dark light

paul1867

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 10 posts - 1,306 through 1,315 (of 1,315 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Filton Airfield is now history #968267
    paul1867
    Participant

    What concerns me is they keep selling Rolls Royce engines to China. In a few years, poor copies will flood the market. How short sighted.

    Same thing happened with Decca Marine Radar having models made in S Korea in the 80’s. Decca engineers had to go out there to show them how to do it. They were machining duplexers out of solid, who can compete with that! The writing was on the wall and now we say Decca, who?

    in reply to: Making war interesting #968273
    paul1867
    Participant

    less interesting +1

    I did think about asking whether the V1 at Duxford could be restored to flying condition, but decided that was in abysmal taste.

    Project probably wouldn’t have got past the first flight anyway.

    in reply to: Airfield photos – 'Then and Now' #968382
    paul1867
    Participant

    A great thread – really enjoying the contributions!

    Second that, many thanks for all of these and taking the trouble to create and post, they are much appreciated. Keen interest in the “then and now” style pics in all subjects.

    in reply to: And Now For Something Completely Different Thread MK3 #968400
    paul1867
    Participant

    Thanks aeronut 2008. Yes I see a single part rigid tow bar working easily in two dimensions but difficult to see in 3 dimensions especially on take off and landing when one craft may be airborne and the other not. It looks like the UK version is a two part rigid bar articulated in the middle at what appears to be a trolley for the “safety” cable which would allow plenty of articulation in the vertical plane. The US version appears so short that even with ball joints at both ends there would appear to be insufficient movement in the vertical plane. Obviously there was though.

    in reply to: Long shot mystery object #968739
    paul1867
    Participant

    Can you describe what the mechanism shown does, is it driven by the mangle or vice versa, or does it move the mangles apart? Are those electrical cables? If so where do they go? Does the shaft to which the black cast bracket is attached rotate and is it connected to anything inside?
    Does that arm protruding from the bottom of the plate with 4 screws pass up between the screws and the two cog wheels and perhaps operate the two matching dogs? So if you pushed the arm upwards does it operate levers that lift off the two matching dogs linked by the spring?
    That plate also has a bolt in a slot with a spring going upwards, would that be connected to the third large dog?
    I’m thinking it is a feed mechanism with the two small dogs preventing unwanted backward movement and the large dog used to rotate the mechanism and the mangles. If these rotate the mangles then this is very probably a feed mechanism feed direction depending on if there is any other gearing. Are there more gears? Is there anything to show what operates the large dog which would push clockwise?
    If it was a wick the top would need to be open, do you have a pic of the top?
    Looks like seams on the sides so these wood be rolled tubes rust indicates steel. Cast end caps probably alloy as no rust.
    I think a picture of the large top end would help a lot as it looks like it might be closed.
    In relation to lighthouse wick looked here but could not see anything like this.
    http://www.dejaelaine.com/lighthouselights.html

    Certainly interesting objects, sorry all questions and no answers. Sure somebody out there will recognise them.

    in reply to: And Now For Something Completely Different Thread MK3 #968765
    paul1867
    Participant

    Another glider.
    http://i262.photobucket.com/albums/ii120/Duggy009/C-46E-waco-Sept28-1950-1.jpg

    Can someone explain how that works please?

    in reply to: Airfield preservation #972243
    paul1867
    Participant

    Not aware of one but now is the time. Our engineering heritage has not been valued in the past and much has been allowed to be destroyed. Over the last ten to twenty years I think there has been a massive increase in public awareness of our great engineering past which is reflected in the ever growing number of restored
    aeroplanes and steam engines, reopened canals and railway lines. This is extending to new builds both in steam and planes and an ever increasing number of museums. This is all great but we must stop the destruction of what is left before it is too late as developers, aware of this increasing interest, now tend to pull down as quickly as possible to avoid getting embroiled in debate. Of course, you cannot save everything but some examples have very historic significance and at the very least should be comprehensively surveyed. RAF Sealand South Camp is a good example where I understand a survey was originally promised but demolition started without warning and all is now gone.
    http://www.28dayslater.co.uk/forums/showthread.php/58435-RAF-Sealand/page2

    An RAF Swingate radar mast was taken down without warning however, since then the site has been listed although this may not save the remaining masts.
    http://www.kenthistoryforum.co.uk/index.php?topic=4392.0

    We have the Statutory List of Buildings of special Architectural or Historic Interest and the Scheduled Ancient Monuments do these or could they provide a class of listing which would at least require full documentation/survey before demolition. Or does this already exist as you hear of excavations being halted to allow archaeological digs.

    Presumably what is needed is a body of active enthusiasts that could document and present cases to these organisations to allow at least documentation before demolition.

    Ah well I suppose one can dream on, until it is too late.

    in reply to: Filton airfield closing #955694
    paul1867
    Participant

    National Resource?

    Is there not an argument that all airfields, railway track beds and rail goods yards should be ring fenced against development? We didn’t think we needed the canals and now many are being developed as a leisure resource. Many old railway lines are being brought back into use and freight use is growing year on year. The point is once sold off and built on nothing can bring them back. They are not just any old fields they have specific uses which cannot be relocated. The family silver should not be sold off for short term gain nor should change of use be allowed to bring windfall profits which can be the driving force for selling off.

    in reply to: ARROW ACTIVE 2 G ABVE #958001
    paul1867
    Participant

    Thanks AMB.
    The Flight archive entries I have found so far are for a September 1 1968 which actually mentions a Tiger Club display

    http://forum.keypublishing.com/picture.php?albumid=360&pictureid=2491

    http://forum.keypublishing.com/picture.php?albumid=360&pictureid=2493

    Also an Easter show in 1970

    http://forum.keypublishing.com/picture.php?albumid=360&pictureid=2492

    It would be interesting to see this which refers to the 1968 Easter air show as the second one. So two air shows in 1968 it would seem.

    http://forum.keypublishing.com/picture.php?albumid=360&pictureid=2494

    It would seem likely that the Tiger Club, being local to Lydd is likely to have been present at many air shows in this period so will not be possible to establish an exact year.

    Thanks for the interest.

    in reply to: ARROW ACTIVE 2 G ABVE #958147
    paul1867
    Participant

    Thanks for interest guys.
    I have collected all the photos I could find on the internet and whilst it has worn the race number for many years it only seems to have had the red and white chequered scheme (with the slightly narrower red back) between about 1963 and before 1977, from around 1977 onwards the red dorsal stripe was slightly wider and extended along the root of the fin.

Viewing 10 posts - 1,306 through 1,315 (of 1,315 total)