dark light

LoofahBoy

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 466 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode X #2403989
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    Actually, the visibility rearward looks excellent to me. It isn’t like the pilot can see through the ejection seat. Besides, if they end up with a system like the F-35 has, it won’t matter.

    In that regard, it’s looks pretty comparable to the F-35. And besides, I have no doubt this thing has a serious sensor package if the reports are to go by.

    YES WE DID!!!!!!! YES WE DID!!!!!!!!…….YOU ABSOLUTELY BEAUTIFUL BAAAAAAAADAAAAAAAAASSSS-MOTHAUKAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    ………BYE-BYE F-35…..(0.5m^2- DON’T MAKE MY SLIPPERS LAUGH!!!!!!)

    Are we gonna have to put you back on the tranquilizers for the day, Otaku? :p

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode X #2404005
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    What we need is a top view to get a real good idea of the shape.

    Given the small size of those vert. stabilizers, you don’t suppose it supplements it’s yaw movement with thrust vectoring?

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode X #2404065
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    It almost looks as if there is a DSI ridge inside that intake.

    /first speculation :diablo:

    EDIT: There is currently over 200 viewers watching this thread. Wow.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode X #2404081
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    From the inlet design, I wonder where the Internal weapons bay is going to be?

    The general idea is that it runs lengthways between the engine nacelles not unlike the F-14, only internal.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode X #2404087
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    Quit pretending like F-22 look-a-like intakes, exhaust, or anything else is the only way that works. Thousands of engineers worked on this multi-billion $$ project. They know better. 😎

    Oh, and this is only the beginning.

    I called it, the very first pictures would have someone calling it an F-22 ripoff within five minutes! I called it!!! 😮

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode X #2404126
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    I think we collectively owe Paralay a beer. He was right all along.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode X #2417408
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    You mean QuadroFX…!! Link-1, Link-2

    Not QuantumFX 😡

    Good lord, how did this happen here? QuantumFX, QuadroFX, who’s copying whom?

    in reply to: Guess the NATO reporting name for PAK-FA ? #2426384
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    “Foreskin.” 🙂

    in reply to: Boeing displays manned F/A-XX concept jet #2436094
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    Boeing does it again. :rolleyes:

    “Sixth Generation” my ass. I just love Boeing’s advertising. I would like for them to actually, you know, define the term “Sixth Generation” instead of just using it as a promotion buzz word. For real results, they should just go ahead and call it a tenth generation fighter jet…

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode VIII #2438686
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    QuadroFX, time to change your avatar to Yoda! 😀

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode VIII #2441004
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    UAC CEO Alexey Fyodorov, former head of the Irkut manufacturing plant, has confirmed on numerous occasions that there are ambitions to develop a light fighter complement to the PAK FA. The priority for the moment, however, is the PAK FA.

    Theres always been talk of a lightweight 5G fulcrum successor, but this is the first I’ve heard of them seriously considering it by any means. Do they even have the money to support two 5G programs at this point? :confused:

    Any word if it will be MiG?

    U.S. Air Force Lt. Gen. Daniel J. Darnell, deputy chief of staff for air, space and information operations, suggests that the Su-35 is “equal or superior” to the F-15.

    :diablo:

    in reply to: F-22 can Super Cruise for only 100 Nautical Miles #2441843
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    I bet SS-26 doesn’t even make it to 100 posts.

    in reply to: EADS advanced UAV finally gets a name. #2443377
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    What the hell is a “Talarion”? :confused:

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode VIII #2443379
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    Curses; all I want to see is one official picture. Just one. At least give us something to chew on the for the next five years while you make us wait, Sukhoi!

    in reply to: Does latest Su-35 with TVC but no canard proves… #2451483
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    It shows that any advantages that extra control surfaces and/or Thrust Vectoring provide can now be emulated by relaxed stability FBW.

    Some time ago they modified the flight software to the TVCless Su-35. At an airshow, the Su-35 emulated the maneuvers of the Thrust-Vectored Su-37 perfectly, without thrust vectoring.

    That and they decided to remove the canards to improve it’s stealth signature. That being said, the canards are still offered as an export option.

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 466 total)