dark light

wilhelm

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 1,634 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2170895
    wilhelm
    Participant

    In the same place where yours, ‘dad'(actually, my dad, as well as my mom, worked in ЦИАМ and was much smarter than you, my little painter). The only difference between us is that i haven’t lost my mind and don’t mix up my love to Homeland with your blind love to any decision of any current Master/Tsar/Gensek/Garant. And BTW, word Homeland should be written with capital H. Just like Rodina.

    But why didn’t you answer to my simple questions?

    To our non-Russian members. Now you see? This is how mentality of the most of our people still works: If you’re disagree with political decisions of our current Master then Russia isn’t your Homeland.

    Poor idiots – they never learn.

    Now we see what?
    Scar, Paralay has over the years contributed a hell of a lot to this forum, and to a wide variety of aerospace forums across the internet.
    You are a poster called Scar, a recently joined member with no track record, who likes to pick fights.

    There really is no comparison.

    Anyway, it is nearly midnight at the western edge of Europe, so perhaps it is time for bed, for me at least…;)

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2170919
    wilhelm
    Participant

    A long list of aircraft shot down for alleged violations of Russian airspace makes depressing reading. I’m glad that my country and its air force does not have that sort of record.

    Maybe start a thread then concerning the saintliness of the RAF as you percieve it, and leave this thread free from personal moralising?
    It is after all, the Russian Airforce News and Development thread, not the I Have a Problem with Everything Russian thread.

    EDIT: I see you have copped on in a follow on post. Fair play.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2170923
    wilhelm
    Participant

    Funny? A lot of murders by Soviet fighter pilots in that list. Look at where these incidents took place – international airspace over the Baltic. Why do you find it funny?

    Will you be polluting this thread and forum like you do others from now on?

    I did warn the forum about Swerve.
    Like I said, on another forum, there is years and years of anti Russian bile, to the point that many posters left.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2171296
    wilhelm
    Participant

    The recent actions in the Baltic by the Su-27 barrel rolling over the RC-135

    Once again, the US accused Russia of doing it, Russia said it didn’t happen.
    You now stating it as if it is a fact that happened, or wanting to believe it happened, doesn’t mean it did happen.

    in reply to: New Ukrainian light fighter #2171526
    wilhelm
    Participant

    Yeah, his analysis boils down to some desperate need to portray Russian relations to China as “junior” in status- no doubt a reflection of inner biases. Apparently no influence is to be had from being the only UNSC member who is somewhat on China’s side in the whole island debate.

    Russia depends far more on the EU overall for economic viability, and yet has strongly gone against EU preference and pressure in the obvious case. And yet it is at China’s mercy and no influence whatsoever? lol.

    In fairness, it is rather mild stuff from him compared to what I’ve seen before, unfortunately.

    in reply to: New Ukrainian light fighter #2171555
    wilhelm
    Participant

    This is libellous. I hate no country, & no ethnicity. My meetings with Russians, & my experience of visiting Russia, have been overwhelmingly positive. I love Russian literature (you should see my bookshelves), music (my favourite composer is Russian), art, vernacular architecture – shall I go on?

    You’re making things up to try to justify your personal dislike of me. You seem to assume that criticism of policies, behaviours, & a government can only be explained by hatred of everything to do with a country.

    BTW, I have never avoided commenting on Russian threads here, studiously or otherwise. I comment when I see something I wish to comment on.

    Unfortunately, hundreds of posts from you on the other site reveal a very different story that you try to portray above, as do your other posts in this thread, with their rather unsubtle little digs. I have no interest or need to make things up…your own posts over there damn you. They still exist on the internet, you know.:rolleyes:
    I have a personal dislike for you because of your posting behaviour concerning Russia and Russians there, over a couple of years. A few other posters used to call you on your behaviour too. Pretending to get offended and using silly words doesn’t fly with me, unfortunately.

    You seem to assume that criticism of policies, behaviours, & a government can only be explained by hatred of everything to do with a country.

    :rolleyes:

    I have no interest at all in engaging with you knowing what I know of your other posts, having had unfortunately to read through them and your attacks.
    At least others have been given a heads up of your behaviour elsewhere, and which was starting to mildly become apparent in your posts above. I have seen it before from you, and it gets much worse.
    That is my last statement on the matter in this thread.

    in reply to: New Ukrainian light fighter #2171587
    wilhelm
    Participant

    Uhm…yes. That is what Sepheronx said. GDP by PPP….

    Sepheronx, Byoin previously stated that the Tejas had a “much higher” wingloading than the F-20 Tigershark.
    After that, I would take anything he says with truck loads of salt.

    On the subject at hand, I see on another forum that this picture was actually shown in 2015 already, so is not a new 2016 design at least. Someone posted on that forum that the design itself dates back to 2006, when it was possibly offered to Ukraines MOD.
    I was also wondering what design bureau in Ukraine would be responsible. I cannot recall any actual combat aircraft design bureau’s there beyond Antonov and various jet engine bureau’s, but not any bureau that specialises in fighters.

    It has been stated that the picture was shown during a visit to Zaporozhye Machine-Building Design Bureau Progress State Enterprise. This is an engine design house, not an aircraft or jet fighter design bureau.

    With all of the above, and taking into consideration that Ukraines economy is completely down the toilet, one get’s the distinct impression that this is a paper plane that has almost zero chance of seeing the light of day.

    I stand to be corrected however….the above is simply my opinion based on what facts I could find.

    in reply to: New Ukrainian light fighter #2171646
    wilhelm
    Participant

    To add: it will only derail the thread from a potential Ukrainian Light Fighter, to how bad or weak Russia is, who doesn’t have any friends. I see that kind of stuff has already started in his last post, even after it was edited. I wonder what “gems” were in the original…

    in reply to: New Ukrainian light fighter #2171648
    wilhelm
    Participant

    TR1 and Hmsphere.

    Swerve has been trying hard to keep a “clean” profile on this forum. It’s why he studiously avoids commenting on Russian threads here.
    Unfortunately, he gives vent to his true hatred on other forums regarding Russia and Russians. He has a long history of it over at Tanknet, where he doesn’t hide at all what he really thinks. He is notorious for it. That includes attacking and trying to run Russian posters off the that forum. It is because of campaigns that denigrates and demonize like his that sites like that are now less informative with dwindling amounts of posters. I know i don’t bother there anymore, only one of many….
    As such, engaging with somebody who has revealed such hardened, entrenched, sustained dislike (to put it politely) for Russia, its people, and culture, is a waste of your time.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2172207
    wilhelm
    Participant

    What are you whittering on about Wilhelm, you sound like a man obsessed?

    It is extremely annoying that your automatic default position anytime you interject in a Russian thread is “The Russians must be in the wrong”.
    As such, you are the man obsessed.
    It’s been your modus operandi since you’ve been here. And once again your posts concerning the intercept were exactly as they always are, with the inclusion of the including the Su-24 flyby over the US vessel as supporting “evidence” of your constant “Russia is in the wrong” message.
    You may think it is subtle, but let me assure you it isn’t. It’s a stuck record.
    There is a search function above that people can freely use and which illustrates exactly what I’m talking about.

    You or anybody else here has no idea what transpired in reality, but you defaulted to your automatic position without any evidence. As usual.
    The US made an accusation, the Kremlin said they were wrong. A balanced person would await further info….

    It seems the Russian Federation is ignoring the agreement on procedures agreed

    There is obviously some sort of Kremlin policy been enacted here.

    But anyway, don’t let me stop you from continuing your 10 year old campaign.:applause:

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2172313
    wilhelm
    Participant

    Aaaand followed up a by a rapid flurry of anti-Russian posts by Levsha.
    How utterly, utterly predictable.
    Maybe it’s time to create an anti-Russian thread of your own, where you and others of similar ilk can demonise and spread the hate to your hearts content, and not clog up this thread with your deep-seated issues?
    Why post on the Russian Airforce thread if all you do is hate? It’s extremely tedious for the rest of us who don’t suffer such personal issues.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2172317
    wilhelm
    Participant

    And I guess there is no evidence that the USN ship Donald Cook got buzzed by Su-24s 2 weeks back? There is obviously some sort of Kremlin policy been enacted here.

    Hey, it’s “Moscow Times” Levsha.
    Has there ever been an incidence on the forum, ever, when you haven’t defaulted automatically to “The Russians are wrong” mode?
    Certainly not to my recollection in the 10 years since you joined. That takes some doing.
    Any story behind what made you so lop sided? An incident when there?

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2173793
    wilhelm
    Participant

    True, but then read back, I don’t think it is out of line to call out obvious lies, and I was not the person who went OT. But, you are correct this is not the proper thread, my apologies.

    No worries. I don’t disagree with some of your points, but in another thread perhaps.

    On topic, is there any indication of when construction of the Il-106 is likely to be started? I know they are still refining an updated design, but I was reading that it was just announced that no more An-124’s are to be constructed. The plant will only deal in overhauls.
    I would imagine this is sufficient for a few years, but will this mean the Il-106 will probably need to be placed on a path where it comes to fruition a bit sooner perhaps?

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2173799
    wilhelm
    Participant

    Anger and no logic, sad. That rant had nothing to do with the topic a hand.

    Still waiting for documentation of your claims….. But you have none because they are made up nonsense. Cue the next diatribe about the evil west.

    Russiadefense.net is missing their court jester. Run along now to peddle your crap to an audience that doesn’t know better

    And yet, not one of your posts so far have anything to do with the topic at hand either. Thus, it is simply a sad, off topic rant too.

    Please compose another thread where various personal inadequacies can be vented, as none of this has anything to do with this topic.

    wilhelm
    Participant

    the Tejas is inferior to the F-20. it is heavier, worse thrust to weight ratio, higher wing loading,

    Er…what?
    Did you really just try and say the Tejas has a higher wing loading than the F-20?
    Have you actually seen the two aircraft?

    The F-20 has a wing area only half that of the Tejas. And this reflects in the fact that the F20 has a wing loading much, much higher than the Tejas.

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 1,634 total)