dark light

soyuz1917

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 585 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • soyuz1917
    Participant

    The whole Peru contract is fishy. The Peruvian government insisted MiG create a Peruvian subsidiary when they awarded the contract. What exactly the Peruvian subsidiary does besides kick back money to Peruvian officials is anyone’s guess. The numbers in MiG’s annual report (Russian law requires they disclose all the Peruvian subs financials) make ZERO sense. The most likely though the most difficult to prove explanation is they are having issues greasing the right hands in Peru. While RSK MiG has been gutted rather thoroughly by UAC there is still enough of an entity left that they can fix 9 lousy airframes. The work on the UPG’s for India isn’t delayed as far as I know and if they can do that why would this pose a challenge requiring over a year of delays?

    soyuz1917
    Participant

    On the civilian side the most prevalent helos in Russia after the Mi-17’s are the Robinson R22/44/66’s and the Ka-226 is too big, heavy and expensive to fill that kind of role.

    in reply to: China's hacking into F-35 led to spiraling costs? #2342385
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    When the Phobos-Grunt probe failed the Ruskies made absurd accusations about HARP and and US radars, and Chinese gray market parts — anything to blame some foreigner. Sad to see Americans resorting to the same sort of BS only concerning the F-35. Its speaks to an inferiority complex stemming from what is an increasingly obvious American decline….

    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread #2026487
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    Yantar has the Ivan Gren, and will get the follow on ships in the class. The contract for the second ship has already been awarded. Tonnage wise that’s more work than the all the 20380s currently in the pipe. They also have that 1 intelligence ship and all follow on hulls of the type. The yard has plenty of work. Severnayas monopoly is a bit disconcerting, but there are 2 new yards coming online in Russia in the next decade that will break the monopoly. The DSME-Zvezda yard, and Admiralty’s new yard outside of St. Pete will break the monopoly.

    in reply to: Russia to Send Syria Yak-130 Jets #2345346
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    And the Yemeni president Saleh took exile in the US less than a year ago, and he killed almost as many civilians as Assad trying to stay in power. The Pentagon has even admitted he provided them with false info about the location of terrorists so that US drone would eliminate regime opponents for him. Assad ending up like Saleh, but only in Moscow and not New York makes plenty of sense.

    in reply to: Russia to Send Syria Yak-130 Jets #2345371
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    Russia doesn’t see a new Syrian regime emerging. They see a decade long civil war with god only knows what emerging. The best case scenario is something like Iraq with ongoing mass killings on ethnic grounds and a central government that has virtually no control over vast swathes of its territory. The worst case scenario is another Afghanistan where the president of the country is really just the mayor of Kabul and doesn’t even control the 10 blocks around his presidential palace.

    Russia doesn’t really trade much with Afghanistan or Iraq. The bulk of this trade is Russia selling things to the US for Afghanistan and Iraq — namely helicopters. The US taxpayer is the one paying the bill and not the governments of these countries. That wont happen in Syria at least not with Obama in the White House. Both those market are largely closed to Russian interests though arguably more because of the horrid security conditions than anything having to do with foreign policy.

    If a regime does emerge after a couple hundred thousand are killed or turned into refugees it likely wont be democratic and likely will be stuffed full of Assad era elites Moscow can do business with then. Either way — better to get as much money out of the place today than to gamble on a murky future.

    Anyway, Lavrov and the SVR chief are both heading to Damascus to talk terms with Abbas even as we speak. I suspect they will be offering him that mansion outside Moscow and some Sberbank accounts for all his money.

    in reply to: Russia to Send Syria Yak-130 Jets #2345661
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    Syria without Assad will fall into sectarian strife like we see in Iraq only without the Americans there to stand up even a semblance of a national security force it will likely be far worse. Once the Syrian national army is gone the country will implode like Lebanon in the 80’s. There is no real organized democratic opposition. The opposition is down tribal lines and they will butcher each other for sport. The well educated urban elites in the opposition who get press time on Al Jazeera and on CNN are a tiny minority, and this tiny minority has already been sidelined in Egypt and will likely simply be butchered in Syria.

    Syria has a VAST uneducated class with no more than a 5th grade education. This is thanks largely to the currents regime robbing the country blind, but the fact remains that huge swathes of the population, a good 30%, are barely literate. And these barely literates will fight over the dead husk of the burned out state they inherit for years to come. It is profoundly naive to think any sort of real business will be done by any multinationals in Syria for decades to come. Putin has done the calculus and they figure they will get more out of Assad today than anyone will be able to get out of an Assad free Syria for the next generation. The Russians are pretty good at this kind of math.

    The Russians also have their own experience with these sorts of “transitions.” In 1991 people hated Brezhnev and all the party secretaries and today half the Russian population would like to see statues built to him. They run miniseries about him on Channel 1. Assad may well be remembered fondly by the next generation after the country is burned to ash in his absence. So they probably figure their helping him now will open doors in Syria in 20 years even if he is removed from power today. The entire national elite likely wont be displaced with Assad and should one of these Assad era officials climb to power they will be back in the Russian sphere quickly enough.

    in reply to: Russia to Send Syria Yak-130 Jets #2346241
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    Assad is finished and Moscow well understands this. The only question is how much of the national treasury he can loot and send to Moscow before hopping on the last Damascus-Moscow flight for the next 20 years. And I guess I’m kinda curious to see if Vlad will actually send a Rossiya tagged jet to pick him up or not :rolleyes:

    I suspect he gets a nice mansion outside of Moscow and one of those gold star Hero of Russia medals pinned to his narrow chest the moment he steps off the plane, and that’s the last we see of him for a long time. He’ll end up like that president of Kyrgyzstan who’s currently doing his exile in Russia too.

    Rososboronexport said it lost $4 billion in Libya and the Kremlin has admitted that the loss of Qaddafi cost Russia a total of $13 billion in contracts. Now $13 billion may not sound like a lot to the US with its 14 trillion dollar economy and $100 billion Facebook going public, but for Russia that’s fast approaching 1% of GDP. A number like that has to infuriate the Kremlin and make it want to lash out at Western interests. Its only natural that if you cost someone $13 billion they aren’t going to agree to let you rob them of a few billion more, and a couple thousand civilians be damned. Vlad just figures Syria is his way of getting his $13 billion back.

    At the end of the day Vlad has mono-towns he needs to keep fed, and employed, and the only thing they make is bomb and bullets and he needs people like Assad to buy the bombs and bullets because after all Russia cant exactly compete with China in the making stuffed teddy bears market. The Russian comparative advantage is in Vodka and killing machines, and Arabs don’t drink.

    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread #2026950
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    Pretty sure the 2004 redesign means the current hull essentially has no commonality with the 1993 design.

    in reply to: Pak-Fa Thread episode 19 #2359439
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    The PAK-FA and Su-35S are supposed to have as much avionic similarity as possible. The twin MFD setup is supposed to be identical. The only obvious difference is they use 2 different HUD’s.

    in reply to: Su-25 Frogfoot #2361122
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    Compared to the Cold War era when SPAAG’s and MANPAD were being churned out like candy and proliferated everywhere by both sides such low level air defense assets are, if anything, in short supply the world over today making aircraft like the Su-25 and A-10 vastly more suited for combat today than they were 30 years ago when they could have expected a life expectancy over the Fulda gap of about 20 minutes.

    The US is so confident of air superiority that low level air defense is all but ignored by the Pentagon. Avenger is the only real system deployed in the US today, and by Russian and Chinese standards its almost a joke both because it lacks guns, and radars, and because the numbers its been procured in are far too small. Of course, a Russia v. US scenario is completely absurd, but this same dynamic unfortunately exists in most every military today.

    The US and Russia have greatly restricted MANPAD exports, exporting dumbed down monkey models even when they do agree to export them to third countries. The IGLA’s Libya received for example were dumbed down models that couldn’t be individually detached from the bulky Strelets complex they came with so they couldn’t be legitimately shoulder fired or easily transported or hidden. And the Strelets complex itself was monkey modeled into a primitive variant unable to fire at night and only able to engage 2 targets at a time. In short, the Russians sold them garbage. The infinitely more sophisticated Barnaul system the Russians wont export — not even to Venezuela which got naked Iglas and the same downgraded Strelets systems.

    In Georgia UAV’s were far more vulnerable than any Su-25’s. Every UAV the Georgians sent up the Russians shot down. Nothing in the literature suggests the Georgians received any benefit from the UAV’s they managed to send up.

    The Su-25SM losses were more the result of poor tactics and horrible intelligence than any underlying problem with this kind of aircraft. The Russians went in too early with the Su-25’s. This kind of aircraft should not be the first aircraft deployed in theater. It comes in only after air defenses have been suppressed by higher tiered assets. Essentially no work was done on Georgian air defenses before the Su-25’s started doing their thing. The VVS simply had a very poor workup on the state of Georgian air defenses. Russian military intelligence dropped the ball. The presence of Ukrainian Buk’s in Georgia should not have surprised the VVS, but it did.

    Then there is issue of how many Su-25’s were actually shot down by Georgia and how many were lost to friendly fire. There is some evidence that all but 1 of the Su-25’s downed was shot down by trigger happy Russian soldiers who thought they were firing on Georgian aircraft. In fact if you read the CAST report on the August war, and buy their argument, Georgian air defenses proved uniquely impotent and the major threat to Russian pilots was from Russian soldiers on the ground.

    And finally, the utility of armed drones in conflicts involving near-peer adversaries with sophisticated electronic warfare capabilities is still highly questionable and not something I suspect any country wants to bet the farm on anytime soon. Iran supposedly did just bring down the most sophisticated US drone in service today, and Iran is hardly the most sophisticated of potential opponents. Manned CAS airplanes have a future so long as datalinks and satellites remain vulnerable.

    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread #2027153
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    http://shturmnovosti.com/view.php?id=32697

    Fire on board the Gepard K-335.

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part- 4 #1795362
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    Something like 5 minutes.

    The American SBIRS system will only give 20 minutes of warning for launches from the Northern Fleet and something like 18 minute for launches from further north. 12 v. 20 is essentially nothing. The sheer size of Russia lets them make do without satellites. It is not as if an American president is going to have a solid hour to sit there and contemplate the end of the world.

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part- 4 #1795367
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    Podvig did a pretty good job deconstructing that Lieber article 5 years back.

    Essentially, they are completely wrong about the radar coverage gap in the far east. It does not exist, and never did exist. The Russians should have a 12 minute warning even if the missiles are fired right off Chukotka, and they’ve had that same 12 minute warning since forever now. 12 minutes v. 20 minutes makes little real difference.

    The SSBN patrol stuff is highly subjective. We don’t know how patrol figures are calculated by the US Navy or how the Russians define a patrol. Its very likely the kind of short hop missions they undertake simply dont qualify as deterrence patrols in US Navy parlance and arent counted, but the Russians probably view them very differently, and since all we have is US Navy stats on Russian patrols we likely dont have a good picture of Russian navy activity.

    Finally, as missile production goes Votkinsk is being retooled to the tune of several hundred million dollars so all these estimates from 2006 mean less than nothing today. Yars missiles weren’t even talked about in 2006 so dynamics can change very fast and quite unpredictably in this game.

    It is quite entertaining 5 years later to see just how wrong they were predicting Russia would be down to 150 ICBM’s by the end of 2010 when the real number is 375.

    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread #2028745
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    The president of Sevmash gave a rather long press conference/interview this week where he talked rather candidly about the state of the Severodvinsk. ]

    http://russiandefpolicy.wordpress.com/2011/12/06/dyachkovs-interview/

    Final handover to the navy has been pushed back 6 months due to the fact that state acceptance trials of the Kalibr missile system are ongoing and the ship is the only available launch platform for this missile system. There were problems with subsystem suppliers, but much like with the Nerpa those have been sorted out.

    We can look forward to much more predictable delivery times now that the funding picture has been “clarified.”

    Nowhere does he say anything about it being a death trap, sailors being afraid to step foot on the ship or him being at all worried about it. And if the thing sinks this is the guy who gets to spend a decade in Siberia pondering why so his being so unemotional about the whole thing should tell you a lot more than some anonymous poster on a message board.

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 585 total)