dark light

paul1867

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,081 through 1,095 (of 1,315 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: What is this tool for? #864451
    paul1867
    Participant

    The long thread suggests that it had to cope with varying thicknesses such as a bench. However once clamped to the bench only the hex hole is accessible from the grooved side. So clamp to bench, insert something hex shaped and turn item using slots as guides.
    The tool is clearly specific to a job and does not look “home” made is it not odd it has no tool number. How can you order one from the stores?

    in reply to: What is this tool for? #864626
    paul1867
    Participant

    On closer inspection it would seem that hole os hexagonal with grooves radiating from each point. Surely this must have a purpose. Is that a ball swivel on the end of the thread? If so that would need to bear on flattish surface. Maybe there is another part?

    in reply to: What is this tool for? #864638
    paul1867
    Participant

    It reminds me of a brake caliper piston push back tool. However, the clamp is designed for operation by fingers as it is fitted with knurled knob and not a hexagon for spanner application. Therefore not too much force which fits with being made from brass. Maybe spiral pin or similar insertion.

    in reply to: General Discussion #274246
    paul1867
    Participant

    Thanks Moggy but still not working!

    Sorry try again will check it this time

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-32101785

    Confirmed working.

    in reply to: Lee Rigby memorial unveiled #1832105
    paul1867
    Participant

    Thanks Moggy but still not working!

    Sorry try again will check it this time

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-32101785

    Confirmed working.

    in reply to: Still hope for Manston? #482667
    paul1867
    Participant

    Paul F
    Yes indeed I agree with all you have said. I take your point about mothballing but that wasn’t quite what I had in mind. With the canals and disused railway lines we built across them, sold them off and filled canals and cuttings up. Now we are busy trying to restore many of these canals and railway lines for various reasons. My suggestion is that these and airfields are national assets and that they should be ring fenced against development and that they should retain their planning rights. If there is no immediate use for them allow none destructive leased use so that they are always recoverable at any later date. Specifically with regard to Manston if no aviation solution can be found allow leased usage of existing builders and suitably located industrial buildings and return the rest of the land to agriculture. However, retain the national asset of being able to fly planes in and out of the plot even if a new runway has to be built say in 50 years time. It seems to me that developers are keen to obtain these airfields because they are available and presumably now classed as brown field, however, if no airfield had been there it would still be agricultural land and probably no development allowed.

    Haven’t there been aircraft related business at Manston right up until it was closed and could this not be encouraged, I thought this was all part of the original and River Oak plans.

    We have a similar recent case with the Military Railway at Long Marston this was a complete full size rail system for training military personnel. This should have been gifted to the National Rail Museum who could have operated it as a working system using stock that is otherwise basically captive at York and Shildon. But what are we getting houses, holiday homes and Underground stock storage.. There appears to be some provision for keeping some of the track but there does not appear to be any clear plans.

    Charlie

    I agree over pollution but it is the hot topic, along with global warming (or is it climate change or isit….) that are band wagons that can be used to advantage and justify almost anything. I am keen to get these trucks off the roads and back onto the rail system where they belong. Oh and bring back the Scarab, battery powered of course, for delivery from the station to the local supermarkets etc. Win win all round, less congestion, less pollution and increased revenue for the rail infrastructure with a positive knock on effect for passengers.

    It’s a pity that Manston is a bit too far away for the runway to operate for Operation Stack, otherwise it would be ideal and presumable save a lot of money over any alternative solution.

    Regards Paul

    in reply to: Dambuster Les Munro To Sell Medals #871376
    paul1867
    Participant

    Dam good show all round chaps.

    in reply to: Dambuster Les Munro To Sell Medals #872239
    paul1867
    Participant

    Thanks for posting. Thank you to Lord Ashcroft for a win win solution with Les Munro getting the respect he richly deserves.

    paul1867
    Participant

    Paul – not quite sure why your happy it’s buried again.

    Hi David. I certainly know nothing about the pros and cons of preservation other than I have read on various threads on this forum. I am sure you are right and totally agree with your previous post 270, I just thought weighing up the pros and cons that it was better out of reach of souvenir hunters who can do a lot of damage just for the personal satisfaction of having one part and that it seems that this aeroplane is unlikely to be recovered any time soon if ever.

    Regards

    Paul

    paul1867
    Participant

    Thanks for the update Nick very pleased she is still safely buried, let’s hope she remains so.

    in reply to: Still hope for Manston? #483579
    paul1867
    Participant

    Best to soften the criticisms of people I think!

    Shady shenanigans is my idea of soft compared with actually what went on, trying to hide that financial interest was still held in Manston, exposed in Select Committee. Read the track record and financial affairs of others involved. I can think of far more appropriate words but kept it moderate.
    Remember what Mrs G promised for Manston?
    Look into the history of the people involved, did you see the fully documented website “thaneteye”, sadly now gone, that gave the full background to these people. Watch the Select Committee meeting, it is laughable and sick making and they certainly were not fooling the MPs. If the cap fits…..

    This is how we thought about the canals and railways, do we never learn from our previous mistakes. I am not saying we necessarily have a use now but that we should not destroy the infrastructure and make sure it is available if future generations need it. Because of relatively short term financial difficulties we see the family silver being sold off for relatively small amounts and these are then lost for ever.

    We have seen the French proposals for banning diesels in Paris, how far away are they from banning trucks passing through their country. How far away are we from banning trucks passing through England and Wales to get to and from Ireland? Maybe that illusive battery will be created that makes long distance electric transport possible, still needs charging though. I do not know about the ins and outs of comparing the pollution produced by an aeroplane compared with the equivalent number of trucks but I would just like to keep all options open into the future.

    Just letting it go is what we have done in the past and history is showing that to be wrong.

    Regards

    Paul

    in reply to: Still hope for Manston? #483581
    paul1867
    Participant

    The runway size make it important infrastructure and a national asset, as the local MP agrees. River Oak thinks it can make a go of it as a freight terminal and they should be allowed to try. There are good rail and road links and I think that the whole way we handle freight in this country is going to dramatically change in the coming decades and, as has already started, move to rail. HS2 is not about travel times as the popular press would lead you to believe but about capacity including freight capacity. Diesels are the new enemy and radical changes are needed to get long distance trucks off the road and freight back on to the railways where it always belonged. But, of course, when the powers that be decide that we no longer need transport infrastructure what do they do, fill it up, rip it up and sell it off cheap to the sort of shady characters we see involved at Manston. As I have sprouted before we have now decided we like canals and are busy digging them out and restoring them all be it for a different use. Rail reinstatement projects that would have been thought impossible 20 years ago are happening in many places. Porthmadog has even allowed trains to cross and run down a main road.
    My point is that transport infrastructure such as airfields and rail goods yards are difficult if not impossible to reinstate. They are all national assets and should be ring fenced against any development that would not allow the reinstatement of its transport use. So even if an operator cannot be found for Manston the infrastructure and planning use should be kept and the land leased back to its original use, agriculture.

    If you are in any doubt about the motivations and shenanigans of the present owners then please watch the Select Committee meeting on Manston mentioned below, if for no other reason than to deprive these “characters” of Manston then River Oak should be given a chance.

    in reply to: Still hope for Manston? #483585
    paul1867
    Participant

    Second that. Just for once it would be nice to see the real goings on uncovered.

    in reply to: General Discussion #278045
    paul1867
    Participant

    Thanks for posting the pics.
    Have visited a number of times and is truly an excellent museum. You can spend a day in the Warehouse alone. Very worthwhile taking the guided tour in the Warehouse. Went to the last Railfest there in 2012 which was absolutely excellent. Will certainly go again if they hold another one. This is the museum that arranged to bring together the six surviving A4s, despite my best efforts I did not manage to get to see them but for rail buffs this was equivalent to bringing over Vera.

    So if you are interested in this sort of thing I have just stumbled across this Military Railfest at Long Marston http://www.trainofevents.co.uk/pages/military-railfest-2015.html. Little info yet but I will certainly be trying to get to that. Hope to be at Coventry Airfield for the 2nd so as Long Marston is only 25m away might spend a few days and visit Midlands Air Museum again as well.

    Sadly always something to take the icing off, took a look at the airfield and saw the closed museum planes. Are they still there?

    in reply to: National Rail Museum @ York #1832744
    paul1867
    Participant

    Thanks for posting the pics.
    Have visited a number of times and is truly an excellent museum. You can spend a day in the Warehouse alone. Very worthwhile taking the guided tour in the Warehouse. Went to the last Railfest there in 2012 which was absolutely excellent. Will certainly go again if they hold another one. This is the museum that arranged to bring together the six surviving A4s, despite my best efforts I did not manage to get to see them but for rail buffs this was equivalent to bringing over Vera.

    So if you are interested in this sort of thing I have just stumbled across this Military Railfest at Long Marston http://www.trainofevents.co.uk/pages/military-railfest-2015.html. Little info yet but I will certainly be trying to get to that. Hope to be at Coventry Airfield for the 2nd so as Long Marston is only 25m away might spend a few days and visit Midlands Air Museum again as well.

    Sadly always something to take the icing off, took a look at the airfield and saw the closed museum planes. Are they still there?

Viewing 15 posts - 1,081 through 1,095 (of 1,315 total)