dark light

SteveO

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,396 through 1,410 (of 1,444 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Helicopters: General News #2651311
    SteveO
    Participant

    I heard they might abandon the AH-1Z/UH-1Y remanufacturing program and go for new build airframes instead.

    in reply to: BLACK BUCK ALTERNATIVE #1807812
    SteveO
    Participant

    David Burke

    I wonder, if the Sea Harriers avionics and weapons fit had been equal to the Phantoms, would he have said that?

    in reply to: Government Cancellations..What Could Have Been? #1807856
    SteveO
    Participant

    How about the ‘tin wing’ Harrier GR5.

    This project was dropped when the UK joined the AV8B program. It involved rewinging GR3’s with a metal wing with more area and hardpoints. I think it would also have made a great part of the Sea Harrier FRS2 upgrade.

    in reply to: BLACK BUCK ALTERNATIVE #1807921
    SteveO
    Participant

    adrian gray

    I think the Black Buck missions were a very impressive achievement and political statement, but militarily extravagant and unesscessary. Can’t deny it helped with reducing the air threat though.

    As for torpedos, on a recent TV documentry he said that he used the 40’s torpedo because he hadn’t heard a Tigerfish go BANG yet!

    in reply to: Invincible for the IN #2074891
    SteveO
    Participant

    Sameer

    Buy how many!!….15020!!
    Think you meant 15 or 20, or the British government has got some explaining to do.

    in reply to: AIM-7 Sparrow & RIM-7 Sea Sparrow #2059687
    SteveO
    Participant

    Are ESSM remanufactured Sea Sparrows or are they new build?

    in reply to: BLACK BUCK ALTERNATIVE #1807990
    SteveO
    Participant

    Firebird

    I think Ward said that the weather conditions would have severely limited conventional carrier operations. I would imagine this would be due to low visibility and a pitching flight deck.
    Also the Sea Harrier didn’t have to keep reserve fuel for landing in case of missing the arrestor wires, so it could stay in the fight longer.

    in reply to: Some thing different for the jet boys.TSR2 #1808012
    SteveO
    Participant

    Fantastic looking plane, ugly undercarriage!

    in reply to: BLACK BUCK ALTERNATIVE #1808483
    SteveO
    Participant

    OK, so the Victor tanker conversion was a permanant role change I take it?

    What do you think of ‘Sharkey’ Ward’s comment that Port Stanley airport could have just as effectively been closed to the Argentines by toss bombing it with a single 1000lb bomb from each Sea Harrier at the start of their CAP.

    in reply to: BLACK BUCK ALTERNATIVE #1808540
    SteveO
    Participant

    Incidentally is it “nick piccies from Damien’s website” week? :D[/QUOTE]

    Apologies to Damien, Great website!
    http://www.thunder-and-lightnings.co.uk/contents.html

    in reply to: BLACK BUCK ALTERNATIVE #1809077
    SteveO
    Participant

    How big a job would it have been to get them back to bombers?

    SteveO
    Participant

    I think I heard the SRA/1 had the best performance of any jet when it first flew.

    SteveO
    Participant

    One of a kind?
    What about Convair’s delta wing Sea Dart.

    in reply to: AIM-7 Sparrow & RIM-7 Sea Sparrow #2059772
    SteveO
    Participant

    Evolved Sea Sparrow can quadruple the missile loadout of a ship, each vertical launch cell can fit 4 ESSM.

    in reply to: MULTI-ROLE METEOR #2059785
    SteveO
    Participant

    JonS

    I was suggesting that a IR seeker could be combined with the active radar seeker of a Meteor like missile.
    Anyway, if a defending ship turned off its radar to defeat a Armiger it would have to rely on decoys, EW and passive guided weapons to defeat other types of threat further reducing its survival chances.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,396 through 1,410 (of 1,444 total)