dark light

soyuz1917

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 391 through 405 (of 585 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread Part II #2033941
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    http://www.russiandefenseblog.org/?p=171

    yep, link to story and a rough translation.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread Part II #2034424
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    wasnt there are redesign done in 2002 after the hull had spent years rusting with no work done to complete it or am I confusing it with the Borei? These pictures may not be accurate anymore given their age is what I’m saying.

    in reply to: Russian ABL flying again? #2502008
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    В настоящее время усилия ОАО “ГСКБ “Алмаз-Антей” направлены на разработку и испытания опытного образца лазерного комплекса авиационного базирования для противодействия в инфракрасной области спектра разведывательным средствам возможного противника на земле, на море, в воздухе и в космосе. Самолет А-60,несущий авиационный лазерный комплекс

    The work currently being done on the A-60 is NOT for the development of an ABL meant to shoot down missiles. The laser is meant to destroy optic sights on enemy ground vehicles, planes, ships and satellites very quickly. The idea is a single A-60 can fly up there and render an entire brigade of armor blind by knocking out every thermal imager in the division or it can blind a satellite. Russian lasers apparently arent powerful enough yet to down a missile from extreme ranges today. That’s the logical next step though, but its years and years away. Right now they are just working on something to blind a potential enemy. They are basically a little further down the line than the US was with the ALL program, but not quite where the US is with ABL today.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread Part II #2034947
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    old news, the accident happened May 4th. They’ve already lifted the helo from the bottom of the ocean and the Yaroslav Mudry has returned to sea trials. The ship should be handed over to the navy in a months time.

    http://www.russiandefenseblog.org/?p=56

    in reply to: Russian ABL flying again? #2503257
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    it would certainly be less profitable than a slow but steady destruction of the enemy. Attrition warfare is better business 🙂

    in reply to: Russian ABL flying again? #2503539
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    http://www.rosrep.ru/news/index.php?ELEMENT_ID=1576&SECTION_ID=17

    here is the link. Talks about Russia not falling into a new arms race, but needing to not fall too far behind. The author is a scientist at Almaz-Antei.

    in reply to: Russian ABL flying again? #2503540
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    It didnt say flight tests, but there was a rather long article on the rosprom.gov.ru site where one of the head engineers talked about the US lead in the field, mentioned the A-60 of old and said work was slow but ongoing on closing the gap with the Americans. I remember translating like a year ago. If I can find it I will post it.

    in reply to: Ka-60, Mi-38, Ansat.. what happened? #2503598
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    Mi-38 will be ready for sale in 2012. The huge delay stems from the lack of a Russian engine until very recently. The Russians were not about to start ordering birds with P&W engines in them.

    http://www.russiandefenseblog.org/?p=16

    Ansats have been delivered to customers in S.Korea and at least one is in service with the Russian navy. I’ve seen pics of it in this orange/redish color. I know I have it somewhere on my old computer. The Ansat is really not a good helicopter for 2009 and wont be competitive internationally. The avionics are primitive and the thing is all metal in the age of composites. Plus, the engine and fuel consumptions are nothing to brag about. Had it come to market 10 years sooner than it did it would have found a few more customers.

    Ka-62 development continues slowly but where the orders will be coming from in anyone’s guess.

    The thing that actually will sell well is the Mi-172 when its finally certified at the end of 2009 or sometime in 2010.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread Part II #2038374
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    werent there also 2 fires on the Lada at peer side? The whole project as a mess, but you have to more or less dismiss this 1st boat as a prototype that will likely be scrapped 5-7 years after induction anyway. What happens with the follow up ships is more important. This whole decade was a loss for the Russian navy anyway. Plus, probably a lot of the electronics on the Lada will simply be scaled up for any future SSN. I’m sure they will recycle a lot of the source code base for sure so better they mess up an SSK than mess up a billion dollar SSN.

    in reply to: Su-34 with regiment emblem #2455036
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    Arms-Tass had a sort of weird Su-34 related story on the 10th of February which kinda hinted that they might have taken delivery of 1 new bird. It was a typical fluff piece about one day the Su-34 replacing the Su-24 so I discounted it as garbage, but now we have a picture of 03….

    in reply to: P-800 Yakhont vs P-900 (supersonic) Klub #1820763
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    multiple Indian sources claim it is a new seeker and not just the old seeker with new programing.

    http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:m4asUe0N4zMJ:www.ddinews.gov.in/National/National%2B-%2BOther%2BStories/ddddqw.htm+brahmos+block+II+new+seeker&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us

    “Officials said the technology in the Block II missiles was “unparalleled” and would help them hit “insignificant targets” hidden in cluster of buildings.

    “The new seeker being developed is unique and would help us to hit our targets which are insignificant in terms of size in a cluster of large buildings. Once developed, we would be the only nation with this advanced technology,” they claimed.”

    in reply to: P-800 Yakhont vs P-900 (supersonic) Klub #1820891
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    the ruble just collapsed so dont expect the cost escalations to remain a problem. Russian manufacturing has just regained a bit of its competitiveness now that the currency it uses is back to a realistic or even a cheap valuation.

    in reply to: P-800 Yakhont vs P-900 (supersonic) Klub #1820937
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    1. There is a new multi-spectrum seeker being tested, hence this failure. They are testing a new seeker so the limitations of the old seeker are entirely irrelevant now. Thank you for bringing up a problem that is no longer a problem. Clearly the developers realized the limitations of the original seeker fairly early on.

    2. I personally dont believe the 300km range number. I dont think the missiles Russia and India will field will be so limited, the export missiles to other nations will likely be so limited, but I doubt the real Brahmos is so limited.

    3. There is a 1,000km version in the works in any event so that “real” cruise missile you want is on its way.

    Brahmost fits its intended roll just fine. Whether the doctrine it was built to fulfill is a good doctrine is guess work until we see a real naval battle somewhere.

    in reply to: P-800 Yakhont vs P-900 (supersonic) Klub #1821378
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    “Why can’t you have the microwaves bounce all over inside the oven?”

    there is another reason for as well, and its the same reason why you dont put anything metal in the microwave, if the waves are allowed to bounce around a lot they will make their way back to the magnetron and they will cook the magnetron!

    in reply to: P-800 Yakhont vs P-900 (supersonic) Klub #1821404
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    microwaves dont in and of themselves generate heat so there is no way that the screen in a microwave is a heat absorbing RAM, whether it is a RAM or not. The heat is generated only when microwaves come into contact with atoms that are sufficiently poorly bonded such that the frequency of the microwave causes them to vibrate. In the case of the microwaves we all know the frequency they emit is optimized for water molecules. These vibrations create heat. Metals, have free moving electrons and are very eager to lose electrons. Microwaves cause metals to emit these electrons and thus you get sparks and crazy effects when you put metals in a microwave. Microwaves typically will not pass through metal and the metal itself will usually not get hot. Certain compounds like ceramics that form complex typically ionic lattices, are highly resistant to such forces too. The lattice structure will resist such vibrations very well. Ceramics are also famed for their very low thermal conductivity even if you ignore the rest of the chemistry. So you can put them in a microwave for a month and they will never get hot. This is why those microwave safe plates dont get hot. So “heat absorbing RAM” is at the minimum some poorly worded “phraseology” when talking about microwaves.

Viewing 15 posts - 391 through 405 (of 585 total)