dark light

CayceG

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 158 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: UGLIEST PLANES?!?! #2503662
    CayceG
    Participant

    You guys are giving the Yak-38 a hard time. The -38 didn’t deserve it, but the two seat -38MU did 😀

    I second the vote for the X-32, but in keeping with the VTOL hate I think I’m going to vote for the Harrier.
    I just do not like the look of it and any other jet with wingspans less than half of its width… But the Harrier just looks like it’s got weird bumps all over it. The contours aren’t smooth at all like the Yak-38.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News from around the world – II #2504096
    CayceG
    Participant

    Israel is really gearing up for this Iran thing… trial flights to Greece and Spain, MiG-29 dogfights in heavy load configurations… They’re really preparing for the real deal.

    I have a very bad feeling about this.

    CayceG
    Participant

    I don’t know what you’ve read, but the Russian

    Besides, there even are strong indications that the first batch of the 35BM will go either to Zernograd or to Millerovo (as part of the 4th command “new” airbase)

    Just a question, what clues are there that would suggest this is the case?

    Not trying to be contentious… I’d just like to know why certain fighters go to certain bases.

    in reply to: Sukhois better than F15s and 16s #2459259
    CayceG
    Participant

    Do you have the real amount of 1991 desert storm operation’s Iraq and USA lost aircrafts?
    And how was the performance of the Iraq mig-29’s in the war?

    Here’s ACIG’s database of US air to air victories in Desert Storm:

    http://s188567700.online.de/CMS/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=38&Itemid=47

    I can’t comment on the Iraqi MiG-29 performance though.

    in reply to: This is surprising. 70% of RuAF MiG-29s unable to fly #2460235
    CayceG
    Participant

    They saw it that way because many of them are completely utterly and hopelessly wrapped up in Obama, others because they don’t want to admit a percieved Russian weakness.

    Everything is pointing to a political solution. Can you prove that the Iskanders were nixed because of funding?

    in reply to: This is surprising. 70% of RuAF MiG-29s unable to fly #2460608
    CayceG
    Participant

    Well, you have to think about the smaller threats. The Autumn War in Georgia proved that smaller conflicts don’t usually cause for nukes. In those cases, air support and air superiority are sorely needed. Especially when Russia gets sucked in to conflicts in the near-abroad. In these cases, upgraded MiG-29s could perform short range air patrols and air support missions.

    But these areas aren’t in huge supply. Volatile border regions are about the only places where I could think a MiG-29 would be useful. It’s sort of a ‘first responder’, but in the case of airspace penetration, that role definitely deserves to go to the Su-27. It is the better interceptor/fighter.

    in reply to: This is surprising. 70% of RuAF MiG-29s unable to fly #2460617
    CayceG
    Participant

    Pretty much the same fault for the F-15’s. The tail.

    Maybe they should remove the faulty tails and modernize them into a mig-35 alike.

    It is an option, but I’m not sure that it is the best option. Keeping a small number of upgraded MiGs would be good for close-to-home, fast response engagements. They could be deployed at bases along Russia’s borders and fulfill their role well. However, they don’t perform as well in the interceptor/fighter role as the Su-27. When it comes to air defense, the Su-27 looks like Russia’s best bet.

    Having a lower cost, lighter fighter like the MiG-29 is needed to an extent, but not in the current numbers.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode VII #2480833
    CayceG
    Participant

    The first in Russia to test sea range aircraft to be located on the Black Sea – Ivanov

    The first in Russia to test sea range aircraft to be located on the Black Sea.The opinion was expressed by Vice Prime Minister Sergei Ivanov.

    “I believe that only the most suitable place could be the Black Sea – waters adjacent to the Krasnodar Krai”, – he said.Ivanov explained that the site is necessary today to test the first fifth-generation combat aircraft, which will start this year.”As the aircraft armament works and sea targets, we need to create a new site, – explained the vice-premier. – This site so far in Russia. “At the meeting of the Military Industrialization Commission of the Government of the Russian Federation on January 21 decided that the company” Sukhoi “and the Ministry of Defense in the first quarter will present a coherent plan for preliminary tests, and after a few months – the plan for flight testing” – he said.

    Ivanov said that could not yet say exactly where it will be the Marine ground. According to him, this will be the decision of the Ministry of Defense. However, according to Ivanov, the Black Sea – the only right place for him. “Naturally, we will not build it on the coast of Ukraine”, – stressed Ivanov. Currently, on the Crimean coast is the only Marine ground for such tests, created in Soviet times.

    date:22.01.2209
    source:http://www.aviaport.ru

    Veeery interesting!

    So a missile testing range is being planned for the Russian coast on the Black Sea that will be host to the PAK-FA? To me this seems like a sort of saber rattling on Russia’s part to scare Ukraine.

    in reply to: what countries actually need and dont need carriers? #2049766
    CayceG
    Participant

    Personally, I don’t see the need for the US to have 11 carriers. I’ve been against such a huge navy for a while and can’t see the need for more than 8 or 9 carriers–which in comparisson to other navies, still seems like complete overkill.

    in reply to: Black Sea Fleet's capability to hit onshore targets #2052409
    CayceG
    Participant

    So no known capability then… Thank you guys.

    in reply to: Black Sea Fleet's capability to hit onshore targets #2052510
    CayceG
    Participant

    I see that I’ve had quite a few views on the topic. I don’t mean to double post, but I would like to know if any of you people that have seen this topic knows anything about the capability.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode V #2489863
    CayceG
    Participant

    http://i33.tinypic.com/mszqxz.jpg

    This looks promising, someone has to have the details of this video that Saturn showed in China.

    That almost looks like it has F-15 intakes… That doesn’t seem to be the most stealthy design if it resembles F-15 intakes from the front. And the wings look exactly like F-15 wings. Same with the engine nozzles. They look like F100s rather than AL-31s or -41s.

    I’m highly skeptical of the effectiveness of that design when it comes to the stealth properties that Sukhoi is promising.

    in reply to: JSF: The Latest Hotspot in the U.S. Defense Meltdown #2476886
    CayceG
    Participant

    Hmm… I think this is just another one of Sprey’s hissy fits about not getting his way.

    I’ll agree with him about the F-35 not being able to perform CAS duties very well, but everything else he’s talking about is kinda ridiculous.

    in reply to: New fighter for Georgia #2490778
    CayceG
    Participant

    Well, Georgia has the Su-25 industry capabilities and also has ties to Israel…

    Since the Su-25 has capabilities to hold a small number of heat-seeking AAMs, why not get some help in ‘upgrading’ the Scorpions to hold more types of AAMs? I don’t see Georgia needing to buy a whole new type of fighter when it’s accustomed to dealing with one type. Especially since another fighter might mean even more strained relations with Russia.

    Other than that, I agree with improved air defense systems. That would really bolster their defense capabilities more just because it takes less resources to do that than training pilots in air to air combat in a totally new jet. Plus the economy is going to be strained in the near future. This would ultimately be much cheaper.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode IV #2492442
    CayceG
    Participant

    -This video in fact has an EXACT copy of the PAK-FA cockpit.

    -The PAK-FA will feature an advanced autopilot program that can perform pinpoint combat operations and perform evasive manuevers. The AI will also restrict pilot manuevers if they are too dangerous (video refers to the Paris air show crash, and says the AI would have prevented that) – and similar computer systems are found on the MiG-35!

    Actually, that cockpit looks like the Su-35BM cockpit. This seems like the same footage we’ve seen before when the Su-35 simulator was shown (before the airplane made its flights).

    As for that AI stuff, that sounds pretty cool. I assume it would have to be turned off if one wanted to pull a Cobra or Kulbit though 😀

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 158 total)