dark light

ink

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 616 through 630 (of 1,597 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: PAK-FA updated info, anyone? #2528843
    ink
    Participant

    … And here we go again:

    BANGALORE/INDIA, January 23 (RIA Novosti) – Russia and India will jointly develop a project to build a fifth-generation fighter jet, the Russian defense minister said Tuesday.

    Sergei Ivanov, who is also a deputy prime minister, is currently leading a Russian delegation in India.

    The government of India has voiced its intention to participate in the project,” he said, adding that the issue will be discussed during President Vladimir Putin’s visit to the South Asian nation, scheduled for January 25-26.

    The minister also said Russia and India will sign an agreement enabling the latter to manufacture RD-33 engines under a Russian license.

    “We are close to concluding a licensing agreement to produce Russian-designed RD-33 engines in India,” he said.

    RD-33 OVT OVT thrust vectoring control engines power the MiG-35, an export version of the MiG-29M OVT (Fulcrum F), a highly maneuverable air superiority fighter first shown in August 2005 at the MAKS Air Show outside Moscow.

    Russian aircraft manufacturer MiG said Monday it hopes to win a tender to supply MiG-35s for the Indian Air Force.

    India and Russia have a long history of military cooperation, which goes back almost half a century. The existing Russian-Indian military-technical cooperation program, which lasts until 2010, lists up to 200 projects worth about $18 billion in all, according to Russia’s defense ministry.

    Notable deals in recent years have included a contract for the modernization and sale of the Admiral Gorshkov aircraft carrier, and deals for Sukhoi fighters and the T-90 battle tank.

    in reply to: PAK-FA updated info, anyone? #2529914
    ink
    Participant

    LFMS – Easy multi-purpose a front line an airplane

    Surely Laki (the ‘L’ in the acronym) is for ‘Light’ rather than ‘Easy’.

    in reply to: A new RuAF news thread #2531484
    ink
    Participant

    Gen. Mikhailov said the modernization of the entire front aviation fleet, including Su-24, Su-25, and MiG-29 fighters, was completed last year.

    Really? I guess I missed something.

    in reply to: MiG-35 and MiG-29 SMT presentation [pics] #2534018
    ink
    Participant

    But the question I would like to ask is , Is the Mig-35 an already evolved platform ( since its already a 3 decade old design and has gone through multiple upgrades/improvements , or as some one would argue that it was a design far ahead of its time ) with little scope of improvements over a period of 25 years , except perhaps on the avionics front ?

    Now, as far as I understood things the MiG-35 is only a “3 decades old design” in the sense that externally it resembles early model ’29s. I would expect that the internal design of the aircraft to be completely different – including the internal structure, layout of fuel-tanks, avionics, engines etc etc. In this internal sense, it might well be useful to think of it as a completely new aircraft, similar, in a way* to the relationship between the bug and the super-bug.

    * Obviously with the Hornet family, there (more) significant external differences too.

    in reply to: MiG-35 and MiG-29 SMT presentation [pics] #2535101
    ink
    Participant

    Ah yes, I see now… That is bizarre. Thanks!

    in reply to: MiG-35 and MiG-29 SMT presentation [pics] #2535231
    ink
    Participant

    ….but it now has a curious bulge behind the mainwheels on the engine trunking…???

    Ken, I’m sorry, I seem to have misunderstood something, which photo shows the ‘curious bulge’… I’m curious :rolleyes: .

    in reply to: ARMED FORCES OF MACEDONIA #2535893
    ink
    Participant

    I’d just like to make it clear that this post:

    Ukranian pilots are still flying the Mi-24s (I think thats from the BBC or perhaps the Times).

    As for Yugoslav small arms production, that is back up to at least a large fraction of its former level. In fact I’ve heard that Zastava might be looking to get license production of the AN-94 rifle from Izmash (admittedly the source isn’t 100% reliable). Certainly, JAG, much of Sloboda has been rebuilt.

    Yugoslavia has also reopened production of the M-84 to replace examples (of all tanks) lost during the Kosovo campaign, thereby increasing the number of modern tanks in the army’s inventory (Politika).

    … is nearly six years old and the information in it is either outright wrong (ah the benefits of hindisght) or has been superceded by newer developments.

    in reply to: Code Name for the J-10 Any Takers? #2538955
    ink
    Participant

    I quite like Frisbee… I think its somehow fitting.

    Also, how about Firearm?

    in reply to: MiG-23/27 Questions #2527768
    ink
    Participant

    The loadout in the pictures you posted is just for show, the AB-250, if dropped, would have almost certainly hit/scraped the centerline tank:

    Perhaps the intention with this kind of loadout is to drop the tank then the bombs – not the other way around.

    in reply to: Zhuhai 2006 #2533265
    ink
    Participant

    Su-35 (II)

    ZHUHAI (China), October 31 (RIA Novosti) – Sukhoi, Russia’s state-owned aircraft manufacturing holding, said Tuesday a prototype of its advanced multi-role fighter has been undergoing flight tests.

    Sukhoi is among more than 50 Russian companies showcasing their aircraft and aerospace technologies at the sixth China International Aviation & Aerospace Exhibition (Airshow China 2006), which opened today in Zhuhai, in southern China.

    “A prototype of the Su-35 has already conducted test flights, but I cannot give you more details,” said Sergei Sergeyev, deputy general director of the holding and head of Sukhoi’s China office.

    He also said the company has started to promote the Su-35 fighter on the Chinese market.

    The Su-35 Flanker-E is an advanced version of the Su-27 interceptor and is powered by two AL-37F engines. It is a versatile fighter that combines high maneuverability and the capacity to intercept air targets with ground and sea attack capability using both unguided and guided, including high precision, weapons.

    in reply to: Russian Military Export News #2535254
    ink
    Participant

    Could be interesting.

    MOSCOW, October 27 (RIA Novosti) – Argentina is interested in Russian armaments, Russia’s defense minister said Friday.

    “The Argentine side has handed over to us a specific list of military equipment it is interested in,” Sergei Ivanov, who is also a deputy prime minister, said following a meeting with his Argentine counterpart. “We have created a commission on military-technical cooperation, which will soon work on specific items.”

    A senior official from arms exporter Rosoboronexport said earlier that the South American country has shown an interest in Russian helicopters, which can be used for military and civilian purposes in varying climatic conditions.

    Sergei Ladygin, who heads Rosoboronexport’s regional cooperation department, said the company plans to participate in a tender for the supply of radars for Argentina’s air traffic control system.

    “We are ready to take part in the tender and to offer Argentina Gamma, Nebo, and Kasta radar stations, which are immune to antiradar missiles,” Ladygin said. “Importantly, all these radars can be used in air traffic control.”

    Russia and Argentina signed a military cooperation agreement in 2004, and Prime Minister Mikhail Fradkov’s visit to Buenos Aires in April reaffirmed the two countries’ plans to step up cooperation in the sphere.

    The current visit to Moscow by Nilda Garre, Argentina’s first female defense minister, was preceded by a series of talks with top Russian military officials.

    Speaking on the sidelines of a military exhibition in Argentina, SINPRODE-2006, in late September, Ladygin said he hopes that Russia’s Sukhoi planes will soon appear in Latin American countries, referring to planned deals with Mexico, Brazil, and Chile, as well as a $1.5 billion contract for 24 Su-30MK Flanker-C fighters with Venezuela.

    in reply to: Beriev gets to build Be-2500! #2551019
    ink
    Participant

    Personally I’m not really doubting the presence of a market – aid agencies, foreign (i.e. western) governments and armed forces all have a need to transport very large payloads quickly across the globe. Should the Be-2500 be available tomorrow it would doubtless find customers just as the An-225 is kept relatively busy. It would also probably be cheaper per ton of payload to operate than a heavy conventional transporter. The problem is finding funding to get this immensely complex and expensive project off the ground/water. I simply doubt that anyone is willing to front the billions of dollars required and to take on the risk involved.

    in reply to: Beriev gets to build Be-2500! #2551944
    ink
    Participant

    Two words….

    Yeah right 😎

    in reply to: Russia Cuts Back on Fifth Generation #2555602
    ink
    Participant

    Then it will be my Fin is bigger , my split airleon is larger then yours , my TVC nozzle is more boadcious then your TVC nozzle etc etc

    We surely cannot be the only members bored half to death by this sort of debate.

    … Or maybe we are*.

    * Judging by the “F-22 vs. S-300/400” thread we’re in a serious minority here.

    in reply to: Russia Cuts Back on Fifth Generation #2555707
    ink
    Participant

    I found this quite funny:

    Look up the F-15 ACTIVE, which has true 3D TVC, along with bigger canards than any Su-27 has on it.

    My canards are bigger than yours!

Viewing 15 posts - 616 through 630 (of 1,597 total)