dark light

RayR

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,156 through 1,170 (of 1,560 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Malabar 07 :Carriers sunk #2048161
    RayR
    Participant

    [Being cleverish ish ish] Since when Does the IN operate MKI’s with brahmos ? [/Being cleverish ish ish]

    There has been some talk and also some sightings[separate pilot uniforms et al] of MKIs in the maritime role.The air-launched Brahmos isnt ready now,but will be in the immediate future.

    in reply to: IAF news-discussion July-September 2007 #2513929
    RayR
    Participant

    The only problem is the Tejas have yet to enter Squadron Service in any numbers. As a matter of fact it has not entered Squadron Service at all. Further, the MMRCA will likely be many years away whatever type is selected? So, in the short-term India has a real problems on its hands. As it is way under strength and will get much worse before it get better………..:(

    Sorry, but the picture is far from rosy!:eek:

    Dude I think you have made your point..I dunno..about a couple of hundred times now.:p So chill.:) The Indians here would also like to see it in service ASAP.

    in reply to: IAF news-discussion July-September 2007 #2513933
    RayR
    Participant

    It could be a scan form a fim camera , another reason could be that it could be shot with a mediocre camera using very high ISO settings thereby getting higher noise then we expect , couple that with a dirty canopy of the chaser and we could get a pic like that . I have seen such grainy pics at USAF website aswell and it gets grainer at high res with more detail .

    P.s- it could also be a video capture but i doubt it .

    Right said.I would think its the former.Thx.

    in reply to: Malabar 07 :Carriers sunk #2048168
    RayR
    Participant

    Ouch. But then how much scarier could that be than AS-4 armed Backfires and Oscars with Shipwrecks- which is what the Aegis system was designed to handle?

    Its all a cat and mouse game.A salvo of Brahmos/sizzlers coming at you is going to be nightmare scenario for any captain I think.

    in reply to: Malabar 07 :Carriers sunk #2048176
    RayR
    Participant

    Well in a unidimensional way , yes . A carrier by definition is a sitting target so its not that it is imposible , however the way the USN and the US armed forces operate in general is that when they position there carrier group in say a real war scenario ( not a exerc.) , They keep a damn near intel on where the opposition is , search with all types of gizmos , destroy naval infrastructure from the FDOW point of view , take down communications etc etc . All in all the carrier when used in the right way is a very potent weapon specially if the user has a kick down type of Ability to destroy a lot of sensitive and communication targets in the first few hours of operation . What is tough to do is be prepared for a surprised , unprovoked attack to which a carrier group is very vulnerable . However even then the group is huge, you have massive fire power , good air defence , subs on the hunt , other satelite and land based intel etc etc but in general a carrier is MOST Vulnerable to a surprised attack however as an offensive weapon it kicks A$$ .

    Well.yeah..it will be a lot different in a actual scenario.And considering the USN specially..with 4/5 carriers parked..it will be a hell lot of a task if anyone got through the fighter screen.Plus all the other caveats of ECM hardkill defences etc. etc.
    Carriers are a very potent offensive weapon no doubt.I was just thinking about smaller navies(compared to the USN) operating 1/2 carriers that too STOBAR with an air complement of say 20 a/c each..or less.

    in reply to: Malabar 07 :Carriers sunk #2048180
    RayR
    Participant

    Sounds like quite a bit of INTEROPERABILITY was learned and acheived with this coherent exerc. , Hope many more will follow . In this global world allies need to be ready and know each others capability and should be able to work coherently against a common enemy

    Amen to that.

    Other then that i really dont pay much attention as a lot of KILLS are in context where both sides arent showing anything near what the have as they dont want to give away any secrets . It is reported that in the IAF exerc. with RAF the MKI’s didnt turn their Radars on , well if that is the case then out goes any serious BVR comparison between the 2 aircrafts . Similarly their is no way that the USN will show its capabilities in the department of EW , Air defence and even normal fighter aircraft capability . Vice versa for the IN , i am sure those jags and harriers had a lot more in them then the service was willing to show .

    In the end everyone gets a PR victory and goes home happy , clapping that they have sunk the kitty and virat respectivly . In reality what they have done is often overshadowed by these mega claims and that is – learned to fight along side each other , and well at the end of the day both the aviator and the sailor are more learned and able to adapt to changing threats and work as a team.

    Agreed..I wasnt concentrating on the “kills” part.

    in reply to: Malabar 07 :Carriers sunk #2048183
    RayR
    Participant

    Yep. Wonder how many Harriers would have got through had Aegis been active. :diablo:

    Boss,those were maritime Jaguars not SHARs.How about some MKIs with Brahmos:diablo:

    in reply to: IAF news-discussion July-September 2007 #2514276
    RayR
    Participant

    like what ?

    Grainy…

    in reply to: IAF news-discussion July-September 2007 #2514283
    RayR
    Participant

    Tejas with drop tanks in high resolution

    Frontier India forum link

    Thanks 21Ankush…but why is it like that?

    in reply to: Malabar 07 :Carriers sunk #2048261
    RayR
    Participant

    Excellent pictures here…search key “Malabar”

    http://www.navy.mil/search/photolist.asp

    in reply to: IAF news-discussion July-September 2007 #2514491
    RayR
    Participant

    Can somebody enlighten me on how to pronounce “Tejas”? Is there a sample clip with the proper pronunciation available somewhere? 🙂

    Hmm…let me try..

    “Te”–is “Tey” except pronounce the T as a spaniard would do ..as in “Te amo”

    “jas”–is “Just” without pronouncing the “t” at the end.

    in reply to: IAF news-discussion July-September 2007 #2514501
    RayR
    Participant

    Less the distractors, the Tejas keeps moving ahead. The same folk kept arguing about the Dhruv entering service and now with 70+ Dhruvs and WSI Dhruvs coming in….not suprisingly a few changes of words have occurred. My personal view is that India will see itself churning out Hundreds of Tejas as it see’s it’s threat perceptions increase all around it.
    Along with Mki’s, The new MRCA, Upgraded Mirage 2005, and upgraded Mig 29’s. We’re talking about an extremely formidable fleet.
    Emminent Plans for Hot Pursuit along with it’s Cold Start Docrine.

    Right said Muns.

    in reply to: IAF news-discussion July-September 2007 #2514504
    RayR
    Participant

    Looks very cool indeed.Any hi-res pix available?

    in reply to: IAF news-discussion July-September 2007 #2515364
    RayR
    Participant

    With all dues respect Nick, The Super whorenet may be a piece of junk that was thrust upon the USN after all their cool toys got canned, but it has an advantage over the LCA in that it is in widespread USN service and has attained an export order. We have yet to see any concrete evidence that the LCA will be ordered in anywhere near the numbers that the MMRCA and Su-30 have/ will be and the latest reports of thrust problems do not inspire a massive amount of faith. I would love nothing better than for 100+ LCA’s with AESA and an indigenous BVRAAM to be ordered but it has yet to happen, that is of course not saying that it wont but in the mean time I think it is best to reserve judgment. That is not to say that the project has not had huge benefits for Indian industry and for the IAF all ready becouse it clearly has.

    I agree with what you said.I think its fair that people say that they want to see the LCA in service first.:)

    But it will happen.:cool:

    in reply to: IAF news-discussion July-September 2007 #2516258
    RayR
    Participant

    LCA`s naval version scheduled to fly by middle of next year

    Bangalore, Sept 01: The naval version of the light combat aircraft is slated to fly by middle of next year, P S Subramanyam, Programme Director, Aeronautical Development Agency (ADA), Bangalore, said.

    Two prototypes have already been approved he said while speaking at the Aeronautical Society of India here today.

    The naval version would have a bigger cockpit and windscreen besides being capable of operating from an aircraft carrier, he said.

    Work was also on, on developing the concept of the Medium Combat Aircraft (MCA), a twin Engined aircraft, optimised for strike missions, he said.

    The project is still awaiting approval. But teams were working on bits and pieces on the technology of the airfcraft, he said.

    The design objective of the MCA, among others, would be stealth, thrust vectoring and supercruising. It would have some of the features of the LCA in addition to some critical advance technology.

    It was also working on the concept of supersonic lead in fight trainer, (Slift),a new trainer that will help prepare combat pilots much more effectively and at an affordable cost.

    Speaking on the occasion, T Mohan Rao, Director, Gas Turbine Research Establishment at Bangalore, outlined the ongoing work on the Kaveri engine[where is the outline:confused: ] that would power the LCA.

    Link

Viewing 15 posts - 1,156 through 1,170 (of 1,560 total)