dark light

soyuz1917

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 585 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2318602
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    what’s with the black on the wingtips if those arent the LW sensors?

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2318663
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    The laser warning sensors are much smaller and on the wings — same as on the MiG-35.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2318722
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    It says they aim for 8-10% market share in the world helicopter market by 2015. In recent years the helicopter industry has been one of the fastest growing in Russia with production climbing at almost 30% a year, but this is mostly due to the MoD finally paying for new birds and not so much because of any new export success. They need a light helo that actually sells. The Mi-34C might actually get the export orders the Ansat never got….

    in reply to: Russian Civil Aviation #477632
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    The are going to officially announce the stretch version of the SSJ by the end of the month.

    http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2011/05/24/357114/sukhoi-could-unveil-superjet-stretch-in-june.html

    The first prototype composite wing for the MS-21 was delivered today for stress and aerodynamic testing so that program is moving along according to schedule right now.

    The 5 engines per month thing for the SSJ has to be disappointing. Power Jet’s production problems have almost certainly cost them orders.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2319447
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    What aerial reconnaissance did the Russians use over Georgia? How was their ground based Forward-Air-Control – is the Russian army even trained in FAC?

    Recon was done by Tu-22 and some of those tiny drones they have — Luch and Vega models with maybe some Zalas — basically cheap garbage recon.

    FAC is a skill sorely lacking in the Russian military, but it wasnt necessary in Georgia because the Georgians ran the second they got into contact with Russian armor. You could follow the retreating Georgian columns with ease.

    Basically the whole war can be summed up like this — one meeting engagement and one big air attack in which the VVS splattered a half dozen Georgian vehicles and this put the whole Georgian army into a panic and they evaporated thinking an entire brigade had been wiped out.

    The Russians couldnt find anything that needed killing after that.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2319545
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    Again, there is no evidence Buk downed more than 1 aircraft — a high flying Tu-22 that should NEVER have been used as a recon asset in that theater

    All the other kills were almost certainly by MANPAD and only 1 of them can be credited definitevely to Georgia. The other 4-5 kills were likely Russian fired MANPAD’s killing Russian flown aircraft. The lesson the Russians took home is they need a new C4I system so their infantry stops shooting down their own aircraft. The absence of IFF transponders on all those MANPAD’s is criminal.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2319554
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    An Air Force wouldnt do the Georgians any good with 1/3 of their country covered by Russian S-300’s parked safely on Russian territory!

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2319667
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    Well, the RuAF lost 6 or 7 aircraft in the 5 day war with Georgia, out the 500 sorties or so, for the very small amount of damage caused. The coalition over Libya have yet to lose an aircraft. So, one would have to expect a very wide disparity in the quality Libya and Georgia’s AD system to explain it. Otherwise…

    All but 2 of the aircraft were likely downed by friendly fire. MANPAD’s in the hands of Russian soldiers were more deadly to the Russian Air Force than anything the Georgians had. In fact, if anything the lesson from the August war is the Georgians made poor use of their SAM’s, and the Russians negated Buk for the most part by coming in at tree top level — too low for Buk to be of much use.

    The Georgians also had completely modern Israeli Syders in service and they failed to make any use of them at all. They now sit as trophies in Moscow….

    The poor Georgian performance probably had more to do with poor training than poor equipment though. In the hands of more skilled operators their SAM’s would probably have bloodied the Russians a lot worse.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2320659
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    The Algerian MiG-29SMT’s are new and there are 28 or 32 of those. On top of that there are also the 32 or so Su-34’s on order, and they will likely boost that order to 70.

    28-32 MiG-29SMT’s
    60 Su-27SM2/3’s and Su-30MK2’s
    96 Su-35’s
    70 PAK-FA’s
    70 Su-34’s
    16 new Su-25UBT’s on order and that order will likely get bumped to 26.
    However many Su-25’s will get the SM upgrade.

    The MiG-31’s and Su-24’s arent going anywhere for a long time too. They have a lot of MiG-31’s in mothball that have seen very few hours — like half the ones built are sitting mothballed.

    More than an enough.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2322451
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    31 series produced machines delivered. 12 series produced series Ka-52’s have been delivered too so 43 new helos in total in the past few years. Very good numbers considering even Germany only ordered 80 Tigers.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2334767
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    Wait, I thought this was a new build aircraft and not an upgrade to one of the existing 15? Its an upgrade in the sense that its a new variant of the old model, but hard to believe they would spend all that money outfitting airframes that old with all new goodies.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2336459
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    According to this:

    http://www.tvzvezda.ru/news/forces/content/ekipazh_samoleta_a-50_otrabatyvaet_2205.html

    the VVS will be getting a brand new A-50U next month. Can anyone confirm that they’ve started up production of new A-50’s for the VVS?

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2004631
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    No Kh-35’s?

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2005273
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    The Zarya sonar on the 20380’s is a new post-Soviet design, right? It’s seemingly nothing like the monster Zvezda series sonars on the Chabanenko and Neustrashimy. Anyone know whether the Yaroslav Mudry carries a Zvezda-1 or did it get something newer?

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2005697
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    I have to say it, the Gorshkov looks like they’ve done no work on him since launch.

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 585 total)