dark light

LoofahBoy

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 466 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: F-35 and F-22 fly together for the first time #2305957
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    Huh. So that’s how China’s new J-30 was born. :p

    All joking aside, it’s nice to see the two of them side-by-side. Their features complement each other very well.

    I wonder how the two would operate together during a mission? Did they ever get around to updating the F-22s systems so it could link up with the F-35 (or therabouts)?

    in reply to: revival of Yak-141? #2373918
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    Was the Yak-141 even considered to be in the same class capability-wise as the Mig-29? I offhandedly recall it being advertised as matching the maneuverability of the Fulcrum, but there’s really not a whole lot on how well it flew and the numbers really don’t add up much either (Thrust/Weight and wing loading are lacking in comparison). Surely someone else here knows more than I?

    Personally, I always thought it looked like the aftermath of a Mig-25 that tried landing on an aircraft carrier. :p

    in reply to: new Northrop YF-23 website #2319478
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    Your dedication is extraordinarily admirable!!

    in reply to: J-16 Silent Flanker !!! #2360306
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    Well this is out of the blue. First J-20 and now this. Initially I was wondering if the source was just confused with the Naval J-15. Any chance those two programs could overlap?

    in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 3 #2323529
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/attachment.php?attachmentid=191610&stc=1&thumb=1&d=1294742724

    Is anyone else getting a Viggen vibe here?

    in reply to: J12 ? Is this for real or smoke and mirrors? #2407843
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    There were a number of images that popped up a while back from some Chinese demo something-or-other about future aircraft design. The one thing in common that all of the 3D models shown was that they all held a resemblance to the Mig 1.44 Demonstrator of some sort.

    in reply to: Defending Mother Russia #2426813
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    Very nice, although I have nitpicks:

    1) You state the Su-35BM does not have thrust vectoring; I was under the impression that it does.

    2) The Siberian Air Defense gap is notable (not to mention allowing easy access to russian airspace through the pole, but is there anything of strategic value to the Russian Military located in northern Siberian anyway?

    The PAK FA/F-22 Analysis gets the gold, though; very well done, and more importantly, unbiased.

    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    Honestly, is anyone surprised at this point?

    in reply to: PAK-FA NATO code name #2399760
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    Firefox.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode X #2402217
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    * The PAK FA can carry either eight next-generation air-to-air R-77 missiles, or two large controllable anti-ship bombs weighing 1,500 kg each.

    * The new jet can also carry two long-range missiles developed by the Novator Bureau which can hit targets within a 400 kilometer range.

    Oy! Starting to get a picture of it’s payload.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode X #2402260
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    Hej guys! Putin says will be in service by 2013! I’m sh*ting you not!

    Only to have it be pushed back another year, and another year, and then another… 😀

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode X #2403358
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    Now that it has flown i hope he comes back with some precious infos…
    Rsm55 where are uuu?

    He’s probably fifty feet somewhere under a Russian lake with a set of concrete shoes right now. http://www.cheesebuerger.de/images/smilie/frech/d035.gif

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode X #2403405
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    Thank you Quad. First clear shot of the weapons bay we have:

    http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/4300/ohsnap9.jpg

    Intensity of requests of the image has exceeded an admissible limit. The image is temporarily disabled.

    I think we just broke QuadroFX’s website. 🙂

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode X #2403414
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/8826/ohsnap4.jpg

    Another screen captcha for your speculating needs. I love the color in this one.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode X #2403421
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    Actually, if you look across to the other side, you can see the Landing gear doesn’t retract inside of them, on the high res pictures. I have a feeling those are the close range missile, missile bays/housings. 😉

    I don’t know, they look awfully small for that, and even if they did they’d only hold one missile and that’s quite an RCS disruption for just a single lousy missile. On second glance they do look fused to the wing so I’m going with the AESA radar on this one.

    One thing’s for sure; the way it’s engine nacelles are deliberately placed far apart ergo it’s “squished” appearance, that thing must have one big weapons bay. You could easily fit two people in there; a handy way to bring a few mechanics on long flights. :p

    You know, given how small those vertical tails are, I could easily see them removing them all together for the next upgrade and having the thrust vectoring take full control of yaw.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 466 total)