dark light

B77W

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 901 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Thai Airways to cancel A380 order? #538699
    B77W
    Participant

    They wouldn’t be the first and I can’t see them been the last in the current economics… 🙁

    in reply to: LBA/EGNM time to dust off the Canon (long) pt.2 #462237
    B77W
    Participant

    Another great bunch, Mark!!

    Keep ’em coming fella…

    in reply to: Long summer evenings at Newcastle #462598
    B77W
    Participant

    Fantastic Adam!

    The last two are exceptional… 😉

    in reply to: Flight numbers and callsigns #539736
    B77W
    Participant

    Yeah, all the KLM’s operate with callsigns, the 1540 is the 64K.

    How else would they communicate? :diablo:

    I know what you mean… 😀

    in reply to: Flight numbers and callsigns #539935
    B77W
    Participant

    Hi,

    However Ryanair and I think KLM to mention just 2, do use their flight numbers as callsigns.
    AJ

    That’s not quite true, both use a mixture of numbers and letters. International flights usually use the flight number (without the extra numbers). For example, BA0001 becomes BAW1. EK017 becomes UAE17.

    There are two reasons for choosing a callsign, one is as a simple as, it’s easier to say, flight types (i.e. P for Positioning or as BA use LHR-MAN SHT2., MAN-LHR SHT3. as it’s easy to see ‘what’s happening.) or in some cases, because they can, so why not… 😀 Would you rather say BMA408 or BMA2LJ? :diablo: These reasons are down to the airline and can be changed from one day to the next – there’s no legal requirement.

    The other reason is confusion. ‘The flight identification is very often the same as the flight number, though this is not always the case. In case of call sign confusion a different flight identification can be chosen, the flight number will remain the same. Call sign confusion happens when two or more flights with similar flight numbers fly close to each other, e.g., KL645 and KL649 or BA466 and BA646.’ If “BAW1”, “BAW11”, “AAL1” and “UAE1” were all on frequency at the same time, confusion and/or mistakes are more likely.

    Sam

    in reply to: The sun stay's In BRS … 4th June 2009 #462755
    B77W
    Participant

    Some nice images, Rob.

    A ‘tad’ more exposure wouldn’t go a miss on most though!

    in reply to: Civilian Missing Plane Search Called Off – VariEze, #429506
    B77W
    Participant

    I agree with you in that hope…

    Maybe it’s more a GA section matter?

    in reply to: EMA 24/31 May #462948
    B77W
    Participant

    A great selection there!

    It’s always nice to see a post which doesn’t always feature the most ‘perfect’ images, but in many ways the most ‘realistic’.

    in reply to: 31/05 – Hole in the Runway #463397
    B77W
    Participant

    Thanks Guys!

    TP – Southside of 05R at Manchester.

    in reply to: 31/05 – Hole in the Runway #463533
    B77W
    Participant

    Thanks Guys!

    in reply to: Photo's from this morning's footie flights.. #463769
    B77W
    Participant

    That’s because they’re both part of TUI… 😉

    in reply to: Avsim 'Destroyed' #220914
    B77W
    Participant
    in reply to: Luton 24/5/09…. WARNING! May contain sunlight! #463964
    B77W
    Participant

    Great work, Dan!

    If you keep on improving at this rate, God help us… 🙂

    in reply to: Champions League Charters #464062
    B77W
    Participant

    Thank you!

    in reply to: Photo's from this morning's footie flights.. #464083
    B77W
    Participant

    Very nice!

    There looks to be a lot more variety today, but like you said… The weather! 🙁

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 901 total)