dark light

soyuz1917

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 585 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: RuAF aviation, news and development thread #2301837
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    Low light TV channel — not thermal, but 90% of the practical capability at 30% the price. Only thing a TI channel let’s you do that this thing can’t is see through smoke and clouds. Plattan is blind in bad weather.

    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread #2019047
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    http://sdelanounas.ru/blogs/17361/

    The Ivan Gren will finally hit the water for the first time on May 18th.

    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread #2020936
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    No, the Russian numbers jive for the most part except for the total number in uniform. The numbers work if you assume they have under 820,000 in uniform. Twower has covered the numbers on his blog better than I can here from memory. The number that is nonsense is the claim they make that its still a million man army. They haven’t had a million men at arms for at least 6-7 years now, but its an open though unacknowledged fact that they are somewhere in the low 800,000 level.

    Nobody is claiming Russia is paying professional soldiers as much as the US is. The pay is about 40% that. But that’s a ridiculous amount of money for a middle income country. It makes officers and the new NCO’s the elites of society again and what it really means is nobody will be piloting a PAK-FA to Beijing for some Yuans because they can’t feed their family in Russia. 12 years ago a Russian Major had to drive a taxi part time off base to keep his family in bread. Today he makes $34k a year which is higher than the median income in the Eurozone (forget Bulgaria — 34k is the median income in France!) and is not going to think about immigrating West where the best he will be able to do is drive a taxi again.

    in reply to: RuAF aviation, news and development thread #2322869
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    The 23mm gun on the new Hinds has less kick than the 30mm gun it replaces so its less of an issue and they can go with a turret. The Apache’s gun has a much higher rate of fire and fires a much smaller 30mm round which also produces less kick. The high rate of fire makes up for the loss in accuracy by giving you more of a shot gun effect, but the shells are not effective against heavy armor. Its a question of compromise.

    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread #2020992
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    Keep in mind there is also supposed to be a housing program for career track people too with the lifetime housing benefit worth a good $80k too. There are plenty of EU armies today with far worse pay and benefits than Russia. Even if the housing program is currently less than ideal with them forcing apartments in less than desirable locales on you, its still free equity. The pension bump is also nothing to sneeze at. Some of these pensions for more senior officers are higher than the max American social security benefit.

    in reply to: RuAF aviation, news and development thread #2323074
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    Simple physics. Torque is force x lever arm. Mount a turret in the front of the helicopter and the recoil generates a greater torque on the airframe kicking the entire helicopter UP and throwing the whole thing off the target. A gun fixed to the middle of the airframe all else equal will exert a lesser torque on the helicopter and thus not kick the entire bird off its target by quite so much.

    One of the biggest reasons crews dont like the Mi-28N is the turreted gun. It is actually NOT a popular feature.

    in reply to: RuAF aviation, news and development thread #2323506
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    Fixed guns are much more accurate than turret installations, and for a cannon with a slow rate of fire like the Gsh-30K you need accuracy to overcome the fact that it will never have the shotgun effect you see with the pee shooter on the Apache. The difference between the 30*113B the Apache fires and the 30*165 the Hind fires is night and day. Apaches use guns to kill dismounts and rip up light vehicles as they cant use them against heavy armor. The Hind is not so limited and can rip up basically every tank out there with its 30mm cannon.

    The only reason they moved over to 23mm’s for the Mi-35M is because the kick of the 30mm was destroying the GOES turrets. The 23mm cannon is inferior.

    in reply to: Russian Civil Aviation #547952
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    http://rosprom.org/news/aviation/aleksandr_inozemtsev_zapusk_pervogo_dvigatelya_demonstratora_pd_14_planiruetsya_osushchestvit_v_iyun/

    First PD-14 engine currently being assembled for the start of bench tests in June. This puts the program almost 3 years to the day behind the Leap-X.

    in reply to: RuAF aviation, news and development thread #2334914
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    Sokol actually cant. The entire production line was packed up and shipped to Irkut. Irkut is actually thinking of expanding the existing production line they inherited to double capacity.

    http://rosprom.org/news/aviation/na_irkutskom_aviazavode_mozhet_byt_sozdana_eshche_odna_liniya_po_sborke_yak_130/

    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread #2023010
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    Worst bit is the dock trials start in May on the Gorshkov, but the planned induction date is sometime in November 2013! This thingy is buggy as all hell if they think they need 18 months for acceptance trials. Watch the induction date be pushed into 2014.

    in reply to: RuAF aviation, news and development thread #2337098
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    Those be the famous AWAC killing K-172’s right? I’m always horrible with missiles — they all look like giant dicks to me.

    in reply to: RuAF aviation, news and development thread #2337102
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    The avionics suite on the SSJ is a collaboration between Russkaya Avionika and Thales. I’m not sure who makes those screens but its probably sourced through Thales (not really sure if Thales even actually makes screens or pulls them off the shelf) as until fairly recently most of Russkaya Avionikas contribution was software. Now on the MS-21 they are working with Rockwell and half the hardware of more is going to be Russian. 20 minutes on Google and I’m sure you can find the answer.

    in reply to: RuAF aviation, news and development thread #2337397
    soyuz1917
    Participant

    Single piece large russian/belarussian touchscreen MFDs were shown at the last MILEX show in Minsk. Russian or American doesn’t matter. All these screens are made in Taiwan 🙂

    soyuz1917
    Participant

    A weather radar which is something you don’t seem to see on Chinese helicopters at all for some reason.

    soyuz1917
    Participant

    Antonov is a KB (a design bureau in Russian parlance). They will survive, and maybe even thrive under the good graces of their principal client the Russian MoD. The question isn’t whether the design house will survive, but what remains of actual manufacturing in Ukraine and the answer is that something like 85% of this manufacturing has already packed up its bags and moved to Russia. The only jewel in the crown left is Motor-Sich and the Kremlin is actively working to gut it too by establishing a helicopter engine building capacity in Russia and ending one of the last major dependencies on Ukraine the Russian’s have. Motor-Sich will not be able to survive on AI-225 sales to China and India alone. They have talked about entering into the fighter engine market with some sort of RD-93 derivative since they own a lot of the same IP as Klimov dating to the Soviet period, but Klimov is simply better funded and they are building a new $1 billion factory for Klimov with French assistance, and nobody will be funding a retooling of Motor-Sich with that kind of money. But Ukraine is screwed all over thanks to the wise leadership of all those Oranges, and aerospace is the least of their problems.

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 585 total)