Diving conditions in the Firth of Forth are treacherous – strong currents and abysmal visibility. There are tons of interesting “prospects” down there from medieval times onwards.
Last Thursday evening I was taxiing in an Aztec and right out of nowhere the unlimited air racing Sea Fury “Miss Merced” shot across the field at an estimated 50 feet and 400mph. That was pretty unexpected, and pretty exciting!
East Fortune used to clash with Yeovilton, they changed and clash with Duxford… it’s actually pretty hard to find a plum midsummer weekend when there isn’t some kind of major air show on. And that’s before you start trying to avoid major sporting events like the Open Golf.
The Wright Brothers had two props geared to the same drive shaft, roatating in opposite directions to produce a zero torque effect.
Well my vote goes to the Wright Brothers, because their 1903 Flyer had contra-rotating props.
On the theme of this thread, the website for EAA’s video oral history effort “Timeless Voices of Aviation” can be found here: http://www.timelessvoices.org
There are some interresting downloads there.
MSIM
I was quite impressed when I first went to Manchester – maybe ’95. The collection is a good reflection of Manchester’s contribution to aviation.
However last time I went (02) I was quite struck by how far downhill it seemed to have gone in such a short space of time – the place had an air of neglect about it that wasn’t there the first time I went.
RE: Free entry to air museums.
From the Department of Culture, Media & Sport website:
“Access is the keystone of the Government’s policy on the arts. With funding from the Department for Culture, Media and Sport, the national museums and galleries in England which it supports now offer free entry to their permanent collections to all visitors.
Free admission for children has been in place from 1 April 1999, and for those aged 60 and over from 1 April 2000. The removal of entry charges for all adults from 1 December 2001 will mean that people of all ages and backgrounds will be able to visit our most important permanent collections and see them free of charge.
Not only will this represent a considerable financial saving for the average family, it will also open up our national museums to a potentially far greater number of visitors.”
(That is pretty clear, and is laudable.)
This link http://www.culture.gov.uk/PDF/museum_charges.pdf takes you to a list of which DCMS sponsored museums currently charge and which do not.
(Some of this is clearly at odds with the statement above. The point I am making is that neither goverment nor museum management seems to be doing anything about it.)
RE: Free entry to air museums.
Scott
This is quite a complex one so bear with me…
It was a manifesto pledge of the Labour Party to remove admission charges at UK National Museums – that is, those museums funded by national government. It took them a little time to get going, but, by and large, the government have delivered on that promise – charges have been removed at most of the big national museums. These include the National History Museum, the Science Museum, the Victoria and Albert Museum, the Imperial War Museum (Lambeth), the National Maritime Museum, the Royal Armouries in Leeds, the Museum of Science and Industry in Manchester, the National Museums and Galleries on Merseyside, the National Railway Museum in York, the NMS Royal Museum of Scotland and the NMS Museum of Scotland.
The government provided extra funding to the Museums to make up for lost visitor revenues. As expected, visitor figures have rocketed across this part of the Museum sector. Wonderful!
So far, so good – Government delivers on promise; Museums happy; punters happy.
So you may ask (and, Scott, I think you are asking) why does it still cost me to get into IWM Duxford and the NMS Museum of Flight? Are these not government funded museums like those listed above? Has our government not made a pledge to allow free admission to such museums?
It looks like someone is being duped somewhere. Either the Government is failing to deliver on its manifesto pledge, or the museums concerned have pocketed the extra funding and are continuing to charge. It is clear that neither party is doing much about this issue, and this leads me to think that maybe both parties are happy for things to breeze along as they currently are. Certainly the government has “fixed” the big high profile museums, but is happy to turn a blind eye to fixing the smaller and less controversial ones. The government will definitely not fork out extra money if it thinks it can avoid so doing. And I do sometimes wonder if the museum administrations themselves are not overly concerned to mention the inconsistency because they can make a few extra bob charging at their outstations.
So could it be that the tax-paying public is being duped? You have a government that has very clearly promised to remove admission charges at IWM Duxford, and has very clearly promised to remove admission charges at NMS Museum of Flight. But you are still paying to get in these places (and there are others, this is not JUST aviation museums).
By the way, the RAF Museum is a slightly different situation as they are funded through military budgets. It is to the lasting credit of all involved at the RAFM that the extra money was found to remove charges in line with government policy. Let’s hope the Fleet Air Arm Museum can do the same some day.
RE: New Curator at East Fortune
Well at least I got those cases filled in the end…
…and it probably took more than a couple of hours to do it… man, if you did something like put the WRONG SERIAL NUMBER on one of the captions, heck, those website forum guys would be all over you!!! 🙂