dark light

RayR

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 346 through 360 (of 1,560 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Indian AF News and Discussion Part 16. #2347602
    RayR
    Participant

    American-built aircraft is understood to have emerged tops in technical and flight evaluations of India’s effort to procure primary trainer aircraft. I hear that the Hawker Beechcraft T-6C Texan-II (in IAF colours above) is on top of the list of five basic trainer aircraft that were put through field trials during October-December last year as part of the Indian Air Force’s competition for 181 (75+106) aircraft.

    From Livefist.

    in reply to: MMRCA News and Discussion 8 #2348393
    RayR
    Participant

    Originally Posted by Clinton advisor Ashley Tellis
    “India has settled for a plane, not a relationship.

    ”Priceless

    No thanks.You can sell your planes to your major non nato ally to hunt al qaeda. IAF gnats and mysteres have downed sabres and starfighters and will do it again.:rolleyes:

    in reply to: J-15 for Russia? #2348447
    RayR
    Participant

    The country;s links go beyond military. Severing relations over a Su-27 copy is not worth it. One would hope consequences were introduced indirectly though…

    I dont think the almost exact similarity (atleast externally) can be done without original documents or blueprints.Most probably they have been sourced through either of these means …

    1.Industrial espionage – It has been said that chinese industrial espionage system is the most effective in the world currently..
    http://overwatchreport.com/issue/the-overwatch-report-april-2011/article/chinese-industrial-espionage

    2.The chinese hire lot of ex – mig/sukhoi engineers with lucrative salaries and make them work for chinese aircraft manufacturers.

    3.When Russia was down at the economic front during the 90s , the chinese might have bought the documents directly from Russia.The fact that Russia continue to do roaring business supplying engines , radars etc for those “pirated” copies may show that the chinese may have russian authorisation at some level.

    in reply to: J-15 for Russia? #2348454
    RayR
    Participant

    say if I want to design and produce my own line of smart phones, it doesn’t need
    high-end Intel and AMD chips. What are the major components? 1. A low-power
    chip possibly ARM or MIPS architecture, 2. a power efficient LCD screen, 3. flash
    memory, ….

    Why should I set up the manufacturing myself when theres thousands of OEMs in
    China that can put it together for me? I just design the software interface and the
    hardware specs, and let them do the rest.

    Thats different.I dont think that was what QB was saying.He said assembling american products. The “american” products might be built by chinese companies but designed by the US companies and built acc. to the specs supplied.

    Anyway OT.

    in reply to: J-15 for Russia? #2348536
    RayR
    Participant

    They are OEM manufacturers, sometimes its not cost efficient for the companies to
    manufacture every component themselves.

    for example?

    in reply to: J-15 for Russia? #2348581
    RayR
    Participant

    I say why not. They assemble American products (computers and electronics) and sell it to Americans.

    Incorrect.Its the american companies who assemble american products in american factories located on chinese soil and sell it to americans.

    in reply to: J-15 for Russia? #2348585
    RayR
    Participant

    TChina went ahead and made their own line on its own.. and likely have created a version with updated avionics.

    “Updated” is a relative term.

    in reply to: Indian AF News and Discussion Part 16. #2349096
    RayR
    Participant

    I think the white strips on the tejas are not paint peeling of.They are very small sensors attached to the surfaces with special adhesive tape.The advantage of these sensors are that they can be easily put on structures made of composite as drilling holes through them damages the composite [which can be done in metal surfaces].They also dont produce any aerodynamic hindrance.

    in reply to: General Discussion #332860
    RayR
    Participant

    Enough.Waiting for US-Pakistan lovefest to restart any-day now….http://i427.photobucket.com/albums/pp352/ClansOfCourage/Clans%20Of%20Courage%20Smilies/InnocentWhistle.gif

    in reply to: Osama bin Laden is Dead (Merged) #1867646
    RayR
    Participant

    Enough.Waiting for US-Pakistan lovefest to restart any-day now….http://i427.photobucket.com/albums/pp352/ClansOfCourage/Clans%20Of%20Courage%20Smilies/InnocentWhistle.gif

    in reply to: Chinese Version of E-2 #2349745
    RayR
    Participant

    That was another one:cool:

    I wasnt talking about the one in Wuhan..there were comments about this very one.;)

    in reply to: Chinese Version of E-2 #2349802
    RayR
    Participant

    I cant help but LOL when I remember that at first when these pictures appeared on the net some chinese posters vehemently claimed it was built as a mockup for practising carrier landings and crew training!:D

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -III #2004662
    RayR
    Participant
    in reply to: Eurocanards vs J-20 and J-10B #2350566
    RayR
    Participant

    yep. +1 with scorpion82.

    various people 😉 will start to claim the world even if they know almost nothing about them and it will turn into a huge slugfest.

    Rafale vs typhoon between two sets of well informed posters welcome anyday rather than these fanboys…

    in reply to: MMRCA News and Discussion 8 #2351485
    RayR
    Participant

    I cannot believe you useless worthless good for nothings attending airshow after airshow with vip passes and all , didnt ever think of carrying an inch tape and measuring the nose diameter to put an end to this back and forth debate based on highly accurate tangential extrapolatory differential geometric photographic evidence 😀

Viewing 15 posts - 346 through 360 (of 1,560 total)