dark light

Marcellogo

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 811 through 825 (of 1,560 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2191620
    Marcellogo
    Participant

    This whole thing started with the government sniping at its own people!

    They keep them in the city and then they and the Russians can say “oh well, we tried. You can’t say we didn’t try…” They will then increase the bombardment under the pretext that they gave anyone truly innocent the chance to escape.

    PLEASE, instead of saying such absurdities , gave just a look on twitter, it’s full of footage of hell’s cannons targeting with no advice the green buses assembly point.
    And if you doesn’t know what are such buses, it means you know absolutely nothing about the reality of Syria war.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2191655
    Marcellogo
    Participant

    UK MOD information on shadowing the very attractive carrier group past Blighty:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-37719847

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]249138[/ATTACH]
    I assume it’s not always so smoky?

    Always seeing it quite smoky.
    Russians use Mazut, an heavy type of furnace oil for their Steam engines as they do with their distintive district heating implants.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXV #2192876
    Marcellogo
    Participant

    Pak-fa is very important for the Russian industry because it allowed them to physically create features of a fifth generation fighter and experience its reality, benefits and limitations. There is much to learn from such an experience.

    But we need to face realities too. its gdp is only slightly higher than Australia and growth is in the negatives, meaning it’ll become like Australia and maybe to Spain. It cannot afford the program. It may end up being like India and Tejas. It is a good experience and new knowledge gained. They need to save money now and get the su-35, and then use the knowledge of pak-fa to develop a full 5th generation fighter in the future when the economy is better. China is doing all it can to save the Russian economy. The J-31 is also an option for Russia to consider.

    You still don’t get how the Russian (former Sov) procurement system work, is it not?
    They don’t made overall contracts for a set number of planes through the years like the (frankly absurd) one of F-35, shackling themselves for almost two decades on a plane that can turn out to be obsolete in less than ten. They instead make order for a batch at time, ready to modify an assembly line as soon as a new product is ready and one of such contracted order is complete.
    And they have different fighter planes in production/overhaul at the same time, actually.
    Su-30SM, Su-35, Su-34 , Yak-130, so a production batch is usually about to be completed at any time…
    So this years they have signed a contract for a first batch of 12 Pak-Fa to be done next year for OCU squadron even before state trials are complete and the last prototype is even finished. Having completed production of Su-30Mk2 they have just the required space cleared and ready to be used.

    in reply to: Chinese air power thread 18 #2194249
    Marcellogo
    Participant

    In my view, the J-20 appears to be far more agile in the air than its design would otherwise suggest, at least based on the videos so far available, and especially considering the fact that it lacks TVC.

    Although a little smaller they are still delta wings + canard+ Lerx, so I would expect a maneouvreability at least comparable to a JF-17 if not even a J-10, and not like the Mig-31, even without TVC.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2196006
    Marcellogo
    Participant

    It seems Egypt will be procuring Ka-52Ks as well. “The customer is considering several helicopter squadrons” – Punchuk.

    http://vpk-news.ru/news/33059

    I think is just another reason of Kutnetsov cruise, isn’t it? It can also be that in the end we would see russian Ka-52K operating from the very same Mistrals hollande has refused to Russia.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2197604
    Marcellogo
    Participant

    When? The Marines were accused of using willy pete in the second battle of Fallujah and it was all over the news as a violation of combat rules. How many WP attacks have happened in Syria via Russia and SAA? You make the mistake of thinking that I support US actions unequivocally. The minute the argument starts with “Well the U.S”, your on a slippery moral slope. I am against undue murder of civilians in war, period. It happens, it is terrible. The extent that it can be avoided the better.
    (BTW, since the CCM, the US has used submunitions or cluster bombs in practice, CBU-87 and the like, and has defended the use of them against wide area targets not in urban areas for whatever that is worth. Napalm is not used, and the use of unguided munitions is less than 30% in recent campaigns)
    That is not the case with the campaign in Syria. You can sit happily on your supposed moral high ground claiming that the Russian campaign is targeting terrorists (odd considering your not Russian, I would expect a person of a nationality to defend their nation. That is natural, your allegiance is even more troubling). There is no moral high ground- Aleppo/Grozny= indiscriminate annihilation from the air. You can sit back and spout your “Well, the US killed 60 SAA fighters (as if there is an SAA left instead of a collection of Shiite terrorists, and Alawite warlords), so what Russia is doing is OK. Sorry, the rest of the thinking world is not buying it.

    FBW, I have there avoided to enter into political babbling until now still what you say is a proof of how much you are both grossly ignorant and disinformed about Syria conflict.
    Only Shiite terrorist and Alawite warlord? Actually the great majority of loyalist forces, in both SAA than NDF (the one that have saved the regime and no one seems even to know existence) are Sunnis and almost totally Sunni are the SyAAF pilots that western governments want to ground up.
    Actually the commander of Deir el Zour garrison is the legendary Issam Zahereddine (no exageration there , when you typing his name on search box it automatically suggest it like so) a Druze, that like all of them together with all Armenians, Assyrian, Chaldeans christians, Ismailis, Alawite, Sufi muslim and all other religious and etnic minorities sides 100% with the government or with the Kurds while the opposition is made in its own totality by Sunnis and in an overhelming part by fundamentalist ones.
    Russia, with all its ruthlessness and brutality, stand up with all those minorities, western governments arms, protect and make propaganda for intolerant and fanatics, that still keep on sending their own to kill our people.
    So, what **** of moral high ground (a risible concept in itself, that we have get rid from Machiavelli times onward) are you babbling about?

    For the military part of your post, also it full of “debatable things”…another time.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2198767
    Marcellogo
    Participant

    Qatar, UAE, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait – they are primarily interested in Sunnis overrunning Syria so that they get rid of Assad who is ally of Shiite Iran.
    Turkey – less clear but I guess that whatever party that is willing to slash Kurds is good for them..
    Israel – whoever occupies attention of Assad and Hezbollah, is helping Israel to become a less likely target
    USA – their motives to get rid of Assad are not entirely clear to me.. to pi$$ off Russians on losing Tartus and Latakia bases? you tell me..

    American exceptionalism doctrine? Influence of Israel on politics? S.Arabia and Quatar bribing Cute Clinton Clan like hell? You choose.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2198958
    Marcellogo
    Participant

    I wouldn’t think two 280+m long carriers with 40 F-35s each, combined with 6 Destroyers, 13 Frigates, 7 SSNs and 4 SSBNs constituted a weak navy. In fact, I can only count about 4 navies on the planet that are stronger than that and for at least 2 of those nations, most of the people are living in abject poverty and crapping in the streets across much of the nation.

    When they have sprang forth all of a sudden? Until yesterday, Uk had zero carriers and zero planes…

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2199593
    Marcellogo
    Participant

    Indeed; the Italian vs. French Navy comparison is really quite unfavourable to the latter when one considers the extra resources the French are working with.

    My philosophy is to limit ambitions (the scope of national interest) and then ensure one can robustly execute within that limited scope. If you can’t do it well, don’t do it at all. And of course, a single carrier is incapable of doing anything well.

    Both the French and British Navies today fall into the category of nations trying to write cheques they can’t cash (and hoping that nobody calls them out on it), and we all know why that is. Perhaps Italy was fortunate that its foray into empire-building was comparatively brief and disastrous — makes it easier to let go. 😉

    It was not so brief, nor so disastrous, Ethiopia was just the last, Somalia, Erithrea and Lybia just another matter.
    Yes, we somewhat limited our own ambition or better illusion coming back to the concept of “Enlarged Mediterranean” (i.e. + the oil route to Persian Gulf) we had during the Cold War.
    Still , we do it robustly as you say, sparing nothing about quality, almost in our first rank ships, still costructed on a proprietary standard superior to the NATO one and with our trademark overload of artillery and armament precisely because we aspect to operate in some very demanding environments with simply no space to deploy a standard task force with ships covering one with the other.
    Actually we have just started a massive program of naval construction, aimed to build those category of ships we somewhat lagged behind other navies (amphibious and support) + a series of a dozen and more 32+ knot “patrol ships” each armed the more or the less as a standard frigate in other ones, so almost for the navy , no complaint at all on our side…

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2199986
    Marcellogo
    Participant

    Think at the airstrip or the catapult needed for such a launch!
    Maybe is language difference , we used this term for conventional carrier when compared to the V/STOL or better STOVL ones
    Stobar? It is not for Short Take Off But Arrested Recovery? Kutnetsov, Ljiaoing, Vikrimandyta?

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2200045
    Marcellogo
    Participant

    I think you mean CATOBAR.

    Yes, i’m old school, before STOBAR acronym use.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2200056
    Marcellogo
    Participant

    Well it depends on how you conceive French interests I guess. If you think they extend to reliving the glory days of empire in Syria, then sure you need a carrier for that. A more limited conception (Western/Central Europe, North/West Africa) , maybe not.

    Another factor is the one that JSR alluded to — the French Navy can hardly scrape together a single carrier battle group worthy of the name. Remove the carrier from the equation and the MN suddenly looks a lot more respectable.

    For a medium size navy a CTOL carrier can be in the end more a burden than a liability
    Let’s compare them with us (Italy) as an example: we have a similar if not identical destroyer/frigate line and 1+1 STOL carriers (and we have not to split it in Mediterranean and Atlantic).
    Difference is that while our own medium ships are conceived to operate indipendently one from the other (Aster 30 on frigates, more capable radars, Strales CIWS systems, medium calibre main gun, task force command room in each ship…) while their own are bound to operate in group.
    So their fleet end up to be at carrier service instead than the contrary without adding so much more capabilities to justify the effort when compared to our own flat decks.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2201488
    Marcellogo
    Participant

    The specific mention of “invisible” aircraft was likely made to get the message right across to the murican fanboys, who bragged about the F-22s intercepting the Syrian jets without them even knowing it, that Russia has been tracking these “invisible” aircrafts all along.

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CuUG0sUXEAAHupp.jpg:large
    https://t.co/13EViFED2H

    ^^ Russian spokesman had mentioned about specific knowledge about where the official western jihadi supporters are based in Syria and specifically in Aleppo. The reports had mentioned that the reason for so much effort from the western Jihadi supporters on the diplomatic front was due to the fact that there was over 200 “uniformed” jihadi supporters trapped inside eastern Aleppo. Their best bet is to sneak into the Kurdish pocket and that is where these Jihadi supporters are likely to cross over or have already crossed over. So there is a need for Syrian forces to isolate the Kurdish pocket from the moderate terrorists held locations. It would be good to have those western Jihadis supporters to be captured alive. several of them are likely to be already dead.

    Few battle field reports from the front line. And all along I fail to understand the utter lack of priority from the Russian side for developing a proper armed UAV on the likes of earlier proposed Sukhoi’s Zond series.

    The terrorists have kept the civilians as human shields in the eastern Aleppo region and this has now slowed down the Syrian army advance. There is only one way to get those terrorists roaming in the alleys and that is with the use of armed drones. Unfortunately Russia doesn’t have anything to offer and only guys in the game are China and Iran. There is a need to being in as many armed Chinese drone as possible to scan the eastern Aleppo and strike at these terrorists.

    I’m a avid followers of all those thing but…

    …this isNOT the place.
    I warmy invite ALL there to open an account on twitter and look at the excellent posters mentioned in the map top angle, to which I would add the more western-oriented Aghatocle of Syracuse and Oryx blog (filo rebels are instead just rubbish hijadi propaganda)to have a great day to day, minute by minute update of the field situation before of just posting there.
    Said so this is an Aviation discussion thread and such have to remain.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2201498
    Marcellogo
    Participant

    IMHO , 5 minutes for all component set up time is grossly underestimate number , didnt the NEBO SVU take over 20 minutes to set up ?.Moreover, to cross networked those SAM batteries together ,you need some sort of link between them. Which either mean electric cable ( not mobile ) or a data link ( which can be detected by RWR ), another problem is that those link are limited by radar horizon , so even those the SAM launched doesn’t have to be at the same place , they cant be positioned very far from each others.

    Yes, and ?
    With all respect it seems me that you there are looking at a forest and seeing just trees .
    It is not 5 , 7 or 10 minutes what matter (just the curiosity: how much time it takes to a strike mission on a pretermined target to just take off? ) is the fact that the whole systems is coinceved to be:
    -higly mobile
    – redundant
    -overlapping
    -networkcentered
    – multisensor
    and with CIWS and jammers everywhere to protect batteries and radar.
    So the idea of detecting such asset with a satellite (this what the idea of starfish prime) is simply absurd.
    You have also to consider that limitations they have, like the one of radar horizon need appropriate tactics to be exploited: let’s forget launching SDB from 20K altitude.
    And just don’t try to fly F-22 (but also F-15E) like we europeans did with Tornado during Cold War also.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXV #2201605
    Marcellogo
    Participant

    Haha no they aren’t. Tell me. What is the Pak Fa lagging so behind on stealth wise ?

    Like any technology, stealth was never going to be the be all and end all. Besides that F 117 laying in that corn field in Serbia, every technical advantage will be met with counter technology. I don’t think the Americans understand this.

    Look at the work China is doing.

    The end of stealth? New Chinese radar capable of detecting ‘invisible …

    http://www.scmp.com › News › China
    5 days ago – In a statement posted on its website on Sunday, CETC said China’s first “single-photon quantum radar system” had “important military …

    First, is absolutely not the first one. We got it . http://www.ansa.it/scienza/notizie/rubriche/tecnologie/2013/07/11/primo-radar-fotonico-_9008500.htmlhttp://www.lanazione.it/pisa/cronaca/2014/03/20/1041746-pisano_radar_cuore_fotonico.shtmlhttps://www.researchitaly.it/en/understanding/press-media/news/a-photonic-radar-for-air-and-sea-traffic-management/

    For all the rest photonic radars and Software Definited Radio technologies are being researched in several countries, so at most China just joined the trend.
    Said so, it’s quite strange such a promising technology has actually received so little attention.

Viewing 15 posts - 811 through 825 (of 1,560 total)