAT info here
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ground/losat.htm
Quote-Lockheed Martin, the leader in designing, integrating and producing anti-armor systems, will field LOSAT “pre-production” units to the Army’s 82nd Airborne Division beginning in 2003 for testing.
Motor Books in Oxford is OK, but they seem to have more books on trains and cars than aviation.
Not much is known about the english stealth prototype, the Replica. Every further information is welcome!
New Scientist article here
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99993590
I also heard that the Replica program was used as leverage to get a better place on the JSF program.