You bring up some good points, but I imagine the advent of personal cameras and camera phones makes this a fruitless and expensive proposition not justified by current world politics.
The cold war is no longer. Moving a base and existing manufacturer may cost many millions, and yet be destroyed by a tourist or local, “lost” or not, with a $20 camera phone.
Six of one, half a dozen of another….
I know they have big population, but can’t the chinese military have a base with big enough cleared perimeter to avoid “amateur spying” with photocameras? It should be easier than trying to smudge all images that leak in the internet.
Not too sure.
But certainly, their population density, and probably skillset in urban areas, largely dictates these things. Why create a seperate city in the middle of nowhere just for this? This would be a needless expense not seen since the ColdWar, which is no longer there.
What i find weird with all this “censorship”-smudge thing, is how come the Chinese airforce doesn’t have some isolated airforce base, to test her own prototypes/secret projects. It seems that approaching the fence and getting pictures isn’t that hard. With the huge geographical extension of China, one would think that they could find a better way to hide something from indiscreet eyes, rather than chasing photos over the internet. :confused:
Of course you find it weird. You’re from a small country.
Does over 1.3 billion mean anything to you?
Sorry, with the Advent of the F-22, F-35, PAK-FA, and J-XX. The Mig-29K is in fact obsolete or at very least will be in the next decade.:eek:
First of all, as has been mentioned, it is Kuznetsov.
Second, your post quoted above is rubbish.
And I fail to see what your point is above?
F22 is a land based fighter.
The F-35 is not even operational.
Neither is the PAK-FA.
The J-XX doesn’t even exist yet, at least not in the public domain.
The Mig-29K would make a pretty potent carrier aircraft, and will remain viable for years to come. Surely you should be comparing apples with apples and use the Rafale M or F-18 as the only correct current comparisons?
I realise that this thread is part of your overall thread/post trend agenda, and that it will inevitably, as always, come down to why they just don’t buy an American product, and particularly the F-35.
Correct?;)::diablo:
Be interesting to see what the Ecuadorean pilots think of the Cheetah C compared to the Kfir C10 or CE.
There are several differences between the two types, notably in powerplant and the Cheetah C’s longer forward fuselage.
There is some interest from South Africa it seems.
As they were originally looking at the A400M, they would need something that transports bigger, heavier loads than a C-130. Something approaching a 30 ton payload would certainly tweak serious South African interest, I think. Otherwise, it’s probably back to the A400M…
F-35 $92 Million per plane? JSF procurement “is not happening at that price”
The Pentagon is demanding lower prices for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, pressuring Lockheed Martin and engine supplier Pratt & Whitney to go below their most aggressive cost targets.
Procurement chief Ashton Carter says he does not expect to pay the projected $92-million average unit cost (in 2002 dollars). JSF procurement “is not happening at that price,” and the Defense Department cannot afford the cost to go higher, *Carter told the Credit Suisse/Aviation Week 2010 Aerospace and Defense Conference in New York last week.
=TR1;1670063]
So far it has been only paper project. Apparently they have recently decided that if it is constructed ever……
I was under the impression that the keel has already been laid?
Look here:
http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,11458.0.html
Rumcajs, that Letov L-52 appears to have it’s wings lifted straight from the Messerschmitt 262?
=Scooter;1668995]The web is full of sources about the Indian Navy looking for a New Fighter beyond the current Mig-29K. So, it’s not like I made it up!
The web is full of lot’s of things Scooter!;)
Anything official though?
India has just made a commitment to buy a naval fighter roughly in the SH class. (I’m placing the Mig29K, SH, and Rafale M in the same category, for they are competitors.)
I can only see them complementing these Mig-29K’s with the naval LCA due to it being an indigineous aircraft, which is sensible for their industry.
Why would they then look for a third fighter???:confused:
Tango III has just posted on the News thread:
http://en.rian.ru/mlitary_news/20101122/161440526.html
40 flights in the first 10 months – around 1 test per week, is that not just a little bit slow?
The F-35 was only able to complete 100 flights in the first 2.5 years which was seen as a bit of a disaster (somebody got sacked), the F-22 completed 500 hours in the same time period.
How many flights and flying hours is planned for the PAK FA development programme?
I’m sure that when the second prototype joins the programme in the next few weeks, things will pick up.
It’s probably not correct to compare the 2.5 year figure of the F-35 with the single T-50 flying over 10 months.
Swerve, I agree with almost 100% of what you have posted here over the years. But what Trident posted as follows:
However, unlike France and the UK, the Russian economy still has a lot of headroom for growth. I can’t see the former two growing at say 7% – 3, maybe even 4% at the best of times, but definitely no more.
certainly deserves consideration. Whilst at present what you say is accurate, what Russia has experienced is also a natural condition of the fall of an empire, much like the painful contraction experienced by Britain in the 60’s and 70’s after the collapse of her Empire .
Russia is the largest landmass in the world. There are unexploited natural resources that dictate that, when they sort out their contraction teething problems and if they manage to hold on to their nuclear “stick” that guarantees the total destruction of any current opponent (and indeed civilisation), they will once again become a global power they were destined to always be. This would obviously entail population, economic, and political change, amongst others, but these are recognised parameters that have been mentioned in the popular press and so must be assumed to be political priorities.
Simple economics and politics, really.:D;)
The missile itself is an IR or Radar missile. The acquisition and launch of the missile is all radar based, no IRST IIRC.
I’m not too sure of the Umkhonto missile at present. When it was originally unveiled as the SAHV-3, it formed part of an air-defence system mounted on the Rooikat 8X8 chassis. The other “sharp-end” component was the twin 35mm also on the Rooikat chassis. Amongst other acquisition and control features, this had a stabilised electro-optical sight. There was a component on this that had an infra red tracker/camera or ELIR that enabled targets to be “acquired and tracked under total darkness”.
How much search capability this entailed I’m unsure of, as was the upper-end command/search methods available apart from the stated radars of this project. South Africa did have an advanced electro optical and infra red industry, headed by Eloptro(?) IIRC?
ppp;1665099]
So we have upgraded some MR2 to MR4 then scrapped it halfway through, so now we should import a different MPA and begin a new upgrade programme for those instead?Was that your actual suggestion :confused:
I am as much an admirer of the Nimrod as anyone. In it’s day, under various guises, it was probably THE maritime patrol/ASW aircraft.
But that performance, particularly it’s aerodynamic performance, came at a cost. There is an argument that that level of performance spec is not needed since the demise of the Soviet Union, and that a more fuel efficient, economical turboprop will be more suitable to todays budgets. Also, when was the last airframe made? How long, and at what cost, will parts still be available/manufactured for such a small amount of specialised beasts?
I think the decision has been made, (rightly or wrongly, I am not in a position of importance to judge) so the focus should be on rapidly getting a decent replacement procured IMHO.
Whether the Atlantique fits the bill, and new airframes could still be produced should certainly be looked at IMHO.
I would have thought a better solution would be some ex US P3 Orions.
Plenty of other European operators Germany, Portugal, Spain, Greece and Norway and the same engines as the C130Ks.
Doesn’t the Atlantic/Atlantique 2 use British engines in any event? Add some local avionics and equipment and you’re halfway there…..