Find any recent pic of the ship. It has a Nera satcom system with NERA written in big letters on it.
What Russian comms? The Peter the Great has a bloody Norwegian comm system already. They have been installing European communication and navigation systems on Russia warships for a decade now.
the difference is modern computer controlled manufacturing is supposed to cut down on the number of test launches needed. Something is seriously wrong if they need to do the same number of test launches today as they did in the 1970’s.
I personally care less about the airframe than I do the subsystems. JDW is reporting that NIIP will be unveiling their AESA design for the PAK-FA at MAKS….
That alone makes the show well worth attending.
There have been rumors of his being forced out for a few months now. I dont know if you can use his subdued take of the IMDS show to mean anything though. From the pics I’ve seen there was NOTHING at IMDS to get excited about.
Given the well known “trials and tribulations” facing the Lada SSK you really have to wonder just how god awful the electronics loadout on the Borei really is. If they were having such big problems with the BIUS on the Lada and the sonar for a long time was not working right the problems on the Borei are probably exponentially worse so Bulava is probably the least of their worries if the boat is completely deaf and dumb.
Modern liquid fueled missiles are fueled only once and then the fuel is “sealed” in for the operational life of the missile. We know that Russian liquid fueled missiles have shorter shelf lives than their Western solid fueled counterparts, but this was also true of the RS-20 solid fuel missile. Tolerances in Russia have never been what they are in the West. It has nothing to do with liquid v. solid fuel. Absent someone drilling into the missile the thing will not leak for the 10-12 years its rated for. There are sensors in place to spot leaks too. Solid fuels advantages are questionable. The Russians have perfected liquid fueled rockets to such a point where there is little difference. For their part solid fueled rockets are less efficient and slower on boost.
the Enterprise would totally lose to a Star Destroyer as the Star Destroyer would call in the Death Star to save it in a pinch.
What happens if the Flanker goes and gets fitted with a nice R-172 or R-37? It would be a rather quick upgrade to get those missiles flying on the Flanker if there was a legit need and while they are not in the same league as the the planned euro wunder (yes wunder not wonder) missile they may well force the Gripen to turn tail and run before it even gets a shot off or fire off its load from such a distance that the Flanker has time to escape. The russkies arent exactly limited to R-77 and 73’s even today.
they use magnesium for the radar housing because its so light weight right? That should explain why there isnt so much as a trace of the radar….
the best part is it looks like the whole radar just melted away! :dev2:
http://www.russiandefenseblog.org/?p=201
Ukraine looks to Western European yards for new corvette options.
Russia says the Il-78 isnt out of the running just yet. Looks like that article was a bit too premature.
Was Murmansk really scrapped at Zvezdochka? Maybe he is still sitting in the yard and that’s the Oscar 1 they are talking about? Not everything they say they will scrap is actually scrapped, we saw that with Tuman the third Neustrashimy hull that magically reappeared and the same is true of the Kirov hulls that were supposed to be scrapped but are still around rusting.
the article specifies 3 classes they will be upgraded in 2010 and beyond Antei (Oscar 2), Granit (Oscar 1) and Bars (Akula) class submarines.