dark light

LoofahBoy

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 436 through 450 (of 466 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Super Hornet buy to be reconsidered. #2494111
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    This is true because of how USAF set up the systems (radar, Fire control, etc.). The new F-15Ks and SGs reportedly will have the full F-15 fighter capability restored. In fact, because of shortages in the number of F-15s available in the future, there are plans in USAF to make the necessary software and computing changes to its F-15Es to put all the fighter capability back. And if the proposed new F-15E order materializes, they will have full fighter capability from the start.

    :confused:

    Off topic here, but thats a new one on me. I was always under the impression that the F-15E had all the A2A capability of the F-15C all along. Do you have more info about that?

    in reply to: the PAK-FA saga, continued2…… #2494261
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    Hey! you evil Yanks! “say hello to my little friend”

    [ATTACH]160743[/ATTACH]

    It kinda looks like a Raptor with a heaping dose of Russian Bodybuilding and vitamins. When they roll out the prototype, it wouldn’t surprise me if the jet itself somehow speaks “I must break you.”

    http://sayhey.files.wordpress.com/2007/05/ivan-drago_cr.jpg

    in reply to: Another new Iranian F-5 variant. #2494384
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    Doesn’t Matej frequent this forum as well? We might as well ask him if we could. I PMed him asking for the image; hopefully he’ll put it back up.

    in reply to: the PAK-FA saga, continued2…… #2494952
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    🙂

    Interesting arrangement. If that turns out to be true, then it could be problematic with the armament slung vertically like that. Should any missile below the upper row get stuck in the bay for whatever reason, it could prevent the launch of the others above.

    in reply to: Su-35 first flight #2495024
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    but I guess the air force has almost totally dropped the desire for 150 MiG-29SMTs?

    From what I’ve heard, the RuAF plans to get rid of the ’29 altogether. I dont have a source, but thats the rumor…

    in reply to: India offered Kitty Hawk free if… #2495317
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    CV-59 – Forrestal – to be sunk
    CV-61 – Ranger – to be sunk or made a museum
    CV-62 – Independence – to be sunk
    CV-66 – America – sunk

    Not to veer off topic here, but why oh why would they waste all that precious metal? 😮

    BTW, does India plan to field more than one carrier at all in the future?

    in reply to: Another new Iranian F-5 variant. #2495468
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    Still there for me.:confused:

    Grr… 😡 it’s not showing up either in Firefox OR IE for me. It just has Matej’s text and thats it. Anyone else have the picture?

    Wait, are we talking about the same thing here? :confused:

    in reply to: Another new Iranian F-5 variant. #2495780
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    The image seems to have dissapeared…

    in reply to: B-2 Crashes in Guam #2496659
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    This is the first time a B-2 has ever been lost. This could get interesting.

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon news II #2496706
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    Wouldn’t the capabilities of the Typhoon be too similar to the Su-30MKI already in service?

    in reply to: Su-35 first flight #2496776
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    Very interesting, at least in terms of combat aircraft I see few other alternatives than the Su-35, I wonder if the figure includes transport, support and other aircraft though?:confused:

    Cant forget their PAK FA project. If I’m not mistaken the Su-35 is supposed to be a sort of stop-gap before the PAK FA enters service.

    Correct me if I’m wrong.

    in reply to: Su-35 first flight #2497055
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    Is the Su-33 ever going to get a upgrade? Maybe with some of the features of the Su-35?

    I think they were going to a while back? :confused: Think it was more in league with the old Su-35. Now it seems like Russia has pretty much given up on the Su-33, though.

    A navalized Su-35 would be nice too.

    BTW, a little off topic but do Su-33’s have AA-12/R-77 capability?

    in reply to: MIG-29SMT #2497577
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    bang for their ruble

    Uh… rip for their ruble? No, revenue for their ruble, thats it! D’oh!

    …anyway, from what I understand, they plan to retire the ’29 outright once the PAK FA goes into service. Wonder if they can actually afford to pull that off.

    Correct me if I’m wrong.

    in reply to: The Mitsubishi ATD-X. Hmm… #2497578
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    This is a tad off topic, but does anyone know how long the JASDF plans to keep thier F-15Js in service?

    By the way, very informative post Dork Matter.

    in reply to: Two F-15s down over Gulf of Mexico #2497580
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    According to Fox, one of the pilots is dead. The article kinda contradicts itself though… http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,331558,00.html

    IF its true, my heart goes out to him and his family.

Viewing 15 posts - 436 through 450 (of 466 total)