is this it ? 😮
Nope. It’s nothing but a mirrored image of a previous drawing with some PhotoShopped landing gear put in front of a desk background.

Old Sukhoi T-4 Sotka. A Soviet analogue to the American XB-70 that, like the XB-70 never got past testing.
Does anyone know the status of females in the Russian air force? Are they allowed to be pilots?
Any information will be helpful.
As fascinating and thrilling as it would be to hear of the Berkut and Super Flanker sparring in the skies over Zhukovsky, I doubt it’s true.
Though the addition of a different IRST system (as it seems) lends faith to the fact that the Su-47 was used for more than a weapons bay testbed.
The big missile in the centerline looks to be an R-37 or a variant thereof.
Of course it’s biased. The F-35 missile dodge was absurd.
It was a disappointing end to a great series.
How about ‘spreading’ democracy? Because I seem to remember hearing that phrase a lot.
Wasn’t the plan supposed to include land based versions of the SM-3 anyway? What’s this about tying up Aegis ships?
sferrin: learn what tit for tat is.
This is what the change in policy brings:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/8271990.stm
Plus, the new proposal (SM-3s and a radar in Turkey) provides a more proven technology that is less politically volatile and is more effective.
Something tells me you would be one of the people pushing for an invasion of Cuba over talking with the Soviets during the Missile Crisis.
German Eurofighters intercept Russian transport, surveillance aircraft
The German air force has had a busy opening three weeks to its first NATO deployment involving the Eurofighter combat aircraft, with so-called “Alpha” scrambles having been launched to intercept Russian air force transport and surveillance assets.
Two aircraft from the Luftwaffe’s Fighter Wing 74 (FW74) were first launched from Lithuania’s Siauliai air base soon after assuming the air policing mission for NATO members Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania on 1 September.
Eurofighter partner company Alenia Aeronautica says the pair took off within 6min of receiving an order to intercept a contact in international airspace over the Baltic Sea which turned out to be a Russian Antonov An-72 transport. The fighters were alongside it within a further 9min. “The An-72 remained in the area for over 50min, always closely monitored,” the company says.
The Luftwaffe says a second intercept was performed on 15 September, after another aircraft “flew very close past the border of the Baltic airspace”. Its Eurofighters flew close to a Russian air force Ilyushin Il-76-based A-50 airborne early warning and control aircraft, prompting two accompanying Sukhoi Su-27 fighters to break away from the surveillance aircraft. These were subsequently intercepted by Finnish air force fighters.
Ordinarily based at Neuburg-Donau in southern Germany, FW74 will maintain its detachment of Eurofighters in Lithuania until 1 November, when they will hand over responsibilities to German air force McDonnell Douglas F-4F Phantoms for another two months.
Germany’s Eurofighters are armed with Diehl BGT Defence IRIS-T short-range air-to-air missiles and a 27mm Mauser cannon for the air policing mission.
My question is, why did the Su-27s break away from the AWACS when the Eurofighters intercepted the flight?
You really don’t hear much about AWACS intercepts with fighter escorts. This is kindof an exciting development.
Nearly half of Russian air-to-air missiles with IAF have homing, ageing problems: CAG report
Putting a big question mark on the performance of the Russian beyond visual range (BVR) air-to-air missiles with the Indian Air Force, an audit report by the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) has noted that nearly half the missiles tested either did not home in on targets during evaluations or failed ground tests because they were ageing much before their shelf lives.
The R 77 (RVV-AE) BVR missiles, fitted on board the Su-30 MKIs, MiG-29s and MiG-21 Bisons, were bought from Russia starting 1996. More than 2,000 missiles were ordered after the Kargil conflict and 1,000 have been delivered.
The CAG report, which will be released soon, is based on evaluations of the missile — its range is close to 90 km — during ground tests, inspections and test firing by the IAF. The missiles were bought at a “cost of Rs 2 crore each” but their failure during tests, says the CAG report, has affected the “operational preparedness” of the IAF.
“All figures in the report are based on air force records. Everything is verified by the IAF,” an official said.
The problem with the missiles was referred to Russia and several teams subsequently visited India to rectify faults. IAF officers familiar with the missiles confirmed that this has been a problem area for long. “It is a known fact that the missiles do not work as we would like them to. Periodic tests that are carried out when they are in storage show their dismal state. We also have problems with spare parts,” said a retired officer who was closely associated with the matter.
This begs the question… Does this mean that the RuAF missile stocks are in the same shape (or worse) or is it just because these are export variants?
Anybody can explain me a word meaning “raptorski”?
It’s an American way of saying that the PAK FA is going to be nothing but an F-22 clone.
It’s taking the “Raptor” designation of the F-22 and adding a common Russian syllable on the end to make the Raptor sound ‘more Russian’.
Just a little way for F-22 fanboys to talk bad of the PAK FA :p
Yes, the Su-35 lacks the air brake on all other Flanker variants.
I think we need a confirmation as to exactly what the ratio is in the original source.
I think it just means 1 Gripen lost for every 6 Flankers downed.
That’s my interpretation.
Impressive numbers, nevertheless. The Gripen NG is quickly becoming my favorite Euro-canard. And if I were in charge of upgrading Eastern European air forces, I’d have a hi-lo mix with the Gripen NG as my choice for the Lo portion, with the -35BM rounding out the top.