dark light

Marcellogo

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,396 through 1,410 (of 1,560 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2177901
    Marcellogo
    Participant

    Turkey is openly hostile to Syrian regime and Israel is known to bombard them occasionally so some deterrence can’t hurt.

    As repeadetly affirmed there , this is the first thing thart Russian development is aimed to settle, something they achieve just by deployng there

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2177903
    Marcellogo
    Participant

    You might exhibit some kind of teacher’s syndrome but that doesn’t work on me.. Let me sum this whole argument up:

    1. A video with four Su-24Ms and Il-78 over Homs gets posted by TR1 [response #80]
    2. You imply that the video is not from Syria, but from some military parade, bcs the birds are allegedly too low [response #86]
    3. My reply is that the vid looks legit [response #88]
    4. Your reply is that the tree top at the end of the vid proves your point [response #89]
    5. A questions comes what exactly is wrong with the tree top and how does that prove that the vid is not from Syria [response #91]
    6. Instead of replying to this simple question you start some smarta$$ lectures which no one cares about [response #92]
    7. My repeated question [response #93]
    8. More smarta$$ lectures from you [response #94]
    9. My repeated question [response #105]
    10. Even more smarta$$ lectures from you, not explaining your point, at all… [response #129]
    11. The satellite pic proves that there are, indeed, Su-24s in Syria and that the vid was most likely legit [response #163]
    12. My repeated question [response #165]
    13. Your grasping at straws [responses #182 and #194]

    You have not been patient enough.. it was me who was patient, in the first place.. you still haven’t explained your claim from the response #86, were proven wrong in the meantime but instead of admiting that you continue to play a smarta$$.. you can do that with your kids, I don’t mind, but it’s adults you’re dealing with on this forum.. so act like one..

    To put some sense in this bickering, I had read on a non-english newspaper that Syria has closed its own aerospace to civilian flight for one day to allow the low pass of those formations over Homs in order to raise morale of population.
    Now, I can’t find the news anymore on the site, i’ll try further but if someone other can crosscheck the fact it would explain the apparent oddity of such a move.

    in reply to: The truth about the F-22 #2178224
    Marcellogo
    Participant

    I’ve had mainly processing power on my mind. But it’s a fair point..

    I have never found the (low-speed) maneuvrability of the F-15 as too impressive.. The F-22, OTOH does pretty much the same things as latest Sukhois love to do..

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a1mO0aTJp5w

    The question about radar is another byproduct of a certain emphasys about AESA superiority over previous systems.
    Someone genuinely think that having an AESA antenna would made any radar automatically superior to the previous ones.
    Well, it is not like so, even putting the best antenna available on it wouldn’t make a F-5 or MiG 21 (and F-16 is not much better) size radar better to the AGW-9 on the F-14, neither to mention the actual PESA radar on the Mig-31 or the Su-35.
    Changing an antenna with AESA modules would certainly better radar performance of a given radar, but even a Bars radar with it on wouldn’t be superior to a PESA IRBIS, like the proposed ones for the F-16 wouldn’t surpass the Typoon’s one. .

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2178502
    Marcellogo
    Participant

    I’m guessing:

    primary targets are Nusra, Islamic Front, Jaish al Fatah, Army of Conquest

    secondary targets are FSA, Division 30, Southern Front

    tertiary targets are ISIS

    Well, for targeting the secondary ones you would need rather a microscope than satellites or UAV.:rolleyes:

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2178644
    Marcellogo
    Participant

    Actually the Bulgaria route is much more distance as you have to go wide across Turkey and it is un safe if planes have trouble. It is much more friendly to fly over Irak/Iran airbases.

    I will not be surprised if Putin announce that this whole operation is for safety and security of Israel than no western countries will be able to oppose it.
    and it will further alienate the Arab street as they think Putin is bombing them for Israel and no one is opposing it.

    Still Su-30SM passed over Europe the same, they were the first to be spotted and remained the same exact number once such route was closed.
    Don’t know exactly for what reason it happened like so, maybe they were stationed on Sevastopol or maybe they doesn’t like modern fighters passing trough a war zone.
    In every case if you have to pass trough Caspian Sea and all of Iran, Iraq and Syria and get to Latakia that is on the sea I think is more distance anyway.
    Did someone know if Azerbaijan allow passage?

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2178738
    Marcellogo
    Participant

    Yeh, Blah is all we can say today pretty much.

    I’m also thinking what the hell was Putin thinking 12 months ago! Was he giving up on Assad and Syria all together, or was he planning this move knowing nothing much will change despite USAF and coalition bombing for a year, so he will wait for the right moment to step in and look good on the news 🙂

    Anyhow,

    I’m waiting to hear now about those Mig-29M2 finally coming. Supposedly they were built and ready for delivery couple years ago for SAAF and were even considered to be sold to Serbian AF.Not sure if that was disputed later.

    IMHO they had to wait until the Iran nuclear deal was concluded, just note how involvement started up slowly and ramped up after it survived US Congress votes.
    Ukraine crisis also messed up things great time, sparkling irrationalistic (N.B. it is not the same than irrational) game of action and reaction between Russia and NATO: they closed Bulgarian airspace and so they had to find a longer and more risky route.

    In every case Russia can capitalize now the fact it can have friends (few) and antagonists (many) but no one is in such bad terms or so powerful to refuse to deal with or ignore what it say .
    So they can just put themselves as a middleman and strike separate deals with all the involved parties, even if they are sworn enemies between one’s another.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2179220
    Marcellogo
    Participant

    When you have such militant/terrorist movement then its natural people would join them , Its not unique to Russia that people have joined ISIS or Taliban or Mujhaid etc

    Selling arms to Iraq to fight ISIS and fighting directly are two different thing.

    ISIS is as much as a threat to Russia as it is to China or India or Japan , you dont find China or Japan or Vietnam sending troops to fight them.

    ISIS is a primary threat to Moderate Sunnis and Shias followed by threat to West , Involving into ISIS mess is inviting direct retribution from them for no rhyme or reason or national interest involved.

    At best training or providing arms to Sirya or Iraq is fine nothing beyond that , there are enough Shias and other nationality available out there to fight ISIS

    I don’t get this line of thought: how the same considerations doesn’t apply to members of the international coalition also?

    Also because most of them have nothing to do with Syria, ME and have not any internal terroristic problem with wahabi scums.
    Russia is near, has a long time friendship with Syria and has a enormously great resilience to hardship, so how can be possibly be afraid of something others, far smaller and less armed are?

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2179222
    Marcellogo
    Participant

    I don’t get this line of thought: how the same considerations doesn’t apply to members of the international coalition also?

    Also because most of them have nothing to do with Syria, ME and have not any internal terroristic problem with wahabi scums.
    Russia is near, has a long time friendship with Syria and has a enormously great resilience to hardship, so how can be possibly be afraid of something others, far smaller and less armed are?

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2179258
    Marcellogo
    Participant

    Ehy, wait a minute.
    This one, if confirmed would be a bomb.
    http://www.almasdarnews.com/article/russian-air-force-given-full-access-to-the-hmaymat-airbase-in-west-latakia/
    So, the Su-30 were purchased by Syaaf?:eek:

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2179420
    Marcellogo
    Participant

    Look like Su-24

    Make sense, given that also Syaaf have them in its own inventory logistical problems would not be so big like in the case of Su-30 or even Su-25.

    in reply to: CAMM, short-range infrared or radar? #2179809
    Marcellogo
    Participant

    Italo-French joint acquisition was a short-lived phase, only applying to two ship classes (one of them consisting of only two ships each), while amphibious ships, patrol vessels, supply ships etc. remained national. And now it’s over. Their FREMMs have always differed significantly, & those now building have got even further apart. The Italians plan new escorts which are entirely Italian.

    Yes those kind of multinational cooperation is now viewed as a great error there.
    To put it simply, traditionally MMI ships have always been built on a quite peculiar, extremely high standard, so our minimal requirements on armaments (above all Artillery and Ciws), command systems, damage containment, speed are just impossible to fulfill in a multinational program, above all together with French and British that are focused into a combat environment right opposite to our own.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2179854
    Marcellogo
    Participant

    The more interesting question now is that if RuAF does plan to carrier out airstrikes will there dragging their feet on purchases of new PGM come to hurt them now? Not to mention that the smallest PGM that Russia has on offer at the moment is the KAB-500 which is still a big bomb. American equivalent is the GBU-16 or GBU-48. Not good if you are going to be targeting IS in urban city and want to avoid the bad press of collateral damage.

    Anyone have any opinions on this?

    There is many way to kill a cat.
    S-25L rocket,Ugroza conversion kit for standard ones (but also unguided one are quite precise), At-16, Kh-25,Kh-29, Kh-59.
    Russians have Jdam type bombs but they are definitely not their weapon of choice.
    Also because to exploit their full potential you need scores of drones and a very precise satellite signal, something they fulfilled just recently.
    In any case they can also habe the occasion to give a try of the new weapons presented at MAKS.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2179861
    Marcellogo
    Participant

    you dont do Close airsupoort when you want to defeat in less than 3 days. CAS is for slow motion war.

    C-SAR : Combat Search And Rescue.

    Russia has a lot of CAS anyway.

    in reply to: CAMM, short-range infrared or radar? #2180069
    Marcellogo
    Participant

    In fact it’s sound like being a good concept. Pack a punch in a smaller, cheaper, faster platform that you can broadly disseminate.

    Add UAV with a high speed recovery mode and you can avoid fragile and capricious VTOL design (wind speed). A sea speed just under 50knts will let you recover something rather heavy able to carry an use full load in challenging weather.

    EDIT:
    the vessel depicted above seems even to big.

    4500tons, max 32knt, 22knt cruise speed:the one depicted is the”heavy” version with dual -band AESA radar and OTOMAT/MILAS launcher. We will take them as a substitute of the Soldati class “Pattugliatori di Squadra” (I think it is a quite our ownpeculiar type of ship, so no translation available).
    The rest of them would be on a lighter configuration, still with CAMM+ however but with standard fittings for humanitarian aid and immigrants rescue.
    Tons went high because of that type of mission more than about weaponry, so if someone in only interested in waqing war :apologetic: it could be reduced…
    The core of the 12 items order would

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXV #2180158
    Marcellogo
    Participant

    I’m a little puzzled how you seems not to consider how also a jet can recuperate the energy it lose, using its afterburner and/or diving.
    In every case the Meteor advantage lie in its ownterminal manoevrability due to ramjet when compared with a rocket propelled, while the idea it can just backflip and attack again seems me quite difficult to happen in a real combat.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,396 through 1,410 (of 1,560 total)