dark light

LoofahBoy

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 466 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: General Discussion #319072
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    I dont see why the american forces need such noisy invasions; dont they have special forces for this kind of thing? You know, the world would have never known they were there?

    in reply to: Pakistani military ordered to attack Americans #1900025
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    I dont see why the american forces need such noisy invasions; dont they have special forces for this kind of thing? You know, the world would have never known they were there?

    in reply to: F-18 Hornet #2474538
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    …are going to end up working in a gas station with a coke addiction after their glory days of highschool (the 2000-2025s) are over. The Super Hornet, on the other hand, will have settled down with a nice retirement package having survived a rough but ultimately successful career as a fighter jet. 😮

    in reply to: Flankers beats F-35 in highly classified simulated dogfight ? #2475299
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    That whole “6th Generation” business by Boeing; Boeing’s advertising is so hilarious they might as well just send spam mail to everyone’s emails.

    I sincerely doubt Boeing even has a clue what a “6th Generation Aircraft” means when the 5th generation just came out.

    in reply to: Flankers beats F-35 in highly classified simulated dogfight ? #2475475
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    Hell, Australia should just buy Flankers themselves. :diablo:

    in reply to: JSF: The Latest Hotspot in the U.S. Defense Meltdown #2475476
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    Just out curiosity, how many gun rounds are used in an average shot? 10? 50? I’d think the number of gun kills for any modern warplane would be quite limited as they just don’t carry that many rounds nowadays.

    Each spray generally lasts about 2 seconds from what I remember. For the F-22’s M61A2 a 6600 rounds a minute, that’s 220 rounds a burst. The F-22 carries 480 rounds, so technically speaking, the Gun will give you two more kills.

    Technically speaking, of course. I’m sure a hot **** pilot with good aim could get more with it, but then he’d probably just end up getting shot down himself somewhere along the way…

    So the F-22 Raptor has the theoretical maximum kill count of 11 aircraft for a single sortie. 8 from missiles, two from the gun, and one from ramming the enemy kamikaze style. :diablo:

    in reply to: JSF: The Latest Hotspot in the U.S. Defense Meltdown #2475556
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    We do?

    Whats the F-22 gonna do when it runs out of missiles, close in for gun kills on the hapless Su-30s?

    I think they call that “Sarcasm” Nick… 😮

    in reply to: PLAAF News, Photos and Speculation #12 #2475880
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    Bah; the JH-7 looks so ’80s. And I’m no fan of retro.

    in reply to: JSF: The Latest Hotspot in the U.S. Defense Meltdown #2475961
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    All in all, organizational inertia has a powerful way of creeping up and whacking everyone.

    Cant they use simulators for that type of thing now? Big, multiplayer simulators pitting the two forces together with realistic flight profiles and settings without those ROEs and such?

    I mean, hell, if XBox live can do it… :diablo:

    in reply to: AWACS invaluable asset or sitting duck? #2477660
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    At any rate, is there any projected replacement for the USAF E-3s in the long run?

    Or at least an upgrade? I think I read an article a while back about F-22s during the excersize, and how the F-22s had a better picture of what’s going on than the supporting AWACS did. I think, anyway…

    Maybe a stealthy, AESA-toting AWACS? :confused:

    in reply to: Iraq looking to buy F-16's??? #2477661
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    Give them a chance to buy Americanized Gripens instead. We don’t need a government that is not particularly trustworthy at this stage owning such an air force in such proximity to Israel.

    Americanized? Aren’t the C/D Gripens already standardized for NATO integration or something like that? :confused:

    in reply to: The best aircraft to chase UFO #2478245
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    But I am not talking about what is comprehensive to us. A civilization that defies our known laws of physics would make light work of earth based defenses, or even looking at us right now. We simply cannot comprehend their science or even their existence…

    The answer simple: the curiously humanoid aliens travel through the universe through a systematic ring of plot holes placed throughout the universe (and the story). 😀

    The master aliens in turn, play their war against us like a kid playing Starcraft in his computer.

    Are you saying that the invading alien forces are South Koreans!? http://www.cheesebuerger.de/images/smilie/konfus/a090.gif

    in reply to: Physics question about fighter jets? #2478284
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    The same way as if the plane weighed less.

    Exactly the answer I needed. Thanks everyone. 🙂

    And seriously Greg, read moar science fiction. You need to nerdify! 😀

    in reply to: Super-Hornet in the IAF as MRCA #2478286
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    Indeed! Terrible waste of bandwidth and …what an utter bore. Death to topics devoted to the MRCA!! 😎

    At least they’re not as bad as Tomcat vs Superhornet threads… 😮

    in reply to: Physics question about fighter jets? #2478328
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    If it’s reducing the inertia of the whole plane, it would directly improve the performance of the aircraft.

    In which way, exactly? Thats the question I’m trying to ask.

    An impossible technology question, will get you an impossible answer.
    There is absolutely no logical challenge in answering this type of questions, so there is absolutely no point in making them

    You need to read more science fiction my friend. 😉

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 466 total)