Flying Start by Hugh Dundas is the most modest and truthful account that I have read in many a year. Strongly recommended.
AIRPLANE? Ugh. Aeroplane or aircraft please! The dumbed down BBC standards are abysmal and continue to decline. They usually say TRAIN instead of the correct RAILWAY station. Why?
I’m interested! 🙂
Colour me confused but I’m sure the V tailed straight wing ancestor of the Scimitar was the type 508. I saw it in an unburnt state at Predannack in the late 1960s or early 70s. I wrote to Flight and Aeroplane at the time lamenting that such a rare type was going to consumed by flame to provide training for firemen. This was before the FAA museum was up and running, unfortunately.
Thank you, Biggles 1099. Exceptionally good and interesting photos.
Could be a Snow crop sprayer?
Varies with the Mark number, weight, clean or flaps, power on or off – and even airfield elevation and temperature!
I think Wolfgang Spate’s TEST PILOTS deserves to be on the list as well as Lerche’s autobiography (forgotten the title!). He probably was the last German to fly the Dornier Do 335.
Arguably the nicest looking Barracuda was the Griffon engined Mark V. Unfortunately the flying characteristics were so woefully poor that none were ever issued to a unit.
The Rhodesians fitted 20 mm cannons to their Alouette IIIs. Well described in the outstanding book of that era Winds of Destruction.
If I correctly remember, a number of weapons of varying calibres were trialled including rotating barrel efforts but it all came to naught under Treasury pressure (or so it was claimed). We ended up with the 7.62 mm GPMG – to the surprise of nobody! The Rhodesians had fitted 20 mm cannons to their helicopters and found them to be a game changer.
The really rare models seem to be the MiG 19 Farmer – and of course the MiG 25 Foxbat.
I don’t want to be a wet blanket but that doesn’t look like a radio receiver, more like a field telephone exchange or centre. :confused:
Astounding!
I’m afraid I have to agree with sconnor. Quality and historical accuracy is not what a TV company relishes. A ‘celebrity’ big name and as much stock footage (however inappropriate) as possible is the aim. Now add a deafening music background – all for our benefit of course as we have been dumbed down!